Page 8 of 11 FirstFirst ... 4567891011 LastLast
Results 176 to 200 of 263
  1. #176
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    As OV stated, when he can't make his 3s, the rest of his flaws become magnified.
    My contention continues to be that the more he's on the floor, the more his flaws become magnified. When he's getting regular rotation minutes where a playoff team can scout him and exploit him possession after possession, he simply can't make enough shots to make up for it. Pop came up with a way to keep teams from exploiting Jacque Vaughn on offense, and Bonner's a bigger liability in the playoffs defensively than JV ever was.

  2. #177
    Relax, It's just a game... But we better win!
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    673
    Bonner was like their 8th most important player and deserves the 8th most blame. Oddly, I don't think that's the ratio of blame he's getting.

    When you all start the "Tim and Tony have to play much better these playoffs" thread, I'll take note.

    Bonner was like 5% of the problem and gets 50% of the blame.
    I agree with you Roycrikside, it would have been completely agree if you had said that Bonner gets MORE than 50% of the blame.

  3. #178
    Veteran roycrikside's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    1,525
    Nobody said you did, strawman. You're defending Bonner getting more PT than Splitter, though, and when you point out how much worse the defense is with Splitter on the floor, you really do come dangerously close to what you just said you didn't do.
    I didn't say the defense was worse with Splitter on the floor. It wasn't. It was 1.5 points per 100 possessions better.

    What I said was they got outscored worse with Splitter on the floor.

    If you want to look at it another way it's this:

    Difference in offense w/Bonner vs. w/Splitter > difference in defense w/Splitter vs. w/Bonner.

    Hope that helps.

  4. #179
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Splitter's minutes were always basically going to equal 48 minutes minus Tim Duncan's minutes. Before the trades and signings, Splitter was getting very erratic time next to TD ... which averaged out to less than three minutes per game. And for weeks prior to the trades and signings, Pop had already given up on Duncan and Splitter; it only made an appearances if there was foul trouble or injury.
    No doubt. That's entirely on Pop though, and how he sees Splitter and/or his focus on offense.

    In the playoffs, the only chance Splitter is going to play with Duncan is if Pop does it to match a big lineup. IMO, that has been the case all season and remains the case. So really, I don't think Splitter's situation has changed enough to say his role got bigger or small.
    Well, I disagree. Remove Diaw and if Blair pulled a Casper act like last season, small ball would've been first in line, and Tiago second in line. Now Diaw would be ahead of Tiago for those situations.
    Now, I don't have a problem with Diaw, but I much rather see Tiago out there than him, tbh.

    Overall though, there's no doubt that the bigman situation is better than it's been all season. While I want Duncan and Splitter together as much as anyone, having the option to turn to Diaw or smallball with Jack is better than living or dying with Bonner and Blair.
    But, again, that's on Pop being Pop. There's no reason why we would need to die with any of that instead of, say, Tiago.

    Disagree that Pop is a "pecking order" coach. Nazr hopped to the front of the line back in 2005 even though he didn't even enter the rotation until April.
    You're obviously omitting that Nazr hopped to the front line after Rasho was injured...

    Even Glenn Robinson got run in the postseason after signing in the final few days of the regular season.
    Who was signed due to Devin Brown going down with an injury...

    In 2006, Finley immediately became a Pop favorite -- even ahead of champions like Horry and Barry.
    Finley, I agree, but he was a special case as Matty is. Pop just loved the guy. He loved him so much, Fin ended up robbing Hill minutes when Hill should've been on the floor.

    In 2008, Kurt Thomas started playoff games even though he was acquired at the trade deadline.
    Thomas replaced Elson, who was shipped out on the trade... we also played the Shaq's Suns and Thomas was the only guy that could guard him not named Tim.

    In 2009, Drew Gooden had a large run down the stretch of the season.
    But barely played in the postseason...

    If you want to go back further, Pop benched AJ and Elliott for two newbies in Terry Porter and Danny Ferry back in 2001. Pop sometimes makes the wrong decisions on who to play but I disagree it's because he believes in a pecking order.
    I don't think he's stubborn enough not to change his selection of players if they're sucking (see RJ, Blair last playoffs). But going in, I do think his picks are mostly based on pecking order than anything else. I almost expect it these days.

