Reply With Quote
Maybe most of them are eligible Democrats.
Only six responding out of 259 letters... in a county with a 2010 population of 1,748,066...Perez-Verdia said his do ents were received and he won’t be removed.
He was one of six to respond with citizenship proof in Broward, she said, of the 259 letters that went out.
Maybe most of these are ineligible voters.
Maybe most of them are eligible Democrats.
Maybe, maybe most are republicans. If you have the numbers, please post them. Your assumption doesn't count for much.
Neither does yours that they are ineligible voters.
http://cltampa.com/dailyloaf/archive...e#.T8e5Lb-iszCIn addition to the six voters [out of 72 letters sent] who were able to prove to the Hillsborough County Supervisor of Elections office that the state’s database was incorrect, Craig Latimer says it’s possible other registered voters received the certified letter and threw it away.
One voter told him he’d done just that. When Latimer called him, the voter said that he was born in Canada and that when he was very young, his parents came to the United States and obtained citizenship. He became a citizen as well. “‘I served 12 years in the U.S. Navy,’ he told Latimer. ‘I threw your letter away.’”
Latimer said at that point he decided the SOE office would refrain from taking anyone else off the voting rolls.
This whole thing is a big steaming pile of . No wonder WC wants to swallow it whole.
I'm not assuming they are ineligible. The numbers suggest one thing, but I am not one who uses statistics as fact.
I think you guys are missing a valid concern over this. It's one think to require someone show citizenship, but the notice was delivered by first class mail. It should have been certified. There should also be more than the 90 days to show why the state names are wrong. Now... if this guy cannot show he's a citizen, then that's that.
You just did.Why should this particular man be required to show more proof than every other voter who isn't on that list in the first place?I think you guys are missing a valid concern over this. It's one think to require someone show citizenship, but the notice was delivered by first class mail. It should have been certified. There should also be more than the 90 days to show why the state names are wrong. Now... if this guy cannot show he's a citizen, then that's that.
yeah, stuff like data and evidence!
These came from a database with search criteria. The number is really small that the programming kicked out. I wish I knew what criteria they used, but I doubt they will release it.
Your link says that county sent certified letters. The county in the OP didn't, they used first class. That is a concern. These guys aren't even on the same sheet of music.
data and evidence makes statistics.
Statistics don't make fact.
There is a clear difference. Didn't you know that?
What criteria would spit out the name of the man in the OP?
The type of mail doesn't matter at all. WC trying to muddy the waters again.
No, the type of mail does matter. Even certifies isn't good enough because it only requires a signature from someone at the address. It doesn't insure the intended person received it.
Nope, the type of mail does nothing to explain why the man in the OP was on the list in the first place.
The "you aren't the boss of me" defense.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (etc)
Wow, I haven't seen that one used by anybody over the age of ten in a looooong while.
Just, wow.
It isn't a silly game.
It is a debate about a political party directly trying to disenfranchise people who don't belong to that party.
Moreover, it exposes the state to a rather hefty discrimination lawsuit, because hispanics, and those with spanish surnames and spanish-speaking national origins are directly protected classes.
Dude, he is Wild Cobra, not Pet Cobra. You can't tame him, you can only hope to avoid his strikes!
The "you aren't the boss of me" defense.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (etc)
Wow, I haven't seen that one used by anybody over the age of ten in a looooong while.
Just, wow.
You are right. Maybe I should have elaborated. Such actions need to have tracking ability. You can't do that with first class mail. I was actually pointing out a flaw in how they went about this.
Call it what you will, but I try not to play Chump's games.
The "you aren't the boss of me" defense.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (etc)
Wow, I haven't seen that one used by anybody over the age of ten in a looooong while.
Just, wow.
Seriously... can you believe he is suggesting there is no conceivable criteria that they went by?
Is that what your confirmation bias tells you?
I see...
That's why they selected someone with an Italian surname?
lol...
Here, I fixed it. I can't stand the two-toned obviously edited background. At least make fun of me in style.
Two sizes:
What criteria would flag the name of the man in the OP?
I'm serious.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
