Page 6 of 12 FirstFirst ... 2345678910 ... LastLast
Results 126 to 150 of 283
  1. #126
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    Trying to solve an irrational problem with rational solutions seems to be futile.

  2. #127
    The D.R.A. Drachen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    11,214
    Yeah some places are so overpopulated that you shooting them for the count. I've never hunted the boar to eat. Just to help friends get them off their land. But about the weapon. It's just a great rifle. Not much kick at all. Pretty much the same as a .22.

    Buying an auto legally and carrying it legally would set you back atleast $1500.
    , I will take your kills, LOL. A good carnitas made from pork shoulder is awesome.

  3. #128
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Five Things Every Elected Official Should Know About The NRA
    1) The NRA’s Candidates Got Their Clocks Cleaned Last Month: The NRA Political Victory Fund spent a massive $16,554,803.07 seeking to elect its preferred candidates last November. They might have accomplished more by burning the money. Just 0.81 percent of these expenditures benefited a winning candidate.

    2) An NRA Endorsement Is Virtually Useless: According to an analysis of all 1038 NRA endorsements in the 2004-2010 election cycles, the NRA’s endorsement swung the result in just four races — meaning that the chance that an NRA endorsement will be the factor that places a pro-gun candidate in the House is less than 0.4 percent. The analysis also determined that most candidates garner no boost whatsoever for an NRA endorsement, although “Republican challengers who get endorsed when they run against Democratic in bents do about 2 percentage points better than similar candidates who don’t get the endorsement.”

    3) Democrats Gain Nothing From Pandering To The NRA
    : One group that has nothing to gain from appeasing the NRA is Democrats. The 2004-2010 analysis mentioned above found that “Democratic in bents who are endorsed by the NRA get no statistically significant advantage from being endorsed,” and a similar study of the 1994 and 1996 election cycles determined that an NRA endorsement “had almost no impact for Democrats who were endorsed, Republican in bents who were endorsed, or any kind of candidate in 1996.”

    4) Gun Ownership Is Steadily Declining
    : Lawmakers hoping to appeal to gun owners are reaching out to a steadily dwindling base. In 1977, 54 percent of American adults lived in a gun-owning household. By 2010, that figure declined to 32 percent:

    5) Not Even NRA Members Believe All Gun Regulations Are Wrong
    : NRA members overwhelmingly support a wide range of reforms, including requiring criminal background checks on gun owners and gun shop employees, and mandating that gun-owners tell the police when their gun is stolen.

    http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...about-the-nra/


  4. #129
    Great Spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds. Fernando TD21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Post Count
    1,196
    I really enjoy shooting semi-automatic assault rifles. No other tangible reason, really.

    a) I can afford them, b) theyre legal to own and c) theyre a uva lot of fun kit up.

    Its a hobby, nothing more. Dystopian future means nothing to me, although I will say out loud that it troubles me that in a country where your right to privacy is being bombarded by your government and large corporate data miners, the only people with the assault rifles would be law enforcement and the military. If civil unrest were to happen (extremely unlikely), the citizen NOT having assault rifles would be akin to the Colonists not owning muskets. The difference in sheer firepower with one side having assault rifles and the other having hunting rifles and handguns would be...one sided to say the least.

    But ultimately, thats a philosophical viewpoint, not one rooted in current reality. Flippantly, I own property waaaaaay up north where I could shoot short range artillery if I were certified and trained to do so (yes, you can get certified to own and operate privately). Assault rifles are just a whooooole lot of fun to operate.
    Nice to see someone being honest about it and admitting to own weapons just because it's legal and fun.

    The US isnt the only place in the world where assholes attack defenseless children, but it is one of the only countries that a mass murderer can acquire the weapons to exponentially increase their lethality and body count.

  5. #130
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    Trying to solve an irrational problem with rational solutions seems to be futile.
    This.

    We can turn schools into fortresses and the kooks will just find some other soft target to strike. Thinking that future incidents can be prevented by stricter gun laws or by arming teachers and principals are equally naive. There is no good answer here.

  6. #131
    Veteran cantthinkofanything's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    14,938
    Violent video games have nothing to do with anything. Violence in media has nothing to do with anything. I dont know why people do what they do, but if I had to guess, the trend was set by Columbine. The US isnt the only place in the world where assholes attack defenseless children, but it is one of the only countries that a mass murderer can acquire the weapons to exponentially increase their lethality and body count.