  5. #180
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Tbh, Pop not even attempting to play Duncan and Splitter together for the last two years is one of the dumbest things he's ever done. Other than that, I think Pop has been a great coach this year. But that flaw in strategy is so glaring that it's difficult to look past it.

    I mean, at some point in the last two seasons, why not make it a point to play Splitter a lot next to Duncan for about a week to see if it works? I'm not even saying to start Splitter necessarily ... just play them together for a few games in a row to get a better feel on whether or not it's an avenue worth exploring further.

    Pop's reluctance to even try it so damn baffling . . .
    Agree

  6. #181
    Believe. maverick1948's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Post Count
    1,170
    Tiago Splitter says hi from the bench. Ian Mahinmi says hi from the NBA finals.
    Ian had nothing to do with the Mav's getting the finals.

  7. #182
    Veteran roycrikside's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    1,525
    I don't think anyone is saying they weren't bad. It's not just about last year. He's never been reliable in the playoffs. Ever.
    I can buy that argument. I'm just saying compared to 2009 and 2010, last year's postseason was actually a step in the right direction for poor Matt. And Pop says he's playing his best ball ever now, so I guess I'm trying to be optimistic for this postseason.

    I've made my preferences clear. If it was up to me Bonner would be the 4th big man and Blair would be out of the rotation.

  8. #183
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    oh, btw, and it's not all negative... I like the moves the team made. Switching RJ for Jack is a fairly big fix on the perimeter...

  9. #184
    Veteran roycrikside's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    1,525
    Tbh, Pop not even attempting to play Duncan and Splitter together for the last two years is one of the dumbest things he's ever done. Other than that, I think Pop has been a great coach this year. But that flaw in strategy is so glaring that it's difficult to look past it.

    I mean, at some point in the last two seasons, why not make it a point to play Splitter a lot next to Duncan for about a week to see if it works? I'm not even saying to start Splitter necessarily ... just play them together for a few games in a row to get a better feel on whether or not it's an avenue worth exploring further.

    Pop's reluctance to even try it so damn baffling . . .
    There's nothing to be baffled about. He's stubborn as a mule. He's never gotten over himself and he's surrounded by a yes man coaching staff. All that being said, I think Pop may try the Splitter-Duncan combo against LA or Memphis, if it comes to that. I don't think match-up wise it makes much sense against other teams.

    When it comes to people who play on the high post or the wings though, like Dirk or even Gasol and Randolph for the most part, I think Pop would be more confident that Diaw could guard them out there than Splitter or Tim. He wants those guys to protect the basket and be the main shot blocker/rebounder.

  10. #185
    Inthe land of audiophiles angelbelow's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    9,560
    Thomas replaced Elson, who was shipped out on the trade... we also played the Shaq's Suns and Thomas was the only guy that could guard him not named Tim.
    Further, Thomas was suddenly benched against the Lakers. Two issues that I remember from that series was struggling to score and being out rebounded. Thomas may not have helped offensively but rebounding is a different story.

    Maybe Odom and Gasol were a bad match up for Duncan and Thomas... but I don't see how Oberto or Horry were any better. Horry was pretty dreadful after the Phoenix series.

  11. #186
    Believe. maverick1948's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Post Count
    1,170
    There's nothing to be baffled about. He's stubborn as a mule. He's never gotten over himself and he's surrounded by a yes man coaching staff. All that being said, I think Pop may try the Splitter-Duncan combo against LA or Memphis, if it comes to that. I don't think match-up wise it makes much sense against other teams.

    When it comes to people who play on the high post or the wings though, like Dirk or even Gasol and Randolph for the most part, I think Pop would be more confident that Diaw could guard them out there than Splitter or Tim. He wants those guys to protect the basket and be the main shot blocker/rebounder.

    You haven't gotten yet have you Roycrikside? If Timmy goes 1 for 12 and Bonner goes 5 for 6 on 3pt shots and the Spurs lose, it was Bonner's fault for letting someone score and not making that 3 pt shot. It matters little what Bonner does, the people on this board are going to slam him. He blocks out on rebounds, he makes the extra pass to the open man, he makes 3's and drives the bucket, he draws fouls and lately he has blocked a few shots and against Indiana, he even cause an adjustment on a shot from behind, he plays defense and then is blamed when Tiago leaves his man open to chase a guard who then gets an easy assist on Tiago's man's basket. YOU cant win with these guys. Bonner is a convienent scapegoat for their outlet to blame.

