Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 27
  1. #1
    Believe. Beanzamillion21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Post Count
    641
    I know the Spurs colors are "Silver & Black", but the jerseys and shorts have always been white and black. Miami is already copying the old school Spurs jerseys with the all blacks. What gives? Trend Setters?

    Last edited by Beanzamillion21; 04-24-2012 at 10:41 AM. Reason: edit: Misspelled Brooklyn.

  2. #2
    Veteran Killakobe81's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    36,594
    Spurs have great uniforms, have a great fan-base, a model franchise and two of my favorite non-Lakers of recent years with Manu and TD. In fact, even Parker who I used to detest has grown on me. And of course Pop is the best active coach only thibbs is in the convo ...

    However the Spurs and "swag" really shouldnt be in put in the same sentence ...

  3. #3
    uups stups! Cant_Be_Faded's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    28,114
    Yeah just ask Stephen, Danny, and DeJuan

  4. #4
    Ur a fkn wanker Venti Quattro's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    29,402
    That's only an empty crest and a Twitter hashtag. lol paranoid.

  5. #5
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    The Nets are moving to Brooklyn for what? They're taking a terrible team to a different city, for what? All they're doing is shuffling chairs around on the anic. Putting lipstick on a pig. Call if whatever you want, but moving a bad team to a different town isn't going to suddenly make them winners any more than changing color schemes.

  6. #6
    tv screen baseline bum sananspursfan21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Post Count
    4,558
    The Nets are moving to Brooklyn for what? They're taking a terrible team to a different city, for what? All they're doing is shuffling chairs around on the anic. Putting lipstick on a pig. Call if whatever you want, but moving a bad team to a different town isn't going to suddenly make them winners any more than changing color schemes.
    I know everybodys goal is to improve the team but wasnt it more of just prokov or whatever his name's desire to have a team in brooklyn? I didnt think it had to do with wins directly

  7. #7
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    Brooklin?

  8. #8
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    I know everybodys goal is to improve the team but wasnt it more of just prokov or whatever his name's desire to have a team in brooklyn? I didnt think it had to do with wins directly
    That is correct. Nets owner Mikhail Prokorov, and his compe ive nature, is simply trying to hoarde into the market belonging to the NY Knicks. I'm sure he's trying to carve out his own niche in the premiere basketball market in the United States. However, it doesn't mean a hill of beans because this franchise is terrible.

    Consider this: Last year, in a desparate move for credibility, the Nets mortgaged part of their future (Derrick Favors and a 1st round pick) in exchange fior Deron Williams. If Williams resigns with the Nets this summer, it's a good move. If he leaves, the Nets look very foolish.

    Consider this: The Nets have deluded themselves into believing they have a chance at Dwight Howard. In order to get him, they will need to mortgage part of their future again (Brook Lopez, draft picks, etc.). If they get Howard and Williams resigns, it's a good move. If they fail to land Howard, Williams certainly will leave and the Nets again look foolish.

    If Williams stays and Howard signs, they will have almost nothying to put around the pair and no draft picks to solidify their future. Make no mistake, this team is destined for years of futility - no matter what city they're playing in.

  9. #9
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    43,448
    That's only an empty crest and a Twitter hashtag. lol paranoid.
    Gonna have to agree with Venti on this one.

    Oh look its black, lets sue.

  10. #10
    Big in Japan GSH's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,093
    Why wouldn't they copy the Spurs colors? If you were going to emulate a team, which one would you pick?

  11. #11
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,442
    That is correct. Nets owner Mikhail Prokorov, and his compe ive nature, is simply trying to hoarde into the market belonging to the NY Knicks. I'm sure he's trying to carve out his own niche in the premiere basketball market in the United States. However, it doesn't mean a hill of beans because this franchise is terrible.

    Consider this: Last year, in a desparate move for credibility, the Nets mortgaged part of their future (Derrick Favors and a 1st round pick) in exchange fior Deron Williams. If Williams resigns with the Nets this summer, it's a good move. If he leaves, the Nets look very foolish.

    Consider this: The Nets have deluded themselves into believing they have a chance at Dwight Howard. In order to get him, they will need to mortgage part of their future again (Brook Lopez, draft picks, etc.). If they get Howard and Williams resigns, it's a good move. If they fail to land Howard, Williams certainly will leave and the Nets again look foolish.

    If Williams stays and Howard signs, they will have almost nothying to put around the pair and no draft picks to solidify their future. Make no mistake, this team is destined for years of futility - no matter what city they're playing in.
    You have a tendency to overthink things.

  12. #12
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    You have a tendency to overthink things.
    That's probably true here.

