When this will stop?

[spurs_fan_in_exile]

Legitimate Rape

Thankfully these things rarely result in pregnancy.

[Homeland Security]

try abusing one in public and watch the cops haul you're re ed ass off to jail....


and for the record...I know for a fact my dogs eat better than you...in fact I cook for them..Steak, chicken, seafood, potato's and carrots..you name it..I love my dogs more than some people in my family...not all but some...

What makes the dog different from the chicken or the cow whose flesh you feed it?

[DMX7]

Slippery slope! Oh, that straw man is getting ed up!

[russellgoat]

Are you trying to create a false equivalency between this and sexuality? I've seen people make this argument often, and it's pretty easily refuted. I can go ahead and preempt it right now:

sexual & heterosexual activity, when practiced normally & within the bounds of the law, occurs between consenting adults.

In a bestial relationship, only 1 partner would be able to give consent, because the other is an animal and thus incapable of abstract thought, let alone speech.

So, if my su ions are correct and you are trying to establish bestiality and sexuality as legally or morally equivalent, you are pretty clearly incorrect.

Where did I mentioned gay marriage conserva ?

anyway....

Animals are sentient beings just like humans, that is they have the power of perception and a consciousness. An animal experiences pleasure and pain. A person who owns a dog knows if what they do causes pleasure or pain. When we scratch a dogs head we can tell the dog enjoys this, he may roll on his back and let you rub his stomach. Likewise, hitting the dog in the head with a shoe causes pain and the dog will shy away and be fearful in the future.

Animals can not verbally say yes or no to sex in our human languages but they have other ways to show how they feel. Surely a dog who has mounted, say his human lover, experiences pleasure. This is evident because of his orgasm. Female dogs have orgasms too. Once a dog for example realizes you as a sexual being, they show sexual desire quite often: females will sway their tales revealing their swollen vagina's and dry hump the air in front of you, males will become erect and try to mount.

Anyone who is zoo will be aware of when their animals want sex. More importantly, they will respect their animal partner when they do not want sex. Sometimes when you rub your partner down there they will pull away and sit elsewhere. That is how animals show they are either interested or not.

If an animal does not enjoy what is happening to them they will show bodily signs of this: they will tense up, their eyes and ears will move, tails might jitter, and they will pull away. If you continue it could bring painful results: Dogs have powerful teeth and will bite you! Horses can break bones (or worse) with a single kick. Quite simply, it is obvious to see what causes pleasure and pain.

As I said before, the consent issue is really a smoke screen for the icky factor. By and large people are disgusted about the idea so they claim consent is a big issue when in fact it is not. People do many awful things to animals who do not consent to what is being done:

(1) Do animals consent to locking them in a cage?
(2) Do animals consent to being slaughtered and killed in the millions every year for food?
(3) Do animals consent to being tested on by chemicals?
(4) Do animals consent to being 'fixed'?

[Bartleby]

[ChumpDumper]

Where did I mentioned gay marriage conserva ?

anyway....

Animals are sentient beings just like humans, that is they have the power of perception and a consciousness. An animal experiences pleasure and pain. A person who owns a dog knows if what they do causes pleasure or pain. When we scratch a dogs head we can tell the dog enjoys this, he may roll on his back and let you rub his stomach. Likewise, hitting the dog in the head with a shoe causes pain and the dog will shy away and be fearful in the future.

Animals can not verbally say yes or no to sex in our human languages but they have other ways to show how they feel. Surely a dog who has mounted, say his human lover, experiences pleasure. This is evident because of his orgasm. Female dogs have orgasms too. Once a dog for example realizes you as a sexual being, they show sexual desire quite often: females will sway their tales revealing their swollen vagina's and dry hump the air in front of you, males will become erect and try to mount.

Anyone who is zoo will be aware of when their animals want sex. More importantly, they will respect their animal partner when they do not want sex. Sometimes when you rub your partner down there they will pull away and sit elsewhere. That is how animals show they are either interested or not.

If an animal does not enjoy what is happening to them they will show bodily signs of this: they will tense up, their eyes and ears will move, tails might jitter, and they will pull away. If you continue it could bring painful results: Dogs have powerful teeth and will bite you! Horses can break bones (or worse) with a single kick. Quite simply, it is obvious to see what causes pleasure and pain.

As I said before, the consent issue is really a smoke screen for the icky factor. By and large people are disgusted about the idea so they claim consent is a big issue when in fact it is not. People do many awful things to animals who do not consent to what is being done:

(1) Do animals consent to locking them in a cage?
(2) Do animals consent to being slaughtered and killed in the millions every year for food?
(3) Do animals consent to being tested on by chemicals?
(4) Do animals consent to being 'fixed'?

I would consider a marriage license application completed by an animal to be consent. Then it wouldn't be such a big deal.

[Clipper Nation]

The movement behind sexual marriage and other rights is a trememdous example of how canny the communists are.

sexual marriage concerns a tiny part of the population. Self-identified sexuals make up about 3% of the population. A minority of that group is even interested in long-term coupling, and fewer than that to identify said coupling as marriage. Relative to other trends which tend to erode the traditional concept of family, granting recognition to sexual relations would be a pittance.

