This is why I don't waste my time with long threads^
Flame away
They didn't fail to follow up, they deliberately decided not to follow up
It's also gonna be interesting if it's uncovered that daddeh being a judge got him off the hook for an arrest (since he had 3) that, if the charges stuck, woulda prevented him from being able to carry a gun.
Very telling....even more so since wing-nuts have clung to the 'Zimmerman is a hispanic' talking point....it's disgusting really..
Bham....there you have it, the FBI isn't just investigating Zimmerman, they are investigating the locals to...rightly so, this case was handled very, very poorly and now it's blown up in their face...They didn't fail to follow up, they deliberately decided not to follow up
Oh, yes, because if someone gets investigated, they must have done something criminal. You've actually decided that a police report was faked, because it's being investigated. That's every bit as bad as saying "the kid was black and wearing a hoodie, so he must be a criminal.
You moonbats ARE the exact thing you claim to hate so much. ing Nazis among us.
thinking that's even close to the same thing.
Do legitimate police reports generally get investigated by the FBI?
Does the FBI ever investigate something, and find that no crime was committed?
Do legitimate police reports generally get investigated by the FBI?
When getting investigated is equal to a guilty verdict, we're all ed. You too.
(someone is gonna feel stupid when it comes out how poorly this was investigated)
Answer my question first and I'll answer that.
When walking down the street in a hoody gives someone a justifiable reason to pursue you and kill you if you try to fight back, we're REALLY ed.
This stinks of corruption....
http://rollingout.com/culture/george...losed-arrests/According to a records search on George, he was previously arrested for domestic violence, resisting an officer without violence and most shockingly, resisting an officer with violence — a felony charge that surely could have landed him in prison.
All three of those arrests, however, were mysteriously closed with no semblance of charges for the Florida resident. So how was someone with a violent past including that of battery against an officer able to carry a 9 mm handgun? Maybe that’s a question Robert Zimmerman should answer …
Despite these charges this guy was still granted a CCW? What the Florida?
There weren't any charges.
That kinda stuff can happen when daddeh is a judge
No wonder this guy thought he was dirty harry....
There there multi.
"Your honor, I'd like to move for that....contingency......thing."
If there are facts to back it up, I say fry 'em. I've always said that. I just wait for facts to decide. Even if it comes out that they guy is guilty, and the investigation was handled poorly, you guys are still Nazis.
Like I sasid, bigger forces are at work here.
Yes we are. Hale Hitler!
....so much for FAUX News star 'anonymous witness'...should have known that was bull ...
http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/cri...witnesses.wkmg
Now if you were only smart enough to understand what that means. It means that it all hinges on which one actually attacked the other. It means that if Trayvon really attacked Zimmerman first, that Zimmerman is not guilty. Or, if Zimmerman did something to Trayvon that can be considered an attack, then he's guilty as . Exactly what I've sad from the start.
But you don't know those facts, do you? There appears to have been enough evidence at the scene to make the police think Zimmerman may have been telling the truth. If he wasn't, fry his ass. You want so badly to find a way to justify the fact that you made up your mind without any evidence. But you're not going to justify your lynch mob mentality, no matter what you say.
LOL... once again, you idiot, you don't know the facts. That "witness" has re-vamped her story twice now. She's not the one they have been talking about on Fox. That one, apparently, described a man in red laying on the ground, getting the pounded out of him. Trayvon wasn't wearing red. You keep jumping to stupid conclusions, because you want so badly for it to come out the way you've already decided.
For the record, this woman handed a written statement to the police (through her sister) the night it happened. That statement was very different from the one she is making now. I don't know whether she was lying before, or if she's lying now. I just think it's good to question when a witness changes their story.
I'm sure it doesn't bother you at all.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/n...tory?track=rssAngela B. Corey, a veteran prosecutor, said she is well aware of the public's demands for answers in the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin in what has become a racially charged case triggering nationwide outrage.
"We stepped into this case Thursday night," Corey told The Times. "We're asking -- we're begging people -- just give us a chance."
In a sign of how feverishly her team is working on the case, Corey said her probe could possibly result in state charges that bypass the need for the Seminole County Grand Jury, which is slated to convene April 10 to hear the case.
"It's possible that we’ll just make a decision without the grand jury," she said.
Do your own homework before you pick fight here......FAUX news only identifies the witness in their story as 'John'...a ' an anonymous witness'....where are these witnesses original statements? or are you just repeating hearsay?That one,
You can not write off Zimmerman's original actions as simply being a misunderstanding. The kid was doing absolutely nothing to reasonably cause Zimmerman to claim he must be on drugs and su ious.
Um...is that your eyewitness account?
No, it's the fact that the Zimmerman described behavior during the 911 call that gave no legitimate reason for him to be su ious.
Zimmerman claimed that the teen "looked like he was up to no good." Subjective? Absolutely. Flimsy excuse to pursue this guy on foot? Yep.
Can ploto say with absolute certainty that TM did NOTHING to warrant ANY su ion? No.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
