Country First

[Wild Cobra]

maybe you can follow this if you spit out your gum.

Maybe you could follow it properly if you lost your negative prejudice against me.

[ElNono]

Maybe you could follow it properly if you lost your negative prejudice against me.

What does this even mean? He posted the entire exchange. Do you still have problems following it?

[Wild Cobra]

What does this even mean? He posted the entire exchange. Do you still have problems following it?

I followed it perfectly, but he didn't post the entire exchange.

I gave a general answer to a general question. When he changed the goalpost to meaning president, I changed the answer accordingly.

Why is that so hard for you to follow?

My intent was to indicate I would vote for who ever runs against him.

its not just him. you vote for the r period

Not true. there you go lying again. I vote for 3rd party candidates regularly. It's just democrats I very seldom vote for.

When he said "period" instead of specifying he meant president, I answered in general, not specific to presidential elections, but elections in general.

what 3rd party candidate for president got your vote?

Now he specify president. Changing the goalpost from a general statement to specific question.

None of them yet. I haven't been paying much attention. Too soon. I haven't picked a republican either. I just know I will not vote for Obama.

so...you've never voted for a 3rd party candidate for president. so, i'm not lying. thanks

I almost did twice, and have for other offices. Your statement wasn't exclusive to president anyway, and a fraudulent assumption of my character.

[ElNono]

I don't need the sub les. I understand the exchange was about voting for president. It's pretty clear from this statement:

My intent was to indicate I would vote for who ever runs against him.

[Wild Cobra]

I don't need the sub les. I understand the exchange was about voting for president. It's pretty clear from this statement:

Yes, but this is key:

its not just him. you vote for the r period its not just him. you vote for the r period

Who decides if the topic drifted to all votes, or just presidential votes. I was responding to all political votes in general. He wasn't specific, and i took advantage of that.

Haven't you learned my MO yet?

Gave me reason to call him a liar, which I probable wouldn't if he didn't actually make slanderous statements of me from time to time.

[ElNono]

Moving goalposts? It's been clear for a while...

[Wild Cobra]

Moving goalposts? It's been clear for a while...

But the room was clearly given to move it!

We all take advantage of situations at times.

He gave me a clear move option, but I didn't give him a clear move option.

[ElNono]

No, you moved the goalposts and got defensive as soon as it was pointed out to you that you were talking out of your ass. Par the course, tbh.

[Wild Cobra]

No, you moved the goalposts and got defensive as soon as it was pointed out to you that you were talking out of your ass. Par the course, tbh.

I'm always a jerk to clambake when given the opportunity. It had nothing to do with the content, but that the asshole gave me an opening.

[DMX7]

The only thing TeaBaggers hate more than being called a racist is black people.

[clambake]

one of the weakest men on the planet.

[Wild Cobra]

The only thing TeaBaggers hate more than being called a racist is black people.

Can you support that contention with evidence?

[Blake]

When he said "period" instead of specifying he meant president, I answered in general, not specific to presidential elections, but elections in general.

Now he specify president. Changing the goalpost from a general statement to specific question.

Most of us got that he implied president from the get-go.

It was blatantly obvious he specified 'president' in the next post to clarify the dialogue, not to 'change' the goal post.

The miscommunication has been cleared up and your point has now been made.......but you declaring victory, thanks in part to your sloppy communication skills, is out loud laughable.