Reply With Quote
at SA210 pretending like he didn't come to the conclusion that the Boston Bombings were set up by the government, .
Pussy boy, when did I ever say they weren't? lol Moron
Hundreds of eyewitnesses say the south tower was hit by a passenger airplane. There was passenger airplane debris found as late as a couple of weeks ago. Therefore this video that claims the south tower was beaned by a giant ball of oil is debunked.
The WTC towers had express elevators that went from the ground floor to the 78th floor sky lobby and the top floor. Therefore this video that claims an explosion could not travel 80 floors down to the ground lobby is debunked.
All the information needed to debunk these rather stupid videos can be found using the links in the OP, which again is the entire point.
Were any of you truly interested in the truth, you would have spent quite a bit of time taking in a lot of that information that is easily available to you.
Not one of you have -- not mouse, not dan, not SA210. You are not interested in the truth at all.
Last edited by ChumpDumper; 06-06-2013 at 04:29 AM.
Pussy boy, when did I ever say they weren't? lol Moron
Seems like the whole idea is to be as lazy as possible about it. I haven't seen any of them bother defending their stupid theories in years. I guess even they know how dumb they are at some level.
Good job erasing the rest of my sentence, thereby completely removing the context of it, dumbass.
lol pussy boy
Maybe if you call me a pussy boy again, everybody who read the last few posts will forget your complete reading comprehension failure and deceitful tactics.
I will look at this post tonight and examine it thoroughly and give you a reply by Friday if not sooner.
Donning Kruger
That right there says all one needs to know.
It doesn't take much to figure out which poster is in which quartile here. I would guess SA210 thinks he is above average.
/thread
A Critical Analysis of the Collapse of WTC Towers 1,2&7 From a Conventional Explosives and Demolitions Industry ViewpointBrent Blanchard
Says all you need to know about the "controlled demolition" theory.
Please rephrase your response in the form of a meme' or youtube. Preferably, both.
Thx.
^lol
NIST
Release the data...If NIST is so sure that they finally got WTC7 right, then why not release the data they used to make their assumptions in their catastrophic collapse model...instead NIST ask you to take a leap of faith....as a mathematician, I don't do that except in rare cases...although it does not surprise me that Chumpy, Blake and JohnSmith...all probably the same poster...do...
One "expert"
http://topdo entaryfilms.com/911-e...rts-speak-out/
Several experts with Ph.D’s – including National Medal of Science awardee Lynn Margulis.
Bam!
This is their most highly budgeted demonstration of their scientific method to date:One "expert"
http://topdo entaryfilms.com/911-e...rts-speak-out/
Several experts with Ph.D’s – including National Medal of Science awardee Lynn Margulis.
Bam!
I think he is actually saying "Bam!" in this still frame.
And dan, I'm curious: what did Lynn Margulis get her PhD in?
And who said the words contained in this quote? "Our claim is that there’s no evidence that HIV is an infectious virus, or even an en y at all."
Thanks in advance for answering these questions quickly and thoroughly.
typical Chumpy...throwing red herrings here...red herrings there...meanwhile, no data...I said it over 12 years ago....the key to 9/11 rests with the collapse of WTC7...Chumpy and his forum aliases are scared -less of a new investigation because they know it will prove the 9/11 Commission report a complete fabrication...Ive already proven it time and time again with all the sad coincidinks which occurred that day...the cell phone calls on planes....the mysterious blips on the radar...the missing NORAD...the impossible maneuvers made by 'amateur' pilots who weeks before couldn't even fly single engine plans in most cases...three steel frame building collapsing from fire, never happened before.....another plane making an incredible move to strike the Pentagon...another completely collapsing...burying itself...into the ground..something which I have proven has never happened even to planes which crashed at higher speeds and steeper impacts...the sad part is people buy this crap....Chumpy buys this crap and his best reasoning for buying it is because 'it's all that's out there' .... that ...
It's not a red herring, dan -- and it certainly wasn't an attempt the make you meltdown like that.
"Truthers" like you just can't seem to answer simple questions truthfully.
I'll ask again. You brought up the subject by name and of your own volition, so let's flesh this one out before moving on, shall we?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynn_MargulisLynn Margulis attended the University of Chicago, earned a master's degree from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1960, and received her Ph.D. in 1963 from UC Berkeley. In 1966, as a young faculty member at Boston University, she wrote a theoretical paper en led The Origin of Mitosing Eukaryotic Cells.
Where did you get your PHD from again Chumpy?
You didn't quite answer the first question, and didn't even try to answer the second.
I'll ask again. I think we're making real progress here.
Quit lowering yourself to WC standards and read the discovery article yourself...nd who said the words contained in this quote? "Our claim is that there’s no evidence that HIV is an infectious virus, or even an en y at all."
http://discover.coverleaf.com/discov...104?pg=68#pg72
Getting closer, dan -- but you just can bring yourself to giving a simple answer to a simple question.
Once more.
Here's how it's done, dan.
Take notes. This is a big problem area for you.
See? Now everyone can make his or her own judgment regarding the wisdom of your dropping her particular name in a thread led Real 9-11 Research.
There's no reason to hide such information if one is truly interested in the truth.
Yeah, everyone can see that she is a respected author of several peer reviewed articles with a PHD in genetics and your an asshat....thanks for the informed decision...See? Now everyone can make his or her own judgment regarding the wisdom of your dropping her particular name in a thread led Real 9-11 Research.
There's no reason to get so angry.
She's your 9/11 genetics expert. Tell us how you feel her research in genetics and HIV denial contribute to your personal search for the truth.
One expert, yes, in conjunction with several others at a company that does this for a living.One "expert"
http://topdo entaryfilms.com/911-e...rts-speak-out/
Several experts with Ph.D’s – including National Medal of Science awardee Lynn Margulis.
Bam!
Sooooo, you copied and pasted the quote from your link. Lazy.This report is authored by Brent Blanchard, Senior Editor for Implosionworld.com and Director of Field Operations at Protec Do entation Services, Inc. (www.protecservices.com), Rancocas, New Jersey. Additional contributions and research assistance was provided by Protec employees Earl Gardner, Gary McGeever, Michael Golden and John Golden.
Protec is one of the world’s most knowledgeable independent authorities on explosive demolition, having performed engineering studies, structure analysis, vibration/air overpressure monitoring and photographic services on well over 1,000 structure blasting events in more than 30 countries. These include the current world record-holders for largest, tallest and most buildings demolished with explosives. Protec regularly do ents the work of more than 20 explosives contractors who perform structure blasting as a primary source of revenue (including extensive experience with every American company) as well as dozens more who blast structures in a part-time capacity.
Beyond the above, Protec possesses several additional types of data and experience that place the firm in a unique position to analyze and comment on this event:
Protec technicians were operating portable field seismographs at several construction sites in Manhattan on 9/11. These seismographs recorded the events at Ground Zero, including the collapse of all three structures. These measurements, combined with seismic and airblast data recorded by other independent en ies, provide an unfiltered, purely scientific view of each event.
In the weeks following 9/11, several Protec building inspectors and staff photographers, including this author, were contracted by demolition teams to do ent the deconstruction and debris removal processes at Ground Zero. These processes included the mechanical pull-down of the remains of the U.S. Customs Building (WTC 6) and various other activities occurring simultaneously throughout the site. Our teams took thousands of photographs and personally examined untold amounts of debris, including countless structural elements from WTC 1 and 2. While these photographs and video recordings were not originally intended to specifically prove or disprove evidence of explosive demolition, they do provide substantial visual evidence that relates directly to this analysis and place us in a position to speak first-hand of conditions on site rather than relying on outside testimony or hearsay.
Protec has been given access to thousands of personal photographs taken by laborers and site foremen employed by the demolition companies responsible for deconstructing the Ground Zero site. The companies include Tully Construction, D.H. Griffin Wrecking, Mazzocchi Wrecking, Yannuzzi Demolition, Gateway Demolition and Manafort Brothers. (Any other demolition company claiming to have worked on the Ground Zero site either worked under the supervision of one of these firms or is misrepresenting their participation.) In addition, Protec do ented the only public discussion of the 9/11 clean-up attended by all of the demolition teams (National Demolition Association Convention, Orlando, Florida, 4/22/03). While the original intent of Protec’s two-hour video was to archive the unprecedented challenges faced by these teams, various questions and commentary from the speakers are relevant to this analysis.
Because building implosions are often promoted as live news events, Protec’s offices are equipped to record multiple television broadcasts at all times. Our company’s archived recordings of original news broadcasts from the morning of 9/11 begin well prior to the collapse of the first tower and continue uninterrupted beyond the collapse of WTC 7. These original unedited recordings have allowed us to compare and scrutinize the collapse of all three structures free from any possibility of image tampering or modification. In addition, we have examined dozens of freelance and amateur video recordings incorporated into various do entary programs chronicling 9/11 and studied countless ground-based and aerial images captured by private, press and government-contracted photographers.
I would assume that the gal there did not really opine on the controlled demolition theory, and if she did, her PhD means less than this guys real world, first hand experience.
What exactly did she say that supports it?
'cause I am not watching a two-hour video to find out.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 06-10-2013 at 10:26 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
