Reply With Quote
I've added some college senior prospects profile. If I've made some mistakes and/or if you want to talk about other college seniors, just let me know.
International prospects and underclassmen will be added shortly.
Oh don't get me started on Cory Joseph!
I've added some college senior prospects profile. If I've made some mistakes and/or if you want to talk about other college seniors, just let me know.
International prospects and underclassmen will be added shortly.
Thanks again.
pls dont waste another pick on a pg...i prefer the spurs sign a vet pg who can hold down the fort
we dont have time to be testing raw pgs and developing them, when we are win mode for the next 2-3 years with the way this team has been playin for the last few seasons, we are just another regular season team +50 wins + first round exit, address the needs of this team first, that is a fkn big who could come in and contribute or look for a serviceable big through FA...
Well just created this thread because to many players to look through and figured we could narrow down our first rounder easier.
The players who I think will be there as far as talent and also need are the following:
Tony Wroten -PG/SG - 6'5 W.A
Tomas Satoransky PG/SG - 6'6 Czech Republic
Jeffrey Taylor - SF - 6'7 Vanderbilt
Kevin Jones- PF - 6'8 - West Virgina
Quincy Miller - PF/SF 6'9 - Baylor
Festus Ezil - C - 6/11 - Vanderbilt
So if GS ends up in the bottom seven then they get to keep there draft pick if not then they have to trade it. So they signed Bogut who has come out and said they will not play him for the season until his broken ankle heals. Add to the fact that they are going to put Curry on ice to see if he can actually get healed and they might make it.
The question I have is if they do get a top seven draft do you see them using our 25th first rounder? Or do you think they will wait when it is not protected?
Draft talks this year should be boring with Spurs first and only pick currently being #57.
They can't wait.
If Spurs make the playoffs, which is likely, Warriors will get Spurs first round pick. They have to take it. They can't decide that they don't want it and rather take Spurs 2013 first round pick.
They can't choose which year's pick to take. Barring a disastrous run that'd leave the Spurs out of the platoff this year,GS will be getting the 20-something pick from the Spurs.
Edit : Bruno beat me to it.
Ok so we trade Anerson and get a second round pick and draft Cesar Lima at PF and then Pick up Lobrek..............I am a happy camper....
Maybe not, spurs have some players they can offer up come draft day like they did last season with Hill..The 1st that comes to mind is Blair and then Neil since he has a great contract. Just a thought, you never know.Draft talks this year should be boring with Spurs first and only pick currently being #57.
So now that Jackson is back I think this is going to impact some players in that know we have a lot of outside shooters. So the question I have does that make someone like Neal/Bonner expendable?
So do anyone see us trading these guys this summer to get back in the first round, or early second round?
NCAA has changed early entry rules for underclassmen:
http://www.draftexpress.com/article/...s-in-2012-3869
It's going to be brutal for the underclassmen to know whether or not hey should stay in college.
...Now if only the spurs could get there hands on a 1st rd pick I might be a little more interested in the 2012 nba draft.
What would you think of trading Stephen Jackson to the Warriors for a first rounder and one of their small forwards? Maybe we can get Richard Jefferson?!
, nice reality check....
Edit : belongs to Jazz (if not top 7) yea.
Don't you think that the Spurs will trade for a 1st rounder?Draft talks this year should be boring with Spurs first and only pick currently being #57.
Or crackpot theory : the Spurs trade TP for an unprotected lottery pick, hoping they can get AD in a remake of 97 or worst case a project PF they really like.
Getting a first round pick isn't that easy. Teams have to give up something good to get it and Spurs won't have a reason to do so unless they fall in love with a specific draft prospect..
Hm the thing is we have almost too many players right now, sure Anderson may leave and we have no garantee we'll be able to resign Green or Mills but we have good players on cheap contracts like Blair and Neal that we may afford to trade.
I mean if we want to make the team significantly better next year it means upgrading the PF position. Being deep is fine but in the PO it doesn't matter as much so we may try getting rid of one of our PF for a pick just to make room.
I have no problem with trading BLair and/or Neal but I don't think it will get you a first round pick. Their trade value is pretty low.
Ok thanks, really value your opinion on the matter.
Unless Neal has another clutch playoff performance, I think Mills makes him redundant IMO. I also think he'll be looking for a bigger deal (rightfully so) in a year, so I can see him being packaged in a move to acquired a first rounder. Then again Spurs need to make sure Mills picks up that option...
I disagree. Neal and Blair play at levels above their current contracts. Even Blair, for all his inconsistency this year, still outperforms several of his peers from his draft class dollar for dollar. I'm not saying either alone would fetch a top 15 pick like Hill, but if someone the Spurs like is still around between in the early 20s, who knows.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
