if we trade jackson and then he gets bought out, could we re-sign him or did the league make a rule to stop that from happening? i can't remember.
I won't speculate on names Spurs could target because these are just wild speculations but Jackson $10M expiring contract is a relatively nice trade asset. Spurs could too have some trade talks including Bonner and have auditioned T-Mac as a possible stretch PF.
T-Mac
Jax FTW
Now the rule is that you have to wait a year before signing that player again.
Unless we get a killer return on a Jax trade, FO would be stupid to trade him.
finley 2.0 yes
thanks. it used to just be a month iirc. i love jackson and what he brings to the team, i wouldn't like to see him go... but if that's what it takes to get significantly better at the 4, then i guess it's what we'll have to do.
Yeah, I was thinking this too. Brown, Kapono, etc. can be passed off as due diligence/potential camp fodder, but even at this point in his career, you don't bring a name of McGrady's magnitude in unless you're serious. And as has been said by others, there's only reason to believe they'd be serious if they're making a trade. It doesn't necessarily have to involve Jackson, either. As you alluded to, it could be Bonner. It could also be Neal.
Even though I said yesterday that I didn't want him, if they traded Neal and didn't get a perimeter player back, then having him as the 11th-12th man couldn't hurt. He may not be what they need, but even in the state he's in, from a sheer talent standpoint, they could do worse for a fifth wing. Plus, he'd provide another small ball PF option.
If come trade deadline spurs are in the 6-8 seed, they be stupid NOT to trade Jax. It's too good a peice. Plus given iur trackrecord with unreatricted free agents, it would sure up some decent parts while avoiding overpaying to lure a free agent in the summer.
In this respect I think TMac makes sense.
we are all forgetting how much of a better passer T-Mac is than S-Jax. Two things we need in this team are: passing (because Tony can't do it all himself, and Manu's injuries set back ball rotation) and rebounding. T-Mac can fill the passing void.
My point is that it better be a near homerun of a trade to get rid of Jax, who was the only one playing to win towards the end of the OKC series. He plays much much better D than JHo or TMac and can hit that 3 with regularity.
Sjax is a killer, the rest of these guys are pussies.
Do not want. Doesn't address a our need.
forget t-mac...Aguilar is playing in training camp!
I'd trust T-Mac in the playoffs over that scrub Danny Green.....
If he could continue this kind of scoring it would be worth it.
13pts in 35 seconds
thats approx. 26pts in every minute.
could easily avg. 780pts a game if he plays about 30 minutes.
Danny Green @DGreen_14
Wow....
Danny Green @DGreen_14
What just happened??? Woke up to getting hit with a damn freight train
--
Can Green be traded?
Tweet seems a little vague. Anything more to it?
Could Green even be traded he just resigned?
I don't even know if he can be yet, usually you have wait so many months after signing a new contract, not up to par on CBA.
** ESPN Trade Machine lists his trade restriction to Jan 15, 2013
Last edited by ace3g; 09-18-2012 at 10:19 PM.
3 months or December 15, whichever is later.
When did he sign ?
I don't think he is talking about a trade tbh.
ace scared me.I thought we signed T-Mac.
Sign him! Poetic justice. Either he gets a ring or Spurs do not advance past the first round lol.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
