Reply With Quote
LOL at grown man using LOL.
LOL at you forgetting what we couldnt do in the playoffs
LOL at you applauding running in the reg season then playing stall-ball in the playoffs.
LOL at you being clueless
NEXT
lol #2 offense in the league
lol still need scoring
lol 2 inches shorter version of bonner
lol yet another shooting guard
lol not having any ing clue what the team needs
LOL at grown man using LOL.
LOL at you forgetting what we couldnt do in the playoffs
LOL at you applauding running in the reg season then playing stall-ball in the playoffs.
LOL at you being clueless
NEXT
So you aren't a grown man then?
QUICK SOMEONE GO DOWNSTAIRS AND GET GUISEPPE!!!
I'm still puzzled about how we're supposed to compare Matt Howard with Kawhi Leonard.
His scoring. His height, his rebounding. If we want a SF to play defender and hit a three then Howard is better than Leonard on O. Not so much on D
I really wish SA would make the illegal mexicans take a class on reading comprehension, and higher level thinking, maybe a basketball PE course? The comments on here are making everyone laugh.
Si Senor
San Diego State was #3 in the final regular season RPI this year and went to the Sweet 16. Not exactly a "junk" team.
Isn't there some sort of a computer interlock device that people have to blow into in order to determine their IQ prior to being allowed to post? If not I'm going to invent one. Friends don't let friends post dumb sh!t.
In no way, shape or form is Matt Howard now or will he ever be a SF. I follow Butler pretty closely. My parents met at Butler and my Dad flies up there a couple times a year to watch games. I've watched enough of my share, and was even at the Final Four in 2010 in Indianapolis. You need to stop talking like a re .
They were also bumped off by the eventual National Champion.
Based on what? All the NBA talent-level wings in the Big 10 that he shut down?
lol san diego state a "junk" team.
So basically, when everyone here disagrees with you, your only recourse is to vomit racist insults. What is so high-level about thinking that either one of two undrafted players is better than a projected lottery pick, number 15 pick? Now, if you were a NBA scout, then your arguments would hold more water. However, you're a scrub on a junk team spouting your opinion as fact.
I know, that one game against Uconn made them a powerhouse in terms of opponents
http://goaztecs.cstv.com/sports/m-ba.../team e.html
Yes, I know Matt Howard would make a better PF which is why I listed him as a better stretch that Bonner. I referenced him with Leonard to make his 3% shooting that much more disastrous. READ THE COMMENTS. If we wanted a SF.... then Howard is better on O. Not so much on D.
me gusta leer!
In no way is Matt Howard a SF. I don't understand why you're so brain damaged you cannot understand this.
No one said he was a SF. I just said for being A PF he shoots a three better than a SF. If we need a scoring wing who can play D what is the sense of getting only an athletic player who cant do either necessarily well. THAT MAKES AS MUCH SENSE AS PUTTING A PF on the WING especially since he can shoot a 3 10x better than Leonard.
Thick
Matt Howard
ing dude sucks man. He is a hustle player and I'll give him that but he was barely able to get it done in college and killed the offense with poor shot selection. He could barely shoot the COLLEGE 3 that well and was streaky as with it, don't even want to see him try an NBA 3.
The reason we couldn't run in the PO's was because of our bad defense, mainly RJ jumping at every Sam Young pump fake. Leonard will not let those sort of shenanigans go on.
lol responding to trollthread
From post #1
Howard is better than Bonner and can be used just the same. Not athletic. But neither is Bonner. Howard is more consistent and doesnt let a wet fart when the pressure is on.
Great reading skills
When Howard was 19 - he was such a good 3PT shooter that he only attempted 9 3 pointers all year (only hit 2 of those). ...And that was with a shorter arc.
And, as a center, Howard got an open 3 on just about any possession that he wanted with opposing centers reluctant to follow him outside.
FWIW, while he greatly improved as a shooter by his SR year, he still built that up against lackluster compe ion - hitting only 9/34 3s in the tournament (below 30%). For comparison, Leonard hit 4/10.
That doesn't even take into account that Howard would have a well below average handle, court vision, passing ability, quickness, and turns the ball over too much for a SF. .
..Not a big deal, because he's not a small forward and has never been asked to be one and never will be asked to be one.
Exaggerate much?
I'll agree that matt howard sucks, I will also agree that so did this whole draft. So if your the 50th sucky player in a sucky draft you still suck. = leonard.
Put it into context.
We could have gotten something for nothing with lighty, still traded hill and given us a pick next year or a vet.
Thinking that the addition of Leonard makes us legit is insane. We will still have the same problems if the coaching remains the same.
all in all it was good we got rid of hill. Leonard is not a great player and needs to be in a running situation to be successful. FACT. If our coach tries the same BS as last year in the POs it will be the same thing for us and the pick will be wasted.
RJs crap defense had nothing to do with the playoffs. He was an awful defender in the regular season. We lost because we didnt play to outscore the opponent. We didnt run enough.
sorry leonards shooting ability allows him to knock down a whopping 29% a season from NCAA 3. Perfect
Saying Lighty is 'something' is a of a reach. Especially considering that not one team wanted him in this "sucky" draft.
And if you are undrafted in a sucky draft, you suck worse.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