  12. #187
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    42,233
    Shut up, grey got.

  13. #188
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    2,065
    You haven't gotten yet have you Roycrikside? If Timmy goes 1 for 12 and Bonner goes 5 for 6 on 3pt shots and the Spurs lose, it was Bonner's fault for letting someone score and not making that 3 pt shot. It matters little what Bonner does, the people on this board are going to slam him. He blocks out on rebounds, he makes the extra pass to the open man, he makes 3's and drives the bucket, he draws fouls and lately he has blocked a few shots and against Indiana, he even cause an adjustment on a shot from behind, he plays defense and then is blamed when Tiago leaves his man open to chase a guard who then gets an easy assist on Tiago's man's basket. YOU cant win with these guys. Bonner is a convienent scapegoat for their outlet to blame.
    What's your point?

    Nobody and I mean *nobody* is disputing Bonner's regular season effectiveness. In fact, nobody's blaming him for playing too many minutes. That's mostly on Pop.

    The truth of the matter is that Bonner is getting minutes ahead of and at the expense of better players who could clearly help the team in the playoffs. Since no decently defending team is going to leave Bonner wide open beyond the arc, the team will essentially be playing him for his defense and rebounding. That won't fly and everybody who understands basketball knows it.

    When you have a Spanish League MVP sitting on the bench who is taller, better, stronger, and faster, that just makes people feel even worse about the situation. Tiago is a player. Bonner is a specialist. No matter how hard you try, you can't use them the same way successfully.

    So you see, it's not that people are blaming Bonner for losing the series. In most cases they're just pointing out his limitations and getting mad because we all know that this team has the pieces to win it all.

    What you're seeing is fans who are losing confidence in the coach's ability to maximize the players he has.

  14. #189
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    18,794
    Spurs have to hope Bonner can do something he's never done before: hit shots consistently in the playoffs, especially in crunch time. Because right now, despite all of the (what appears to be obvious) analysis, the history shows Pop is going to roll with Bonner. It's not that you can't win in the playoffs with Bonner - it's that you can't win with how Bonner has performed in the playoffs vs the regular season.
    I don't even recall Bonner hitting a shot in the 4th quarter of last night's game? I don't think he can even hit shots consistently in the 4th quarter of regular season games. I'd like to see stats on his 4th quarter shooting in the regular season. The fact that I can't recall many makes in those situations is what makes it so tough to even think about him playing in the playoffs.

    I didn't say the defense was worse with Splitter on the floor. It wasn't. It was 1.5 points per 100 possessions better.

    What I said was they got outscored worse with Splitter on the floor.

    If you want to look at it another way it's this:

    Difference in offense w/Bonner vs. w/Splitter > difference in defense w/Splitter vs. w/Bonner.

    Hope that helps.
    I'd actually like to know how many times the guy Bonner was guarding scored on him during the Memphis series.

  15. #190
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    6,599
    pop not playing splitter kind of reminds me of stan van gundy never playing gortat next to dwight howard. a gortat/howard frontcourt would have been so dominant but for some reason van gundy never put gortat next to howard.

  16. #191
    Veteran roycrikside's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    1,525
    I could be wrong (would hardly be the first time) but it seems to me that Pop knows nothing he can do will make this team that good defensively, so he's just gonna throw a hail mary that he can outscore everyone.

    Like TimVP has pointed out numerous times, the Stephen Jackson trade was more about economics than basketball, but at least you know Jack won't turn down open threes and he can also earn an occasional trip to the FT line, so overall he'll be more useful than RJ was. Similarly, Diaw and Mills are both guys who are better offensively than defensively.

    I think Pop wants to put lineups out there where regardless of who's playing all 5 guys can score and won't be afraid to shoot and take his chances that way, hoping that the efficiency and smart play of the big three down the stretch of games will be enough.

    Maybe he's saying something different behind closed doors, but there have been too many games where the Spurs have allowed over 105 pts and over 50% shooting and Pop has told the media that he's happy with the defense for me to think he gives a about it. All he cares about on that end of the floor is we rebound well and don't allow a ton of points in the paint. If guys hit open jump shots he doesn't care.

