This is how you git r done:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...ick-perry.html
Wait, did you say 'beliefs', and now you changed it to 'values'?
I see what you did there...
This is how you git r done:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...ick-perry.html
Hey, I don't agree with it either. However, it is a plausible explanation considering the accepted theories when dealing with space/time. We have no way of proving it right or wrong. To us, it is as silly of a notion as the idea of space travel, computers, etc. to our ancestors of multiple generations past.
What if someday we find we can bend space/time?
Let's say both.
I agree with values, not necessarily agree with beliefs, tbh. Obviously, there's all sorts of parenting out there, so YMMV.
You just saw an example of a parent pushing her belief.
Do you have kids?
Don't you try to instill both your beliefs and values upon them?
We already tested and know for a fact that the Earth changes space/time, and how it does it.
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news...11/04may_epic/
You're a little late with your theorem, and obviously, I don't see that finding making scientists postulate your garbage theory as anything plausible.
I don't have kids at the moment. My parents however instilled values, and taught me their religious beliefs, but didn't 'indoctrinate' me in them. (indoctrinate meaning 'accept a set of beliefs uncritically'). They let me decide what I wanted for myself, and to critically think and speak about it.
That's good parenting, IMO.
It's not my "garbage theory." To summarily toss out a scientific theory you cannot give cause to be wrong, is very unscientific.
I just did 'give cause' to be wrong. Space and time has been bending throughout the last 6000+ years. It's a fact.
I see you missed the point being made. Besides, you appear limited to believing space/time can only bend with gravity. Why are you close minded?
I didn't miss a thing.
link where I stated that?
lol closed minded
By indication the NASA experiment shows the theory wrong.
You're a little late with your theorem, and obviously, I don't see that finding making scientists postulate your garbage theory as anything plausible.
So because it seems silly, it is therefore a valid possibility?
I agree it is silly and not likely. However, that doesn't mean I have a closed mind to the possibility.
Either way, being possible doesn't make it plausible, and more importantly, it doesn't make it science...
Non existential universal claims cannot be disproved. For example, you cannot disprove that a pink unicorn lives somewhere in the universe. I think it's a silly idea but can you prove it wrong?
There's no need to contemplate notions that are silly. If they are silly because you lack understanding, that's one thing and maybe you will overcome that with time, but if they are silly because they lack substance, that's another.
I asked for a link/quote where I stated that space/time can only fluctuate with gravity. Quote or it didn't happen.
Maybe his former Secretary of State will come forward...
I was under the impression that your NASA experiment link was an indication that you meant only gravity can affect space/time. If I misunderstood you, I'm sorry.
It also mean "To imbue with a partisan or ideological point of view." The idea doesn't have to be forced.
indoctrinate.
Synonyms
1. brainwash, propagandize.
You could simply say 'teach' and we wouldn't be having this conversation, tbh.
Besides the idea of Quackery, what point are you making?
It's not uncommon for people have unconventional procedures.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)