Reply With Quote
Something occurring, on average, every 150 years could be described as cyclical.
You're just being argumentative now.
You're right, I had no idea Landsat used remote sensing, exclusively, for it's imaging. If that makes me a moron, so be it.
That still doesn't make the story any less about how much the earth has changed in 40 years. Nor does it make the story about remote sensing -- which isn't exclusive to Landsat or even imaging.
Something occurring, on average, every 150 years could be described as cyclical.
You're just being argumentative now.
i heard of this guy that uses a stick of butter for a thermostat!
I agree.
I'll let one of the geophysicists that roams the board chime in on this.
I will ask you this again however. Do you disagree that tidal forces have an effect on geothermal energy?
Please don't tell me you think the moon only effects the ocean level.
Oh...
Do you know what the barycenter is without looking it up?
With an approximate 39 year cycle for it's position around the sun, how do other planets slightly change it's position to amplify the 39, 78, 117, 156..... year, etc positions?
If you don't know, you should STFU.
Do you know where the barycenter of the earth is?
If you don't know, you should STFU.
barycenter? you talkin about that dc mayor?
when the moon is in the 7th house, and jupiter aligns with mars.....
work that out, !
Wow...
Two consecutive posting from a Peanut gallery member.
Gotta admit, I like you Age of Aquarius one.
Tell me on mighty one. Are we in the age of Aquarius, or the age of Pisces?
you got me worried. we gotta blow up these planets. they're deliberately trying to kill us!
look, you know where all the nukes are........i'll work out the trajectory!
I'm not supporting it.
Read my remarks carefully. I offered it as an unlikely possibility.
I am not a "denier" in that I am not denying anything. Manny is acting as if there is no possible correlation. I'm pointing out that he is the denier.
If I pick a card at random from a deck of 52 cards I'll get an ace on average 1 out of every 13 times. That does not mean there is a cycle. A cycle is something that occurs through a mechanism over and over again on a repeated time frame. IE, the melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet during the glacial interglacial periods is a cycle. The occurrence of period of melt absent of any large cyclical mechanism is NOT a cycle.
Its not about being argumentative its about the ignorance you display when discussing these systems and how you somehow expect to use your poor logic to disprove arguments you do not understand.
A full account is detailed Here
I shut it down as a complete impossibility. I gave you the equation and figures. Thinking that somehow the force that Jupiter exerts is meaningful is so god damn stupid.
LOL...
Relegated down to a definition of cycle. Is that the best you have?
It does not change the fact that these instances occur of a semi-regular basis. Unless you have a good theory for it, I suggest you stop denying hypotheses, no matter how implausible they are. Arbitrarily eliminate possibilities in science like a statistician does with statistical outliers, and you are no longer a scientist.
A living, breathing, Elvis Presley could likely cause some kind of effect as well. I'm not stupid enough to posit it tho.
and lol ing lol at possible correlation from an unlikely possiblitly. smdh.
and I read your ing remarks carefully. PEBKC Problem Exists Between Keyboard and Chair.
My God.
You really are a dolt.
What are you laughing at?
I'm not supporting it.
Read my remarks carefully. I offered it as an unlikely possibility.
I am not a "denier" in that I am not denying anything. Clambake is acting as if there is no possible correlation. I'm pointing out that he is the denier
Ice occasionally melts on Greenland because it occasionally gets warmer there.
Holy that a ground breaking theory I just came up with!
I'll have to consult my astrologer on the best course of action to take now that you've called me an idiot. I'll get back to you once I've been guided by the stars.
A living, breathing, Elvis Presley could likely cause some kind of effect as well. I'm not stupid enough to posit it tho.
and lol ing lol at possible correlation from an unlikely possiblitly. smdh.
and I read your ing remarks carefully. PEBKC Problem Exists Between Keyboard and Chair.
Awesome!
i think its possible that these changes are the result of detroit not making cars with fins anymore.
Theme song anyone....
Wierd Science....
Impossible... Really now? You call that science?
What a ing joke.
I agree it is improbable that the other planets gravity do this. Still, the whole of the solar system does cause barycenter variations at a cycle time of about 39 years. The magnitude of these changes are not constant, because there is no synchronous locking between the planets. Therefore, such forces are weaker curing some cycles and stronger during others.
Same with the earths barycenter. It may only take subtle differences to reach a "tipping point."
Now unless you deniers can show proof of a reason to deny this possibility, then what you say is completely laughable.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
