No. I have a semi-fundie father, so I had my fill of Christianity really early. I don't really have many Christian friends, other than the one I mentioned upthread that's trying to belief his way to heterosexuality. I am a theist, though, and I believe therefore in religious freedom. I'm a deist, so I am a functional atheist when it comes to most extensions of religion. I don't believe in things like prayer or good and evil. I still celebrate Christmas with my family and like to hear the songs, but I don't into a fervor over them. They're just songs expressing culture, and I find that interesting.
I don't think so. That's why it's such a murky issue. Civil Unions seem to get shot down by gay people, not by religious folks. They claim it's about using the word. Who knows for sure. Different people take different stances. Some are bigots, others just believe in the sanc y of marriage, whatever that means. That's why there needs to be a discussion so everyone can see where the issues are.Opposing gay marriage means you oppose gay couples being able to file their tax return jointly which means you support gay couples paying up to 60% more in taxes than straight couples. These are simple facts.
Every civil rights case that ends with a court ruling or enforcement law and not a cons utional amendment is one enforces already existent rights. Do you not understand the Civil Rights Movement at all. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 didn't give black people rights, they just added enforcement to the rights already granted by the amendments. Black people HAD the right to vote after the 15th Amendment was passed. Jim Crow just denied it to them.when has a civil rights struggle ever been about "enforcing already present civil rights", it's always been about when someone is getting civil rights. 20 years from now, we'll be referring to this time as the civil rights movement for gay people and I'll be able to laugh at all the dumb s who had an epiphany sometime during this period and flip flopped on the issue.
People are calling this a civil rights movement now, and it's inappropriate. There was a gay civil rights movement already. This is something else. I support it, because I don't think anyone has the authority to tell anyone else who they can marry, so long as they're consenting adults. But that's not because anyone has a civil right to it.

Reply With Quote
when has a civil rights struggle ever been about "enforcing already present civil rights", it's always been about when someone is getting civil rights. 20 years from now, we'll be referring to this time as the civil rights movement for gay people and I'll be able to laugh at all the dumb s who had an epiphany sometime during this period and flip flopped on the issue.