  17. #192
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    18,794
    pop not playing splitter kind of reminds me of stan van gundy never playing gortat next to dwight howard. a gortat/howard frontcourt would have been so dominant but for some reason van gundy never put gortat next to howard.
    That's an interesting comparison. Didn't Gortat totally beast in the games that Dwight didn't play where he was out due to suspension in the playoffs?

    It's kind of hard to look into that situation though because of Jameer Nelson returning for the finals. I didn't watch that finals series closely so I don't know if it was a lack of size or Jameer being reinserted back into the starting five that threw the team out of whack.

    You could also look at the previous teams the Magic had to beat going into the finals, Boston without KG and also Cleveland who didn't really have any great big men. Their small ball strategy seemed to work, but then they had to play the Lakers who had size and they got beaten easily. For those of you that watched, could the Magic have used more size in that series?
    Last edited by Ice009; 04-01-2012 at 10:37 PM.

  18. #193
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    2,065
    That's an interesting comparison. Didn't Gortat totally beast in the games that Dwight didn't play where he was out due to suspension in the playoffs?
    Yeah. I would actually argue that he's a better positional defender than Howard. Excellent player with pretty solid fundamentals. My memory is pretty fuzzy though but I think I can see why Gortat/Howard didn't play together.

    I don't think either of them can shoot and I'm not sure either of them can comfortably guard the perimeter. They're both clearly C's so I get where Van Gundy was coming from somewhat although he probably should've tried that line-up more often.

    I'm going off of impressions though so I could be wrong. I don't really think that this Duncan/Splitter situation is quite the same thing although it's possible Pop thinks it is.

  19. #194
    Inthe land of audiophiles angelbelow's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    9,560
    That's an interesting comparison. Didn't Gortat totally beast in the games that Dwight didn't play where he was out due to suspension in the playoffs?
    Both Gortat and Howard are liabilities on offense when double teamed. The Orlando offense was basically 4 shooters spreading the floor for Dwight Howard. Playing Gortat over Lewis or Hedo would have been devastating for their offense and goes against everything that Stan was preaching. IMO, that is why we never saw a Howard and Gortat twin tower combination. Additionally, Gortat's improvement on offense this season is a symbiotic relationship with Steve Nash.

    You haven't gotten yet have you Roycrikside? If Timmy goes 1 for 12 and Bonner goes 5 for 6 on 3pt shots and the Spurs lose, it was Bonner's fault for letting someone score and not making that 3 pt shot. It matters little what Bonner does, the people on this board are going to slam him. He blocks out on rebounds, he makes the extra pass to the open man, he makes 3's and drives the bucket, he draws fouls and lately he has blocked a few shots and against Indiana, he even cause an adjustment on a shot from behind, he plays defense and then is blamed when Tiago leaves his man open to chase a guard who then gets an easy assist on Tiago's man's basket. YOU cant win with these guys. Bonner is a convienent scapegoat for their outlet to blame.
    Lol you're just as bad as a blind Bonner hater. Why don't you try reading the thread before charging head first to Bonner's defense.

  20. #195
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Post Count
    6,778
    Bonner improved offensively in the playoffs last year but he's still not a winning player. I still think this quote from last year sums it up best:

    To top it all off . . .

    When the Spurs have won in the playoffs, they've done it IN SPITE of Bonner's garbage play.

    They beat Dallas last year when Bonner for the series shot 35% from the field and 31% from 3pt. He was -16 for the series. He failed every way, he bricked open threes, bricked contested threes, and passed up open threes.

    When it matters most, the postseason, he's never helped the Spurs win anything, ever.

    He's been carried by the rest of the team.

    How Pop became convinced that it wouldn't be fair to the team to sit Bonner at the end of the bench where he belongs is one of the great mysteries.

    We need Ludden to write a Jack McCallum-style book about this team. Call it "Spreading the Floor: the Spurs Road to Failure".

  21. #196
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    18,794
    Both Gortat and Howard are liabilities on offense when double teamed. The Orlando offense was basically 4 shooters spreading the floor for Dwight Howard. Playing Gortat over Lewis or Hedo would have been devastating for their offense and goes against everything that Stan was preaching. IMO, that is why we never saw a Howard and Gortat twin tower combination. Additionally, Gortat's improvement on offense this season is a symbiotic relationship with Steve Nash.
    I've seen Gortat hit the jumper in Phoenix off of a Nash pass, but don't know if he had that in the arsenal when he was in Orlando.

