Do not feed the troll. This guy does not have a clue about basketball.
Yeah bicycle, swimming blah blah blah
It's still not the same as running.
Do not feed the troll. This guy does not have a clue about basketball.
What's so special about running?
Yes, please save him from making a fool out of himself even furthur. Good one.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slu..._irving_062311The San Antonio Spurs’ aggressive pursuit of a lottery pick had them trying to get into the early teens, with hopes of using one of those picks to move up even higher in the first round, sources said. San Antonio could get into the late teens – perhaps the Utah Jazz slot at 12 – to draft. The Spurs are enamored with Lithuanian 7-footer Dontas Montejunas, sources said, and could move up to take him in the late lottery picks. Nevertheless, several teams believe San Antonio’s ultimate goal is to parlay that late lottery pick into an even higher spot in the first round. The Spurs are discussing deals involving guard George Hill(notes) to get them anywhere from 11 to 13, and using Tony Parker(notes) in talks to rise up to the Sacramento Kingsâ or Toronto Raptorsâ picks at seven and five, respectively.
Now THAT is one of the more ridiculous posts I've seen you make. What's so special about running? When a huge part of your job is running? I'm not sure how fat you are, but swimming and bicycling will not prepare you for running. Different muscles, different breathing rhythms, it's a different sport. That's like saying playing volleyball gets you ready for rugby, it's ludicrous. Don't try and fit the truth to your logic. You sound like a Marxist that way.
You risk it to fill another need. With the incredible logjam we have at guard and the need we have at SF and post someone becomes expendable. Since Manu effectively plays point much of the game either Parker or Hill make sense. The Spurs are very high on James Anderson and Neal proved himself to be someone who deserves minutes as well. If they are both going to get minutes this year then either Parker, Hill or Ginobili becomes expendable. Since Manu has become our "closer" in tight games that leaves Hill or Parker. It seems that they are both being shopped. My hunch is that they are trying to position a Parker trade to nab Enes Canter and Hill toward the end of the lottery to pick up Chris Singleton. Thus filling other needs and balancing the team.
beyond just the position he plays - hill also fills a role of an attacking guard who can get himself to the FT line even when the shot isn't falling. as bad as his shooting was against Memphis, he still managed to have a couple semi-productive games thanks to this.
i like JA and Neal - but both seem more like spot up shooters than guys who will attack the paint (Anderson may prove me wrong, but Neal likely is what he is at this juncture - not that there is anything wrong with that).
Not against moving Hill, but definitely think you have to be eyeing a guy who can get to the foul line in return.
It's ok, I read on the best-basketball-tips.com that Steve Novak can play small forward.
Gold.
Not really. Thnk of a Ben Wallace, who this guy reminds me of. Biyambo is a nice athlete, but whose raw. Any team team using a top 10 pick on Biyambo would be reaching imo.
Tjastal just has a knack for it tbh.
You're quite dumb.
But not this dumb.
Now you're just trolling.
Nah, you are that dumb. Carry on.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)