Reply With Quote
What did I just tell you?
Go read the post to your mother.
Who you talking about now, Fabbs or WeNeedLength?
What did I just tell you?
Go read the post to your mother.
When you said "No, I told him he should just look them up himself" who is the "he" referring to?
Ask your mother who wanted the updated information in this thread, dumbass.
lol can't follow a single train of thought
lol won't reveal who the "he" was referring to
lol forum cop
You know, as the forum grammar/fact checker I think you need to pay more attention to what argument you're currently engaging in, lest you start swerving all over the road. Doesn't set a good example for the rest of us to follow.
It has already been revealed.
It's very clear to whom I'm talking to about what.You know, as the forum grammar/fact checker I think you need to pay more attention to what argument you're currently engaging in, lest you start swerving all over the road. Doesn't set a good example for the rest of us to follow.
Uh, you sure about that? I was talking about WeNeedLength's out of date stat list and you just veered headlong into a rant about Fabbs. Care to explain that or are you just going to just keep up with this cryptic "it has already been revealed" line of crap?
Yep.It's more than clear.I was talking about WeNeedLength's out of date stat list and you just veered headlong into a rant about Fabbs. Care to explain that or are you just going to just keep with this cryptic "it has already been revealed" line of bs?
There would be no reason for me to tell the person who found and posted the stats two months ago that he can't find those same stats when some moron who has never looked up anything in his life asks for them two months later.
Only you could be this stupid.
lol cryptic
I was giving you a chance to figure it out yourself to safe you some embarrassment. I know you think about me sexually all the time, but I don't want to hold your hand.
Well obviously the ball was dropped and the thread wasn't delivered up to date stats. As the official forum fact checker you need to start regulating. You getting soft already?
Not his job.
That was the whole point.
Do you understand now what was being said now or do you need another page of hand holding?
What about your job? Do you understand now?
My job has nothing to do with this forum.I understand your butt has never stopped hurting from getting constantly owned in this forum. This latest schtick isn't working either.Do you understand now?
Sorry.
Hey, I was just pointing out what I considered a dereliction of duty, sir. The thread asked for exact up to date stats and that wasn't delivered to specification of said thread. I thought as the self-appointed forum cop you would be all over that. Sorry to see that you're already getting soft. Kind of like how Pop has gotten the past couple years.
Hey, you were just wrong.[/quote]The thread asked for exact up to date stats and that wasn't delivered to specification of said thread.[/quote]You sure didn't look for them.No one appointed anyone to anything. You were wrong.I thought as the self-appointed forum cop you would be all over that.Sorry to see your butt still hurts after all this time. I didn't mean to permanently damage your fragile psyche this way. I feel pity for you.Sorry to see that you're already getting soft. Kind of like how Pop has gotten the past couple years.
Apparently today's lesson is that it's okay to barge into someone else's thread and lambast them for asking a question concerning some obscure fact (which may not be easy to find for everybody) yet when someone posts some cryptic list they dug up from god knows where that is 3 months out of date hey no problem, at least they didn't waste any time trying to find out the current up to date information which according to the resident forum cops should be easy to do.
Seems like two different standards we're dealing with here.....
How would you know? You didn't even try.yet when someone posts some cryptic list they dug up from god knows where that is 3 months out of date hey no problemYou should bother looking at the date those stats were posted. It's out of date because it was posted in January.
You spent all afternoon ing about not being able to understand simple sentences.at least they didn't waste any time trying to find out the current up to date information which according to the resident forum cops should be easy to do.
Nope. It's still damned easy to look up the stats. Your mom could have found it in a couple of minutes had you only asked her.Seems like two different standards we're dealing with here.....
lol cops
I've heard this before. What exactly is Buford's contributon to this team or is he some welfare case that Pop felt sorry for so he offered him a job?
There is no way any one person can juggle that much responsibility and be successful at both. I'm sure Pop has imput, but Buford has to have the final say or I don't see a need to have him on the payroll.
Refer to this thread which TiMVP has posted some time back
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=191529
RC Bufford is a Senior Vice President and General Manager. He actually coordinates a lot of areas, like scouting, personnel decisions, etc. He's basically a high level coordinator.
I have no idea what the you're talking about. I have no idea where that stat list came from nor how to find out when it was posted. It's not even clear that it was posted on this message board unless I had rememberd seeing it 3 months ago. Pretty ridiculous to make an assumption that anyone who doesn't spend 24 hours a day on this board (like yourself) would know that was posted here. This is a faulty assumption you make (more on that later). And that's not even the point. The point I made is if its so "damn easy" to look up the stats why didn't you lambast WeNeedLength for not being able to find a current up to date list? If Fabbs deserves to be pulled over and ticketed then surely this deserves at least a written warning. Right mr forum cop?How would you know? You didn't even try.
lol cops
No, I spent all afternoon trying to correct your mul udes of faulty assumptions and sidetracking that you always do every time you run into a dead end.
It was so easy WeNeedLength didn't bother doing it, and neither did you. Funny that, huh?
Ain't that the truth.
You can't even understand the passage of time.
And having an debate with you is like trying to chase a friggin' squirrel across the lawn and smack it over the head with a bat.
You can't even understand the passage of time.
Re: How many minutes have Chump and TJ logged together?
I take it you never played whack-a-mole before?
Has bigmen combo minutes as of Feb 10th.
No link tho.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
