Reply With Quote
"Do Your Own Research"
-- WC
Oh funny.... Not.
"Do Your Own Research"
-- WC
Shazbot.
You don't get it. Nobody in the administration made that allegation. I cannot find what doesn't exist. You claim it does, so show me.
I gave you the link. It wasn't until 2009 that head QUIT tying Saddam to 9/11. He REPEATED that saddam-9/11 LIE for years, is the main reason military grunts thought they were going into Iraq to avenge 9/11 AND why such a large %age of Americans believed the same.
head was the sheriff leading the neo-con invade-Iraq-for-oil posse of LIARS.
They, PNAC, all wanted into Iraq in the mid-90s.
They welcomed and exploited 9/11 as a LYING pretext to go in.
I think the dubya's Exec's ignoring the non-stop, loud summer-of-2001 warnings was part of their plan to use ANY ATTACK as a pretext to go into Iraq-for-oil.
Link please.
I told you exactly what did. Again, it's not my fault you don't like the answer. It was such purposeful and obtuse conflation even you could tell what was going on.
Well, maybe not.
So you admit he didn't say Iraq was responsible for 911, right?
Why the stupid word games?
Yeah that would be laughable if it did not cost us $2 trillion dollars today and trillions more in the future...Bush/Cheney scared the bageebers out of everyone with all the 'imminent threat' and 'mushroom cloud' talk...plus they never attempted not to associate Saddam with 9/11...even the implication that Saddam was allowing training camps was wrong...the training camps were actually in Kurd-controlled Iraq, an ally of the war on Saddam...
My God.
You guys are so stupid.
Please, show he what they said to make people believe that Saddam had a direct role in 9/11, before those polls were being taken.
you're the ideologically, biased blinded mother er.
google "bush cheney saddam iraq 9/11"
and drop the "direct" qualifier. all the Repugs/neo-c*nts had to do was ASSOCIATE saddam and 9/11, with the obvious implication, and they did that successfully for the military grunts and the general populace.
But they never 'directly' said it.....and drop the "direct" qualifier. all the Repugs/neo-c*nts had to do was ASSOCIATE saddam and 9/11, with the obvious implication, and they did that successfully for the military grunts and the general populace.
idiot.
You cannot drop the "direct."
It's in the poll!How likely is it that Saddam Hussein (INSERT ITEM) ? Would you say that it is very likely, somewhat likely, not very likely, or not at all likely?
a. was personally involved in the September 11 terrorist attacks
Personally involved seems rather direct to me. Am I wrong?
That's my question for Cheney tbh.
My God man. Cheney's answer was proper.
What is wrong with this? What don't you comprehend?MR. RUSSERT: The Washington Post asked the American people about Saddam Hussein, and this is what they said: 69 percent said he was involved in the September 11 attacks. Are you surprised by that?
VICE PRES. CHENEY: No. I think it’s not surprising that people make that connection.
MR. RUSSERT: But is there a connection?
VICE PRES. CHENEY: We don’t know. You and I talked about this two years ago.
He didn't say "No. there is no connection."
Pretty simple if one devotes the right amount of brain power to mere comprehension.
Do you want him to lie and say there is no connection if they don't know?
My God... What a ing moron you are. Do you really think he knew factually one way or another?
I want him to tell the truth and say there is no connection.
Yes.My God... What a ing moron you are. Do you really think he knew factually one way or another?
If you have no evidence of a connection, you have no evidence of a connection.
1 = 1
What kind of a ing moron doesn't understand that?
LOL...
Your stupidity never ceases to amaze me Fuzzy.
Your stupidity never amazed me. Your stupidity is pretty mundane and predictable.
Cheney Marks Tenth Anniversary of Pretending There Was Reason to Invade Iraq
In a sombre ceremony attended by former members of the Bush administration, the former Vice-President Cheney marked the tenth anniversary of making up a reason to invade Iraq.
The ceremony, held on the grounds of the Halliburton Company headquarters, brought together the former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, the former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, the former Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, and other key members of the lying effort.
Calling the assembled officials “profiles in fabrication,” Mr. Cheney praised them for their decade of dedication to a totally fic ious rationale.
“Making up a reason to invade a country is the easy part,” Mr. Cheney told them. “Sticking to a pretend story for ten years—that is the stuff of valor.”
Mr. Cheney added that their “steadfast charade had raised the bar for all future administrations.”
“When it is time to invade Iran or Venezuela, will the President have the will to make up an entirely fake reason to do it?” he asked. “That remains to be seen.”
The ceremony ended on an emotional note, as Mr. Cheney placed a wreath on the Tomb of the Unknown W.M.D.
Former President George W. Bush, who was said to be otherwise engaged, was represented at the event by a nude self-portrait.
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blog...#ixzz2O0INuibn
LOL...
There was reason. Why can't you liberals accept it.
THE REASON was oil.
EVERYTHING ELSE is lies.
Right.
That really helped.
Believe as you wish. You are simply wrong. I know I will never change your mind, so I will just laugh at you.
cuz saddamn attacked us?
No Cosmored, that was never a reason. Why made people believe that? CBS or CNN? The Bush administration never used that as a reason. If you believe so, please supply a link before 2003.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