    Did you watch the finals series with the Lakers? Did the Lakers size beat the Magic? Was that the main reason for the loss or was it Jameer throwing the whole team out of whack by coming back?

    Edit : Also, does anyone have Bonner's stats in 4th quarter and OT games this season?

  22. #197
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    I didn't say the defense was worse with Splitter on the floor. It wasn't. It was 1.5 points per 100 possessions better.

    What I said was they got outscored worse with Splitter on the floor.

    If you want to look at it another way it's this:

    Difference in offense w/Bonner vs. w/Splitter > difference in defense w/Splitter vs. w/Bonner.

    Hope that helps.
    No, you're still coming off as a dumbass. Splitter came in with no time with anyone, no wind and still managed to be the most effective big on the team in the playoffs. You're splitting hairs on tiny differences compared to a Bonner who had several years with the team and acting like your stats mean something. They don't. Splitter has proven to be a far better player than Bonner on both ends of the floor.

  23. #198
    Veteran roycrikside's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    1,525
    No, you're still coming off as a dumbass. Splitter came in with no time with anyone, no wind and still managed to be the most effective big on the team in the playoffs.
    Based on what?

    You're splitting hairs on tiny differences compared to a Bonner who had several years with the team and acting like your stats mean something. They don't. Splitter has proven to be a far better player than Bonner on both ends of the floor
    Based on what? If you just write things without showing me some proof, what substance is there?

  24. #199
    Inthe land of audiophiles angelbelow's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    9,560
    I've seen Gortat hit the jumper in Phoenix off of a Nash pass, but don't know if he had that in the arsenal when he was in Orlando.

    Did you watch the finals series with the Lakers? Did the Lakers size beat the Magic? Was that the main reason for the loss or was it Jameer throwing the whole team out of whack by coming back?

    Edit : Also, does anyone have Bonner's stats in 4th quarter and OT games this season?
    Too hard to judge because he didn't take many jump shots with the Magics but I'd imagine that it wasn't a consistent weapon of his. In the 2009 Nba playoffs, Gortat took 81% of his shots from inside (averaged 2.4 pts) and 19% jumps (averaged .4 pts).

    I did watch some of the Laker Magic finals with some buddies, but was too distracted or indifferent to pay attention. But it was the clear that the Lakers were the superior team in skill, depth, preparation, talent and coaching. They were able to lock down the 4 perimeter shooters and have big enough bodies to defend Dwight 1v1. No surprise that they Lakers won so easily.

    I think Timvp posted some good stuff regarding Bonner's clutch performance during the regular season. (A few pages back in this thread)
    Last edited by angelbelow; 04-02-2012 at 02:05 AM.

  25. #200
    I'm poplovin' it! TJastal's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    7,725
    The same exact thing was said last year as an excuse for Pop not playing Tiago and Tim together.

    Then Pop had to scramble and put in Tiago in Game 4 when he finally realized Tim was getting abused out there by a bigger and more physical frontline and Bon Bon began to shrink away.

    It was the exact scenario that many people had been warning against when the Spurs were racking up Ws in the regular season while not giving more time to a Tim/Tiago pairing when Pop had EVERY opportunity to do so last year. The same is happening this year. Pop's been great at managing minutes and the rotation but his failure once again to integrate a Tiago/Tim lineup is absolutely inexcusable.

    I honestly can't understand how Popfans can still make the same old excuses for Pop not playing Tiago after witnessing the Memphis series last year.
    I strongly disagree here.

    History tells us having dual 7-foot defenders in the paint has always been such a drag and recipe for failure, especially for the spurs. Plus there could be a mul ude of other reasons, too. Let's give Pop the benefit of the doubt, here. Could be Tim is allergic to Tiago's aftershave and Tiago can't switch brands because it was a gift from a special girl. And he's like, all supersticious and . Or Tiago cheated with Timmy's wife and when Tim confronted Tiago in the practice there was a huge fight and Pop had to drag them apart. Now Pop has to keep em separated on the court. See how that works? Listen to spectator, man. Since we just don't know the details we should assume there is something Pop knows that we don't.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •