Plus: You're an a-hole and a p*ssy
Boiled down though:::
Kobe: 5
the bag: 4
Wade: 1
Let's boil it down a step further, to eliminate inconsistencies.
Rings as the man:
Jordan 6
Duncan 3
Kobe 1
Wade 1*
When did Kobe won as the man?
3 for Shaq
2 for Pau - and Pau ed up in 2011, and the Lakers lose; coincidence?
So Kobe as the man has 0, Pau and Dirk >>> Kobe
Kobeh ted on by soft Euros![]()
Is he a Euro ?
You're just talkin' out your hat because Kori is your aunt.
No.
Jordan: 6
Kobe: 5
the bag: 4
Wade: 1
I really don't know much about him to be honestI just remember him and Baby Gasol taking Timmy D's lunch money in last years playoffs.
how come you use team accomplishments, when comparing players head to head? oh right... jordan, bag and wade all on kobe when it actually matter... in the playoffs![]()
Still, you're a p*ssy and a-hole for using it as an excuse.
To compare individual players you have to divide by a common denominator- IE, rings as the man.
Because that's what "we" did when it was:
Kobe & Daddy: 0
And "we" did that when it was:
Duncan: 4
Kobe: 3
And "we" did it when it was:
Daddy: 4
Kobe: 3:
Ipso facto we're doing it now:
Kobe: 5
the bag: 4
Agreed. Nephew Deepy has been a uva regulator.
I do remember Bowen getting his ass took, but I guess Bowen is not an elite wing defender?![]()
Duncan: 4
Kobe: 3
its ok because duncan backs up his ring count with actual quality performances in the playoffs as the man, unlike kobe who coattails bigmen
Daddy: 4
Kobe: 3:
again, no argument, shaq > kobe who coattailed him
Kobe: 5
the bag: 4
kobe doesn't back it up though, its like saying, horry 7 > jordan 6, or fisher 5 > duncan 4
your shtick has serious flaws, tbh
or more simply put, when those guys were winning the debate it was because their les were all won as the man. kobes were not, therefore he doesn't get the benefit of being able to count rings.
have no opinion on fdr
american front was a sideshow
the real action was in the east, where my glorious armies butt ed the out of the nazis pigs, tbqh
Jordan is untouchable. That was already established, so I don't get the point of this article.
finland, even more of a sideshow, tbh
despite their valiant efforts, they still lost
besides, russia has plenty of soldiers
what's a million dead to me??![]()
Hitler
backstabbing Russia
losing to Russia
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)