Reply With Quote
If Peyton is 100% healthy, you sign him and lock him up for another 3-4 years on any team outside of NO, NE, GB and I guess Pitt.
Indy wouldn't even contemplate releasing him.
But they are.
If Peyton is 100% healthy, you sign him and lock him up for another 3-4 years on any team outside of NO, NE, GB and I guess Pitt.
Indy wouldn't even contemplate releasing him.
But they are.
Daniel Snyder is still around, if the Colts want to get rid of Manning, get something in return. Redskins are notorious for their horrible trades/signings.
Peyton also wasn't dealing with a serious neck injury over the years. If we're talking Manning at 100%, I would take him even if the Cowboys had no offensive line at all.
Like dirk4 just said, have you not seen Indy's line over the years? Peyton's got a quick release and either him or Brady would win no less than 12 games every year with those Cowboys weapons.
However, we're talking about a guy who's career is realistically one play away from being over every snap
Fair enough.
It's also true that while Romo has plenty of issues, the QB position is the least of Dallas's problems. Outside of Ware, Lee, and Jenkins their defense is a mess. Their offensive line was also a question mark last year and their RBs suck. Wherever Peyton Manning goes, he's gonna expect to keep the massive salary he has in Indy. Dallas has too many problems to commit caps space to a QB with a career threatening neck injury when they have a solid QB already.
Agreed. The Cowboys have a lot more glaring issues than QB.
the only draw back for manning going to az is warner joined and they won they went to the superbowl if he does not get them their
OUCH
az record was bad at first because coaches were trying to much and they scaled back on the playcalling to more simple plays without training camp
Last edited by ducks; 02-16-2012 at 07:48 PM.
You've found 5 videos of bad games he's had in his entire career...congratulations.
All I was trying to say...perfect. The only thing I disagree with in this comment is the RBs suck. Felix sucks..absolutely. If Murray can stay healthy, he's solid. But I guess that depends on him being healthy, which is unlikely.
I said the same and you tried to put me on blast. Of course if Peyton is 100% he's better than Romo. 100% Peyton is the best QB in the NFL bar none. But he's not...so you don't spend money on a QB who will always have neck issues for the rest of his life, even after his playing days...especially when you have a decent QB and MANY other problems.
I said the same and you tried to put me on blast. Of course if Peyton is 100% he's better than Romo. 100% Peyton is the best QB in the NFL bar none. But he's not...so you don't spend money on a QB who will always have neck issues for the rest of his life, even after his playing days...especially when you have a decent QB and MANY other problems.it's so easy to put you on blast b/c you're the biggest homer on here. BUMP is not a homer so I didn't ride him about it.
"Not a fan of Romo." gtfoYou're the same mother er whose ass got so red when the December Romo troll was unveiled, and you sucked wittle Tony off after the rib-injured niners game. Yeah, you definitely aren't a Romo fan
Yeah, QB is not their biggest concern, but that's like an AIDS patient saying the lesions on their face are the least of their worries. That's true, but you still have AIDS...and don't act like there isn't a -ton more games of him ing up besides those 5. If you think adding a couple studs to the secondary is going to put you past the likes of GB, NO, NYG, etc, then you're severely disillusioned.
A loser is a loser, anyway you cut it. Just because you like his name and he seems like a good ol' boy with American values and heart, it doesn't mean you have to drop to your knees and drain his balls.
December Romo troll came out three years ago...I was a lot more tolerant of Romo then. And I only got excited about the 9ers game because I finally thought he hit his stride where we might have a prayer. Had a of a game for a guy with a punctured lung and broken rib. I can be impressed by a player and not be a huge fan. If you call that a homer, that's fine..just get a better dictionary.
"Not a fan of Romo." gtfo
Yeah, QB is not their biggest concern, but that's like an AIDS patient saying the lesions on their face are the least of their worries. That's true, but you still have AIDS...and don't act like there isn't a -ton more games of him ing up besides those 5. If you think adding a couple studs to the secondary is going to put you past the likes of GB, NO, NYG, etc, then you're severely disillusioned.
A loser is a loser, anyway you cut it. Just because you like his name and he seems like a good ol' boy with American values and heart, it doesn't mean you have to drop to your knees and drain his balls.
You're STILL defending him tooth and nail, despite 6 years of solid evidence that he's a glorified stat collector.
I don't need your support you got. Why don't you go blast some Creed while bending over your sister. Oh wait...she left you...nevermind.
Really don't get your logic. I acknowledged him having one good game last year and I'm defending him tooth and nail.You're STILL defending him tooth and nail, despite 6 years of solid evidence that he's a glorified stat collector.
So he's a winner now, is he?
Winners don't lose games in inexplicable fashion every year
Not anymore. Elite The Eliminator Manning and his 2 rings/Superbowl MVP trophies say o.
I said the same and you tried to put me on blast. Of course if Peyton is 100% he's better than Romo. 100% Peyton is the best QB in the NFL bar none. But he's not...so you don't spend money on a QB who will always have neck issues for the rest of his life, even after his playing days...especially when you have a decent QB and MANY other problems.
47-30 record = winning.So he's a winner now, is he?
Winners don't lose games in inexplicable fashion every year
What's his record once December rolls around and gets real?
You sure like defending mentally weak big-game chokers
are you just trying to bait Romo lovers or something...
"Not a fan of Romo." gtfo
Yeah, QB is not their biggest concern, but that's like an AIDS patient saying the lesions on their face are the least of their worries. That's true, but you still have AIDS...and don't act like there isn't a -ton more games of him ing up besides those 5. If you think adding a couple studs to the secondary is going to put you past the likes of GB, NO, NYG, etc, then you're severely disillusioned.
A loser is a loser, anyway you cut it. Just because you like his name and he seems like a good ol' boy with American values and heart, it doesn't mean you have to drop to your knees and drain his balls.
Correction..the Dallas Cowboys are mentally weak big-game chokers...not just Romo. And I guess I do defend him...but only from idiots who seem to think he's the only reason the Cowboys are losing, and we'll magically be fixed if we trade him. And it's not defending him necessarily...it's basically stating facts that it's the team that sucks..not just the QB.What's his record once December rolls around and gets real?
You sure like defending mentally weak big-game chokers
How many of the same starters are still there from when he took over as starter back in 2006?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
