_JaG is a huge Parker knobslobber. I dont even think Brazil gets this upset about Parker threads tbh.
The funny thing is he talks about me or mid bumping our own threads but he was bumping my thread to 'laugh' at me every other game, which is the frequency at which a supposed MVP candidate decided to show up this series. There is plenty of evidence to support the fact that Parker disappears in the playoffs btw...his shot simply is too inconsistent for him to consistently play at an elite level. Its not that ing hard to pack the paint on him and when that happens his shot is either hit or miss. The fact that he rarely has an impact in other areas when hes off makes me dislike him that much more.
Thats exactly what I said, this series was probably the worst stretch of defense Ive ever seen Parker play. Didnt matter if he was guarding Curry, Jack, Thompson, or Barnes all of them were abusing him tbh. Ask Parker nuthuggers like _JaG though. and tell you it was done to tire Parker out on the other end and that it showed how much attention needed to be put on him. Or something along the lines of 'its not his fault he cant guard players that are taller than him'.
Fkla speaking with his troll
Mid wrong about parker
at least I'm pleased he doesn't have to find a new team, he is one of the most valuable spurs fan especially for his capacity to on lakers fans on the clutch.
Parker played well half this series and like absolute the other half. Hes the only 'MVP candidate' Ive ever seen that can prove his haters wrong by playing well half the time tbh. BTW this is my first post in this thread, I wanted to believe in Frenchie this season but it looks like hes resorted to his inconsistent bull in the playoffs per par:
boiled down dummie, Parker is the leader of the Spurs and he carried his team to a WCF, that's mission accomplished for the Spurs and for him. He never had so many responsibilities in O and he delivered. Your Parker is soft card is ridiculous.
There is no disappearing in POs: he is doing what he is supposed to do so far, 22 ppg 6 assists 2 t/o wich is in line with his RS, he is banged up but doesn't complain and puts tons of energy every night, he spent GS serie to defend young taller guys and he stayed with his guys while carrying the load in O. He has been decisive on the pivotal games of the serie and showed guts. All that for 12 MUSD paycheck a year. that's a pretty good return for the Spurs compared to the rest of the league.
didn't mid call Harden the best shooting guard in the league and Curry's game against the Knicks the greatest offensive performance of the decade? also pretty much had the lakers beating us in the series now dubbed as the sweep (sorry ClipperNation, our sweep was better). emotional roller coaster indeed. parker had several huge 4th quarters this season, and Mid put this up after 1 or 2 poor showings"jag hates me"
Quit being an emo GNSF. I don't hate you, I usually just try to ignore you now. You became a laker-obsessed GNSF who doesn't know what to post about now that Culburn is gone. You pulled up a thread I started in 2009 to prove Tony is my favorite player?
Your takes are and you ride an emotional roller-coaster going back and forth with your opinions. You're the quintessential GNSF.
Too much hyperbole and drama on these ing forums sonetimes..from what I've read both mp and _Jag are funny, intelligent posters so its kind of lame to see them each trying to act like other is a worthless bag for whatever reason..same thing with that Jason Collins thread, DPG, _Jag, and Blake who are all funny intelligent literate posters sat around calling each other re s because they disagreed on some issue and wanted to make each other look bad..
Has he or has he not played well only half the time these playoffs? I dont care what his averages are. They were fine in 2011 as well but that doesnt mean Conley didnt make him his little hoe. Timmy has carried the team this far, not Tony...hes been the only consistent performer this postseason and so far the best player on the team for this playoff run. Im sorry but playing well every other game doesnt get it done, its not good enough to be an MVP candidate or a leader of a WCF team.
Timmy is obviously key on what the Spurs are doing even if against GS Timmy has struggled on O and on D and saying he has the only consistent performer is foolish. Like it or not, this is Parker team.
MVP candidate is for RS, in RS before his injury there is no question about the fact he was in the conversation to be in the top 5, he finished 6th IIRC and probably would have finished a bit higher without his injury and Spurs loosing the second seed. So yeah his RS was good enough to be a top 3 to 5 MVP candidate. During these POs nobody is so far saying he is dominant or something.
Also like it or not, he is the leader of a WCF team, there is a reason why teams concentrate their O and D on him, if you take Parker out of the equation, you increase a lot your chance to defeat the Spurs. He was also arguably the leader in 2012 POs too.
Now before you go ap again. Yes west is weak and we are lucky to go against a depleted laker team, GS is nice and all they fought well but they are a limited PO team. Real test will be Grizz. Yes he has been a bit irregular in his performance but at least he has been key / clutch and contributed on each and every game and played his ass off even if he is not 100%.
Considering the cir stances he has done what was expected no more no less.
Saying that, Spurs won't get a ring like that and I fear they won't pass Memphis (btw you pick the spurs to win, I guess you are confident than I am on his capacities). That's not a hit to Parker, he is just not a franchise type of player capable to bring his team to ring and guess what ? he is not receiving the kind of salary reserved for this kind of player. Now Parker 12 M is still better than the majority of the guys that have bigger contract.
bah
We'll need everybody if we want to win the le
The great thing about game 6 vs GSW is that we won despite the big 3 not being dominant
Championship teams need role players to step up for them in the playoffs
How the is it foolish? Who else has performed well consistently in the playoffs? Certainly not Parker or Manu. And this has been Timmys team in the playoffs, he has been the best player and led us this far in the playoffs. For the RS you can say it was Parker.
Im aware its a RS award that wasnt the point. The point is when was the last time a top MVP candidate proved his haters wrong by performing well only 50% in the playoffs? Can you imagine if Paul, Rose, or some other PG did that...his RS MVP candidacy would be considered a farce.MVP candidate is for RS, in RS before his injury there is no question about the fact he was in the conversation to be in the top 5, he finished 6th IIRC and probably would have finished a bit higher without his injury and Spurs loosing the second seed. So yeah his RS was good enough to be a top 3 to 5 MVP candidate. During these POs nobody is so far saying he is dominant or something.
If you take a starter out of the equation you increase the chances of defeating a team? Groundbreaking analysis there, Brazil. Of course Id rather have Parker over Joseph or Neal at PG...but that doesnt mean hes been the best player on the team in the playoffs. Or that hes the leader. Timmy is still the one turning in solid performances on a consistent basis.Also like it or not, he is the leader of a WCF team, there is a reason why teams concentrate their O and D on him, if you take Parker out of the equation, you increase a lot your chance to defeat the Spurs. He was also arguably the leader in 2012 POs too.
You expected him to play well in the playoffs about 50% of the time and play some of the worst defense of his career? Im a 'Parker hater' and even I expected more out of him tbh. I expected him to crumble up eventually against physical compe ion but not against the ing Warriors tbh.Now before you go ap again. Yes west is weak and we are lucky to go against a depleted laker team, GS is nice and all they fought well but they are a limited PO team. Real test will be Grizz. Yes he has been a bit irregular in his performance but at least he has been key / clutch and contributed on each and every game and played his ass off even if he is not 100%.
Considering the cir stances he has done what was expected no more no less.
So he is not a franchise type player capable of bringing his team to a ring but when he gets a bunch of MVP love and attention you have no problem praising him? So in other words when hes playing well you suck him off and when he falls flat on his face you just give him a pass because its not his fault hes not good enough.Saying that, Spurs won't get a ring like that and I fear they won't pass Memphis (btw you pick the spurs to win, I guess you are confident than I am on his capacities). That's not a hit to Parker, he is just not a franchise type of player capable to bring his team to ring and guess what ? he is not receiving the kind of salary reserved for this kind of player. Now Parker 12 M is still better than the majority of the guys that have bigger contract.
Yeah right Tim didn't struggle at times during this serie against gsHow the is it foolish? Who else has performed well consistently in the playoffs? Certainly not Parker or Manu. And this has been Timmys team in the playoffs, he has been the best player and led us this far in the playoffs. For the RS you can say it was Parker.
Im aware its a RS award that wasnt the point. The point is when was the last time a top MVP candidate proved his haters wrong by performing well only 50% in the playoffs? Can you imagine if Paul, Rose, or some other PG did that...his RS MVP candidacy would be considered a farce.
If you take a starter out of the equation you increase the chances of defeating a team? Groundbreaking analysis there, Brazil. Of course Id rather have Parker over Joseph or Neal at PG...but that doesnt mean hes been the best player on the team in the playoffs. Or that hes the leader. Timmy is still the one turning in solid performances on a consistent basis.
You expected him to play well in the playoffs about 50% of the time and play some of the worst defense of his career? Im a 'Parker hater' and even I expected more out of him tbh. I expected him to crumble up eventually against physical compe ion but not against the ing Warriors tbh.
So he is not a franchise type player capable of bringing his team to a ring but when he gets a bunch of MVP love and attention you have no problem praising him? So in other words when hes playing well you suck him off and when he falls flat on his face you just give him a pass because its not his fault hes not good enough.
http://www.sbnation.com/2013/5/17/43...s-nba-playoffs
u just want to find any failed argument to back up your hate. So now Tim in this po is still the best spurs weapon ahead of Parker.
tim plays amazing he is of course one of the main reason of spurs going in wcf but he hasn't been consistently good the whole games during these pos that's foolish to say
He was 7-13 for 19 pts and had 6 rebs and 3 blocks in 32 mins that game. Are you really going to try to spin that and try to say that he sat out the 4th because he was playing terrible?
Either way though, Ill give you that game even though thats BS and Ill simply ask you this...who has been the Spurs most consistent player this postseason ?
lol ur fake ass leader disappearing while duncan was keeping the team in t he game in the first half only to disappear, without his effort ur fake ass leader doesnt have the opportunity in the 4th quarter trying to steal the lime light winning the game aka like that rapist kome
True. Also, weird seeing a non-sarcastic post comin from you
"Purveyor of snark"..perhaps a good custom user le maybe..
Props to Tony
The paint should open up for him next game since Memphis will probably commit extra effort to guarding the 3 point line after today's shooting performance.
Parker played very well. Both him and Bonner were stepping up when it mattered most. Hopefully both can build on this.
The pattern continues. One game the fanboys bump these threads and the next theyre nowhere to be seen. Like I said Tony is the first all-nba, MVP candidate Ive seen that proves his doubters wrong by playing well 50% of the time.Heres to hoping Tony becomes more consistent though, I want him to make me eat crow tbh.
clutch
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