    However, whatever the Nets do, it's still the proverbial "lipstick on a pig".

  13. #13
    The D.R.A. Drachen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    11,214
    The Nets are moving to Brooklyn for what? They're taking a terrible team to a different city, for what? All they're doing is shuffling chairs around on the anic. Putting lipstick on a pig. Call if whatever you want, but moving a bad team to a different town isn't going to suddenly make them winners any more than changing color schemes.
    they could barely sell out the finals.... this is why they are moving. More revenue..... this is why they are moving.

  14. #14
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,442
    That's probably true here.

    However, whatever the Nets do, it's still the proverbial "lipstick on a pig".
    It's for money. No matter what the results on the floor, this team will make more money than in either location in New Jersey. The NBA is a business -- make your money first, then worry about performance.

  15. #15
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Post Count
    18
    http://www.tauntr.com/blog/introduci...yn-new-yorkers

    Brooklyn is not taking our colors scheme

  16. #16
    Chillin' like a villain... TampaDude's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    20,120
    Thassa joke, rite?

  17. #17
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    It's for money. No matter what the results on the floor, this team will make more money than in either location in New Jersey. The NBA is a business -- make your money first, then worry about performance.
    That part is understood. There is no mystery there.

    The Knicks make tons on money, but they've stunk for 20 years. In large part because of incompetent ownership, unstable management and years of questionable personal decisions.

    For the Nets, they should strive to be the anti-Knicks. Organizational stability, solid management and good talent evaluation will dictate whether the Nets can ultimately be successful - no matter how much money they starts to pour into their coffers.

  18. #18
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    That part is understood. There is no mystery there.

    The Knicks make tons on money, but they've stunk for 20 years. In large part because of incompetent ownership, unstable management and years of questionable personal decisions.

    For the Nets, they should strive to be the anti-Knicks. Organizational stability, solid management and good talent evaluation will dictate whether the Nets can ultimately be successful - no matter how much money they starts to pour into their coffers.
    Given the blind loyalty of Jets and Mets (and Knicks) fans, you probably just have to be a second team in New York and can get a segment of fans to latch onto you like a remora until death. They'd probably be smart to just re-adopt the New York Nets name instead of using Brooklyn.

  19. #19
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,442
    That part is understood. There is no mystery there.

    The Knicks make tons on money, but they've stunk for 20 years. In large part because of incompetent ownership, unstable management and years of questionable personal decisions.

    For the Nets, they should strive to be the anti-Knicks. Organizational stability, solid management and good talent evaluation will dictate whether the Nets can ultimately be successful - no matter how much money they starts to pour into their coffers.
    Sooooo....?

  20. #20
    Triple meat, triple cheez DJB's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    1,640

    However the Spurs and "swag" really shouldnt be in put in the same sentence ...
    Are you trying to tell me that Matty RedRocket Bonner isn't the swaggest mother er in the NBA?

  21. #21
    Cinco TimmehC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    1,499

  22. #22
    Chillin' like a villain... TampaDude's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    20,120
    those losers...the Spurs are the Men In Black!!!

  23. #23
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    If thats it above I like it...

  24. #24
    Believe. dylankerouac's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Post Count
    850
    Jay-Z will make the team gold.

  25. #25
    Enemy of the FCC and AMA Dr. John R. Brinkley's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    551
    First, the Nets move to Brooklyn has absolutely nothing to do with winning basketball and everything to do with real estate. Bruce Ratner, the prior owner, had the twisted but cynical idea that to take over a prime piece of real estate in Brooklyn and make it into a huge real estate development he needed to be able to use eminent domain...and by buying the Nets and building a new arena (which obviously is more than an arena, it will have housing and business space) he could manipulate the courts to allow him to take over prime real estate in Brooklyn.

    Ratner achieved that but lost some money along the way and because of the massive resistance to his actions, the time table became extended and he needed to bring in more money. That's where the Russian comes in...he's just another money guy, just like Ratner. This is a business deal that is manipulating the Nets to make it happen.

    The Nets sucked before so they might actually improve from this new move, but that would be coincidence rather than intent.

    So, I don't think the Russian guy has any specific interest in the team. Yeah, he wants high profile players to improve the team's worth, but he's busy with Russian politics. I never heard much of him during the lockout. My assumption was that he didn't really give a crap because it didn't affect his long-term plans.

    Welcome to the new NBA where it's all about building new arenas no matter what.

    This is all to say: thank God the Spurs actually are about basketball and the owner, for all his minor quibbles, is on board for delivering a winning product.

    As Spurs fans, this is just another reason to say we have it good.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •