Reply With Quote
Yes, poverty is killing more babies than Obama dreams (from his father) of killing.
Someone so concerned about poverty should probably sell their PC and move to one of those countries that gets bombed a lot in order to make a difference.
Yes, poverty is killing more babies than Obama dreams (from his father) of killing.
Preferably to the places where terrorists are suspected of hiding out.
Human shield!
Much easier to proclaim internet e-victories! As far as he knows, he already won!
Whoa whoa whoa now. How is Obama a piece of ? Those kids came to him first and requested for Obama to do something about it. Those kids wanted to be there so he wasn't standing behind him, he was standing next to them.
SA210 saves hundreds of babies with every post.
They just didn't want Obama to kill them. That probably bought them a few years.
I don't care if Virgin Mary showed up... When talking about such a hot topic as gun control, you don't want to look like a demagogue by parading children around.
I don't think ElNono is calling Obama a POS because of that. He thinks Obama is a POS for other reasons but mentioned it in that post so SA210 wouldn't respond with a, "Typical Obama apologist!" ad-hominem comeback.
SA210 will call anybody who disagrees with him an Obama apologist, whether or not it even makes sense in the context of the topic at hand. That's basically all he has going for him.
Can someone save me some reading and tell me if we've gotten to the part in the thread where SA210 tells us who he thinks killed the Sandy Hook kids? Thanks in advance!
I do think Barry is a hypocrite for using children to try to push his gun agenda (IMO). I don't care if the children asked to be there, a politician (especially a politician!) knows appearances matter.
But SA210 is exactly the same hypocrite. Hides behind dead children to about politicians and try to prop up his re ed conspiracy theories/whoever he shares political affinity with.
What's even sadder is that when asked point blank about their theories, they never say .Absolute delusion
Sorry to disappoint, but we have not.
I'd ask him but I'm on his ignore list
Sorry to disappoint, but we have not.
I'd ask him but I'm on his ignore listyou made it too?
Bummer. Thanks for letting me know. I'll check back in around page 7.Sorry to disappoint, but we have not.
I'd ask him but I'm on his ignore list
Yes. I called him a bad father and it sent him into a fit of tin-foil hat wearing rage.
Wow, Obama letting kids on stage who experienced a tragedy to promote safer gun laws is the same SA210 using dead children for pointless fear mongering and conspiracy? You are way too cynical.I do think Barry is a hypocrite for using children to try to push his gun agenda (IMO). I don't care if the children asked to be there, a politician (especially a politician!) knows appearances matter.
But SA210 is exactly the same hypocrite. Hides behind dead children to about politicians and try to prop up his re ed conspiracy theories/whoever he shares political affinity with.
What's even sadder is that when asked point blank about their theories, they never say .
Feel free to disagree.
IMO, we need to stop with this notion that politicians do all this stuff toprotect the children
Obama caring about dead white children from Connecticut or Obama caring about dead Middle Eastern children? Which do you think will get him more political gain? Of course, the dead white kids from Connecticut will give him more political gain than if he gives a crap about dead kids in the Middle East. It's harsh but true. Even if Obama is lying, it would help him if he would at least say he feels bad about collateral damage and blowback. At least, speak out about it.
The most ironic part is that Ron Paul built a relevant political movement without having to hide behind memes and pictures of dead kids in lieu of having his own actual opinions, tbh.... in SA210's warped mind, I guess Dr. Paul is a "fake libertarian"
This is all about advancing gubment conspiracies, Barry/lib s being corrupt and peddling the great Ron Paul behind dead childrens photos, memes and youtubes.
That doesn't make sense but yes we will disagree. It wasn't just about the children, it was about everybody. You talk as if Obama uses children every time he brought up gun issues. I'm sure he used gun crime stats as a crutch than children.Feel free to disagree.
IMO, we need to stop with this notion that politicians do all this stuff to
It doesn't matter "how many times", IMO. One time is one time too many.
We disagree.
If it was about everybody, he'd have been pushing this agenda long before Sandy Hook ever happened.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