    Its a conundrum, IMO. But listening to the news, radio, TV and newspapers, even sports radio where you get a ton of callers (general public), in a place like Michigan where gun rights mean something, the writing is on the wall. Assault rifles in the hands of private citizens will be a thing of the past very soon. Just an opinion.
    It's a different discussion but I think it's pretty naive to think violent video games, movies, etc. don't have any affect on certain people that watch them. As far as kids go, ultimately the blame falls on the parents but if you've got a 7 year old playing Manhunt or GTA or whatever for 5 hours a day, you can't say that doesn't have some impact on the kids personality and how he sees violence.

  7. #132
    The D.R.A. Drachen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    11,214
    I really enjoy shooting semi-automatic assault rifles. No other tangible reason, really.

    a) I can afford them, b) theyre legal to own and c) theyre a uva lot of fun kit up.

    Its a hobby, nothing more. Dystopian future means nothing to me, although I will say out loud that it troubles me that in a country where your right to privacy is being bombarded by your government and large corporate data miners, the only people with the assault rifles would be law enforcement and the military. If civil unrest were to happen (extremely unlikely), the citizen NOT having assault rifles would be akin to the Colonists not owning muskets. The difference in sheer firepower with one side having assault rifles and the other having hunting rifles and handguns would be...one sided to say the least.

    But ultimately, thats a philosophical viewpoint, not one rooted in current reality. Flippantly, I own property waaaaaay up north where I could shoot short range artillery if I were certified and trained to do so (yes, you can get certified to own and operate privately). Assault rifles are just a whooooole lot of fun to operate.
    Yeah some places are so overpopulated that you shooting them for the count. I've never hunted the boar to eat. Just to help friends get them off their land. But about the weapon. It's just a great rifle. Not much kick at all. Pretty much the same as a .22.

    Buying an auto legally and carrying it legally would set you back atleast $1500.

    Well, I know nothing about guns, and I don't even know what this is, but I ran across it and thought you guys might want to take a look at it.

    AR15 stripped lower receiver = $80
    http://slickdeals.net/f/5710364-GUNS...nderson-80-S-H

  8. #133
    Veteran cantthinkofanything's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    14,938
    Buying an auto legally and carrying it legally would set you back atleast $1500.
    LMAO...yeah "at least" that.

  9. #134
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    I really enjoy shooting semi-automatic assault rifles. No other tangible reason, really.

    a) I can afford them, b) theyre legal to own and c) theyre a uva lot of fun kit up.

    Its a hobby, nothing more. Dystopian future means nothing to me, although I will say out loud that it troubles me that in a country where your right to privacy is being bombarded by your government and large corporate data miners, the only people with the assault rifles would be law enforcement and the military. If civil unrest were to happen (extremely unlikely), the citizen NOT having assault rifles would be akin to the Colonists not owning muskets. The difference in sheer firepower with one side having assault rifles and the other having hunting rifles and handguns would be...one sided to say the least.

    But ultimately, thats a philosophical viewpoint, not one rooted in current reality. Flippantly, I own property waaaaaay up north where I could shoot short range artillery if I were certified and trained to do so (yes, you can get certified to own and operate privately). Assault rifles are just a whooooole lot of fun to operate.
    I'd venture to say the fact one side will have tanks, fighter jets, drones, and the best trained and organized military in the world has more to do with the one-sided nature of the battle than any citizen's lack of a semi-automatic assault rifle.

  10. #135
    Veteran cantthinkofanything's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    14,938
    Has something else changed or is this just piss poor reporting? Everything I've read said that the AR-15 was in the car and not used to kill the people in the school.

    Magazines that fed bullets into the primary firearm used to kill 26 children and adults at a Connecticut school would have been banned under state legislation that the National Rifle Association and gunmakers successfully fought.

    The shooter at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Adam Lanza, 20, used a Bushmaster AR-15 rifle with magazines containing 30 rounds as his main weapon, said Connecticut State Police Lieutenant Paul Vance at a news conference yesterday.





    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-1...-pressure.html

  11. #136
    Boring = 4 Rings SA210's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Post Count
    14,286
    I think a Razzie would be better..



  12. #137
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    Has something else changed or is this just piss poor reporting? Everything I've read said that the AR-15 was in the car and not used to kill the people in the school.


    The pre-existing narrative finally asserts itself. Not surprising, really.

    Btw, you are correct. The Bushmaster was found in his vehicle. It was not used.

  13. #138
    The D.R.A. Drachen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    11,214
    I'd venture to say the fact one side will have tanks, fighter jets, drones, and the best trained and organized military in the world has more to do with the one-sided nature of the battle than any citizen's lack of a semi-automatic assault rifle.
    This

  14. #139
    The D.R.A. Drachen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    11,214
    The pre-existing narrative finally asserts itself. Not surprising, really.

