lol Colombia. Hater probably has some "biz" with the cartel to have them rated that high
It seems he is exclusively using the current Copa America tournament to form his rankings. Colombia has played so well while some of the better sides haven't, in the 3 games that have been played by each team. The following list is hater's top south american forward ranking:lol Colombia. Hater probably has some "biz" with the cartel to have them rated that high
1. Aguero
2. Falcao
3. Pato
4. Neymar
5. Messi
Ok yeah you're getting trolled Maxi
tbh, they're either trolling or delusional.
Paraguay > Mexico
6-0 bukkake
3-1 bukkake earlier this year
Serious question, has any other CONEMBOL team not named Brasil or Argentina make it out of the World Cup group stage 5 world cups in a row??Didn't think so..
I agree that... lol Gio
how did mexico do last copa america when they took an A team someone remind me please
1. Brasil
2.Argentina
3.Mexico, Chile, Uruguay, Paraguay
mexico would qualify to the WC in conmebol easily too, the Estadio Azteca is one of the hardest places for visitors to get a win bc of the elvation of mexico city and just the size of the stadium itself...just ask the usa
Last edited by vato loco; 07-15-2011 at 01:39 AM.
thanks. you made my morning.
Mexico has been playing vs. Belize, Virgin Islands and Curacao to qualify for the World Cup. What in the world makes you think they could "easily" qualify in a real conference.
"does good vs. Commebol in friendlies and meaningless compe ions"
we agree.
again, good luck to Mexico hopefully they won't ruin their team by partying with trannies in hotel rooms. oops
if the sport was changed to " ing transexuals" mexico would qualify top of the conference
let's get this back on topic.
Che's predictions for the Copa America quarters:
Peru 1 Colombia 2
Argentina 1 Uruguay 1 (argentina on penalties)
Brazil 3 Paraguay 1
Chile 2 Venezuela 0
how about the fact that mexico reaches the semis or finals of copa america on a consistent basis when they take their A team? or the huge home field advantage they'd have at the Azteca? ecuador made it to like 3 WCs simply winning at home bc of the elevation in quito, mexico's HFA would be even bigger than ecuador's.
thanks. you made my morning.
Mexico has been playing vs. Belize, Virgin Islands and Curacao to qualify for the World Cup. What in the world makes you think they could "easily" qualify in a real conference.
brazil and arg are locks, and mexico would be right alongside paraguay as teams that would reach the WC 7-8 times out of 10...the other teams would alternate missing WCs depending on how good their current generations are.
and honestly that transexual ain't bad i'd that hoe without giving it a second thought
you cannot compare copa america to a wc qualifier. mexico would have to visit 10 countries and play each country as local. I would be surprised if they even get 3-4 wins from those. They might "barely" qualify. But that is very far from being a lock and easily qualifify.
it's the exact same teams so yes while not identical they're comparable, mexico has proven they can hold their own against conmebol compe ion. and that's all they would have to do is get a couple away wins+ties and hold serve at home.
it would be harder than concacaf qualifiers for sure but mexico would still qualify on a consistent basis in conmebol, very similar to what paraguay has been the doing the last two decades.
maybe vato maybe
WC qualifiers are completely different. Long tournament, you play twice with every team, once at home and once on the road. Copa America is much shorter and much more single elimination games. Qualifiers are more like a league.
sorry about bolivia's dry spell btw
joaquin botero was one of my faves when he played for pumas his shoot em up celebrations were sick
i know the format...
mexico would qualify on their huge HFA alone tho
that's the point. ALL TEAMS have the huge HFA in qualifiers. that is why it's much much tougher. Not to mention qualifiers last 2 years. A team needs to sustain level for 2 years.
seriously. come back to reality vato.
you really think Mexico is gonna prance to Santiago in a packed house of 70,000 chileans and just take the game? or go to Lima and beat Peru in front of 60,000 wild peruvians, or even go up 12,000 feet into the atmosphere in La Paz and slap Bolivia?
come back to reality vato.
bolivia is bro, elevation and HFA advantage can only help u so much...u need some quality players too which they don't have. same with peru. there's a reason they always finish in the bottom during qualifiers. venzuela is making strides but they're a baseball first country so i don't think we'll ever see them in WCs consistently, maybe one here or there.
get wins from those teams+a tie or two against the other comp and take advantage of mexico city's elevation, smog, and 115,000 seat azteca and we good
son, You are crazy if you think it would be "easy"
not easy, they'd miss a WC here or there instead of attending every single one like they do in concacaf
but i think they'd fall right alongside paraguay as teams that are almost always a shoe-in to finish 3rd/4th in qualifiers
bolivia&peru- wit no bright future in sight
venezuela-baseball crazed country
uruguay-overrated forlan is on the decline, only a matter of time before they go back to missing WCs on a regular basis and living on past glories
colombia, chile-inconsistent, a good generation pops up every now and then
ecuador-peaked, seem to have exploited quito's elevation to it's fullest
mexico is consistent, altho never elite they have a history of maintaining the same solid level (reaching round of 16 in WC like the past six/seven WCs)...very similar to paraguay.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
