Its not racism cause i used stats!
Its not eugenics cause we only tie it to govrernment aid.
And
Thats 4 ignores. I keep my replies to him generally short precisely because I wnat others to see. Lets see how long he holds up this time.
Started on the concrete, ended up in the grass?
Many a physical squabble moves around a bit.
Its not racism cause i used stats!
Its not eugenics cause we only tie it to govrernment aid.
And
Thats 4 ignores. I keep my replies to him generally short precisely because I wnat others to see. Lets see how long he holds up this time.
It doesn't?
tbh the legal laws, by the time both sides get thru twisting the laws around it becomes as one lawyer told me: "The way all trials end up. Merely both sides lawyers arguing about words".
At any rate Fuzzy, this is the land where Casey Anthony walks free. OJ walks free for offing Nicole Brown but then gets wrung up and jailed for trying to retrieve memorabilia.(Not that i mind the latter. In fact i loved it).
Sure i guess maybe he hit the curb. I don't know all of the testimony and he is innocent until proven guilty but the affidavit clearly disagrees with him saying he was trying to get into his car.
thinking a post on a forum saves face.
thinking you zinged anyone.
thinking marketing doesn't affect you in any way
thinking the photo of Martin wasn't a deliberate marketing manuever
believing that if you don't care about a situation, then no one should
open minded if they agree with you.
How does one stand his ground by starting the fight? The law means that you do not have to try to escape if someone comes after you.
That was from an affirmative action discussion. Way to go
So you want me to find other examples of his racist . He was claiming he never said that. I just demonstrated that he did.
Someone else has a quote in his sig where he says he quotes WC saying knows some black people and likes them but because of statistics he does not trust trust black people he doesn't know. I guess i should find that one too.
I don't care why he is racist. Only that he is. It certainly points to his credibility. Given his credo of stats show that black people = bad people it stands to reason that plays a role on what he expects Martin, who is a black person he does not know, would do.
Except that it seems pretty clear to me that the stand your ground law does not apply to him.If he has to twist it around to make it work for him, sounds like a sign of guilt. Lmao look at who you're comparing him to.
You've been making as many assumptions as well
Like what? That the affidavit said that Zimmerman started it or that was Martin's father on tape saying that was his son's voice or that Owens the audio forensics expert said it was a scientific certainty that it was not Zimmerman's voice?
Everything else about who said what i take with a grain of salt even as to what Zimmerman or anyone else said to police. The racist media spin I have ignored from the fbeginning and WC is a well known bigot but he doesn't matter as to anything other than a dumbass trying to come to hos racist conclusions. So what exactly am I making assumptions on?
LOL...
That's what he said?
He thinks he's the , but can't get such simple facts like that strait.
LOL...
He doesn't know the meaning of "if!"
LOL...
LOL...
LOL...
SnC
That was enough comedy. Please don't quote Fuzzbot anymore. I don't have a desire to see his words.
We don't know for a fact who started the fight.
Including you.
offended by a portrait
media conspiracies
intelligent
Sure but that is what the prosecution alleges. As wine reminded me, its by trial that the facts are determined. Its not a good sign that the prosecution states that.
Oh, so you weren't roleplaying as Trayvon and suggesting that it would be common for a young man to confront someone that fails to identify themselves as an authority? I see. Fair enough, your real life sounds quite exciting tbh.
And, judging by the affidavit, it's not a bad thing either...
For all we know, they just made that up ... like when they said the dispatcher told Zimmerman to wait for officers.
rating anyone's intelligence
That would be perjury and as much media attention as this is getting that would be professional suicide.
OTOH, what do confirmation bias mean?
Well, they said it and, if you listen to the entire 911 recording, from beginning to end, nowhere does the dispatcher instruct George Zimmerman to wait. Not once.
From the Affidavit:
Now, scour the 911 call transcript or recording and tell me where the dispatcher tells Zimmerman to wait."The police dispatcher informed Zimmerman that an officer was on the way and to wait for the officer."
You're right, it's perjury.
He said 'we don't need you to do that' and if you listen to the tone it was disapproving. i could see how it could be argued. thats not the same thing as just making something up. I agree that the literal interpretation was not a command but it was obvious the dispatcher was indicating that they did not want him to follow.
the dispatcher does not have the authority to command him to stay where he was anyway so its a moot point. Zimmerman's account is mutually exclusive with the affidavit.
Could be argued that dispatcher was inferring we don't "need" you to do "that". Hence meaning his doing so would be extra effort but not neccessary as a citizen. Which it was. However Zim could take that by then saying to himself "I don't mind, i don't need to stay here where it's safe. I'll go out and see where he went."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)