Son, if it's so meaningless, then you should have no problem with gay marriage being allowed, tbh...

[DMC]

There's nothing special about marriage in and of itself. I don't care what two consenting adults do as long as it doesn't infringe on the rights of others. I used to think sexuality was just a lifestyle choice but if you think back to when you were a kid, there were those kids you knew were sissies, and in reality they were Gay. Maybe they didn't become sexuals but the femininity was there and so it seems sexuality is a combination of choice and desire, just like heterosexuality.

[russellgoat]

i don't care what this guy does in the privacy of his own home but he better not call it marriage

And who the is talking about marriage? I am talking about the RIGHT TO HAVE SEX with animals. I bet you don't give a about animals getting tortured before getting killed so you can eat them. Which is worse, killing and torturing the animal, or letting someone AND THE ANIMAL to have non-violent sexual intercourse. Do you think animals give their consent to be your dinner?

[boutons_deux]

"so it seems sexuality is a ... choice"

false, there is apparently, even definitely, a genetic predisposition to sexuality

===========

Dr Bailey said: “Sexual orientation has nothing to do with choice. Our findings suggest there may be genes at play – we found evidence for two sets that affect whether a man is gay or straight.

“But it is not completely determinative; there are certainly other environmental factors involved. “The study shows that there are genes involved in male sexual orientation.

“Although this could one day lead to a pre-natal test for male sexual orientation, it would not be very accurate, as there are other factors that can influence the outcome.”

Dr Alan Sanders, associate Professor of Psychiatry at Northwestern University, who led the study said that it was it was an 'oversimplification’ to suggest there was a 'gay gene.’

“We don’t think genetics is the whole story. It’s not. We have a gene that contributes to sexuality but you could say it is linked to heterosexuality.

It is the variation.”

The study builds on work by Dr Dean Hamer from the US National Cancer Ins ute in 1993 who also found an area of the x chromosome that he believed was linked to male sexual orientation.

Last year Canadian scientists found that the more older male siblings a man has, the greater change he will be gay.

They believe that the immune response produced by a pregnant mother increases with each son, increasing the odds of producing more feminine traits in the developing brain of the foetus.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/s...rch-finds.html

[russellgoat]

"so it seems sexuality is a ... choice"

false, there is apparently, even definitely, a genetic predisposition to sexuality

===========

Dr Bailey said: “Sexual orientation has nothing to do with choice. Our findings suggest there may be genes at play – we found evidence for two sets that affect whether a man is gay or straight.
“But it is not completely determinative; there are certainly other environmental factors involved. “The study shows that there are genes involved in male sexual orientation.
“Although this could one day lead to a pre-natal test for male sexual orientation, it would not be very accurate, as there are other factors that can influence the outcome.”
Dr Alan Sanders, associate Professor of Psychiatry at Northwestern University, who led the study said that it was it was an 'oversimplification’ to suggest there was a 'gay gene.’
“We don’t think genetics is the whole story. It’s not. We have a gene that contributes to sexuality but you could say it is linked to heterosexuality. It is the variation.”
The study builds on work by Dr Dean Hamer from the US National Cancer Ins ute in 1993 who also found an area of the x chromosome that he believed was linked to male sexual orientation.
Last year Canadian scientists found that the more older male siblings a man has, the greater change he will be gay.
They believe that the immune response produced by a pregnant mother increases with each son, increasing the odds of producing more feminine traits in the developing brain of the foetus.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/s...rch-finds.html

You are in the wrong thread. We are not talking about sexuality here.

[pgardn]

http://www.inquisitr.com/335943/flor...iature-donkey/

Stop the discrimination!!! We must support the rights of people that like to have sex with animals!!!!

Did the animals consent?

Dr. DoLittle...?

[SnakeBoy]

"so it seems sexuality is a ... choice"

false, there is apparently, even definitely, a genetic predisposition to sexuality

===========

Dr Bailey said: “Sexual orientation has nothing to do with choice. Our findings suggest there may be genes at play – we found evidence for two sets that affect whether a man is gay or straight.

“But it is not completely determinative; there are certainly other environmental factors involved. “The study shows that there are genes involved in male sexual orientation.

“Although this could one day lead to a pre-natal test for male sexual orientation, it would not be very accurate, as there are other factors that can influence the outcome.”

Dr Alan Sanders, associate Professor of Psychiatry at Northwestern University, who led the study said that it was it was an 'oversimplification’ to suggest there was a 'gay gene.’

“We don’t think genetics is the whole story. It’s not. We have a gene that contributes to sexuality but you could say it is linked to heterosexuality.

It is the variation.”

The study builds on work by Dr Dean Hamer from the US National Cancer Ins ute in 1993 who also found an area of the x chromosome that he believed was linked to male sexual orientation.

Last year Canadian scientists found that the more older male siblings a man has, the greater change he will be gay.

They believe that the immune response produced by a pregnant mother increases with each son, increasing the odds of producing more feminine traits in the developing brain of the foetus.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/s...rch-finds.html

Someday we will find a cure for this genetic disorder.