Rasho Nesterovic
Do you really think the Pacers are gonna let Hibbert go somewhere else this summer? Not gonna happen
Rasho Nesterovic
Thats really up to Hibbert, not the Pacers.
It's up to the Pacers, he's restricted.
Yep, I was just going to re-edit after I looked it up. Sometimes, it pays to look things up ahead of time.
Finally someone who is a smart Basketball fan, I like this line up
at the idea of the NBA owned team helping out the Spurs.
Now maybe if it was LA...
Anyone who thinks RJ is tradeable is not a smart basketball fan, sure that would be nice if it happened but it wont
Doubt it. The Spurs would like that but what does Duncan have to gain? It will all come down to how he feels at the end of the season. The Spurs wouldn't pressure him to come to a decision now and that's the last thing on Duncan's mind at the moment.
P.S.
Does Duncan even have an agent these days? Serious question.
People really think someone wants Jefferson and his remaining 21m contract?
The only way to trade Jefferson is bringing another contract back or adding value. I doubt our FO does it, considering that we can just use the amnesty clause on him.
Okafors contract is worse than RJ's
I like Okafor. Doubt the Spurs could get him, but it would be glorious if they could do it.
Actually, yes, since Okafors contract has about 27-28 mil left..People, the spurs do not want to pay RJ 80% of his current contract while he is playing for another team which would happen if he was amnisteed. That is a last resort for the spurs FO.
I did. You can have a worse contract and still be easier to move. In fact, I outlined why I thought that in the very part you highlighted in case you missed it (competent big men).
They aren't mutually exclusive those posts you quoted.
You forgot the part that NOLA doesn't want any part of Jefferson and his 21m contract.
If the Spurs don't want to pay 's contract, they shouldn't have given him a 39m contract when he didn't deserve half of that in the 1st place. You make a mistake, you deal with it.
Any team in the league would rather pay 27m for Emeka instead of 21m for Jefferson, including NOLA.
I believe that they are.
of course anyone would want Okafor over RJ but thats why the spurs would need to sweeten the pot a little: draft pick and some youth. Saving 6-7 mil over 2 years isnt all that bad a sweetner either...
Yes that's true, but I don't see that the Hornets have a need for another small forward when they already have Aminu, and Ariza.
If they needed to move Ariza i am pretty sure there would be takers...But yes, that is 1 of many things wrong with this trade rumour..
For the obvious reason; the two positions contradict one another.
To even begin to convince me otherwise you would have to make your case that Okafor's contract is worse than RJ's. I see RJ's contract as significantly worse, as does everyone that's commented on their relative value in this thread. Feel free to try, but I don't see how you can make that case. RJ at 2/21 is much worse that Okafor at 2/28.
I meant worse with regards to money owed, not value. The person I quoted stated RJs money owed and I replied with Okafors is worse and in context I was referring to total money owed.
That's not what you said, even in reply to my post.
Then you mean, more expensive, not worse.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)