    Btw, you are correct. The Bushmaster was found in his vehicle. It was not used.

    I had read that there were 4 weapons, the rifle and two handguns on him and another in the car (which I had never seen identified).

    Edit, it seems that the bushmaster .223 was the only weapon used to kill according to the medical examiner.

    http://www.theatlantic.com/national/...bullet/266315/

  15. #140
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    Afghanistan says "Oh Hai guns and stuffs!"

  16. #141
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    I had read that there were 4 weapons, the rifle and two handguns on him and another in the car (which I had never seen identified).
    http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/14/us/con...ing/index.html

    Three weapons were recovered from the school: a semi-automatic .223 Bushmaster found in a car in the school parking lot, and a Glock and a Sig Sauer found with Lanza's body, a law enforcement official familiar with the investigation said. The weapons were legally purchased by Lanza's mother, the official said.

  17. #142
    Live by what you Speak. DarkReign's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    10,571
    I'd venture to say the fact one side will have tanks, fighter jets, drones, and the best trained and organized military in the world has more to do with the one-sided nature of the battle than any citizen's lack of a semi-automatic assault rifle.
    Its a silly train of thought to even entertain, really, but we went there...

    Flashpoint: Civil Unrest. Open revolt in multiple American regions.

    The chances of the military using tanks and aircraft against their own citizens is iffy at best. Unless it was open war (ie Civil War, two sides divided by secession), the government is not going to wholesale slaughter their own people.

    Assuming youre both right and the government did use the full brunt of their military against their own citizens, then nothing would matter anymore anyway. You would no longer call yourself American or care who lived and died at that point. You would be no better than the Russian peasants living under the Tzars or Stalin. The war was lost before it even started.

  18. #143
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    mebbe not.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/n...,3808586.story

    NEWTOWN, Conn. – School shooter Adam Lanza carried hundreds of bullets when he shot his way into Sandy Hook Elementary School and used an assault rifle to do most of the killing, authorities confirmed Sunday.

    Lanza, 20, fired a Bushmaster .223 semiautomatic rifle to kill many of the 20 children and six adults at the school Friday, Connecticut State Police Lt. J. Paul Vance said. He used a Glock 10-millimeter handgun to shoot himself in the head. He also carried at Sig Sauer pistol. A shotgun, the type of which was not identified, was found in the trunk of Lanza’s car outside the school.

    “The Bushmaster was used in the school, in its entirety, and [a] handgun was used to take his own life,” Vance said.

  19. #144
    Live by what you Speak. DarkReign's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    10,571
    Afghanistan says "Oh Hai guns and stuffs!"
    You assume the government would slaughter its own citizens. I dont think that would ever happen in this country. Never. Certainly not for civil disobedience.

  20. #145
    Live by what you Speak. DarkReign's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    10,571
    Well, I know nothing about guns, and I don't even know what this is, but I ran across it and thought you guys might want to take a look at it.

    AR15 stripped lower receiver = $80
    http://slickdeals.net/f/5710364-GUNS...nderson-80-S-H
    Thats just the lower receiver. Its the only federally controlled portion of an assault rifle. Once you own the lower, you can purchase the rest of the firearm without background checks. L. Receivers are cheap, really, its the rest of the rifle that costs a boatload (namely the barrel and upper receiver).

  21. #146
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    You assume the government would slaughter its own citizens. I dont think that would ever happen in this country. Never. Certainly not for civil disobedience.
    Kent State says o.

  22. #147
    The D.R.A. Drachen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    11,214
    Don't anybody mind TB, he is a bit slow from actively engaging BD.... Everybody pity him.

  23. #148
    Live by what you Speak. DarkReign's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    10,571
    Kent State says o.
    I dont recall tanks and aircraft s ing college students on protest. Thus, my point.

  24. #149
    Smell The Wallet Soul_Patch's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    3,236
    It doesn't really matter what he used to kill those kids. Bushmaster, sig 9mm, whatever...In the eyes of the media and general public he used this:


  25. #150
    The D.R.A. Drachen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    11,214
    Thats just the lower receiver. Its the only federally controlled portion of an assault rifle. Once you own the lower, you can purchase the rest of the firearm without background checks. L. Receivers are cheap, really, its the rest of the rifle that costs a boatload (namely the barrel and upper receiver).
    ok. well yall were talking about buying the guns, and I like it when people offer me deals that are topical (i.e. I was talking about buying one), so there ya go.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •