Kobe
Pau
Nash
Mitch
As far as the thread le, you have to go with the two-time league MVP, tbh...
No doubt. Defense and rebounding won that series, and Kobe did exactly that.Same game: 15 rebounds + great defense = #16.
The 2013 Finals was won by making shots, and the ing Spurs blinked first by missing wide open layups. Christ
I heard of a minute man, but a 28 second man? No wonder Amy wasn't satisfied despite Tammy's millions
Kobe got 3 rangs without Pau. How many do you have without Pip?
Amy signed a prenupPERIODI heard of a minute man, but a 28 second man? No wonder Amy wasn't satisfied despite Tammy's millions
Yeah, but she's a caucazoid, so they will $$$$$ettlePERIOD. I bet for more than $4MAmy signed a prenupPERIOD
#PAIN&SUFFERING
not a dimePERIODYeah, but she's a caucazoid, so they will $$$$$ettlePERIOD. I bet for more than $4M
#PAIN&SUFFERING
That's cold son. But we're better off tbh.
Wanna bet The Farm! on det ?not a dimePERIOD
2000 NBA FinalsKobe got 3 rangs without Pau. How many do you have without Pip?
Shaq- 38 PPG, 17 RPG, 2.5 APG, 2.7 BPG, 61% FG 96/157----6 games
Kobe-16 PPG, 5 RPG, 4 APG, 1.4 BPG, 36% FG%, 33/90----5 games
MVP= Shaq. Shaq performs MUCH better than Bryant who shoots a pathetic 36 percent. Also Shaq was doubled covered while Kobe was left with less coverage but even then Shaq did much better.
2001 NBA Finals
Shaq- 33 PPG, 16 RPG, 5 APG, 3.5 BPG, 63/110 57% FG-----5 games
Kobe- 24 PPG, 8 RPG, 6 APG, 1.4 BPG, 44/106 41% FG------5 games
MVP= Shaq. Shaq performs MUCH better than Bryant who shoots 41%.. Also Shaq was doubled covered while Kobe was left with less coverage but even then Shaq did much better.
2002 NBA Finals
Shaq- 37 PPG, 12.25 RPG, 4 APG, 2.75 BPG, 50/84 60% FG----4 games
Kobe-26 PPG, 5.75 RPG, 5 APG, .75 BPG, 36/70 51% FG-------4 games
MVP= Shaq again. Same old story- Shaq gets doubled coverage yet he still out performs Kobe big time.
Total average stats for 3 championships (15 games)=
Shaq=36 PPG, 15.4 RPG, 3.7 APG, 3 BPG, 209/351 60% FG, Double coverage
Kobe=20 PPG, 6 RPG, 4.6 APG, 1 BPG, 113/266 42% FG, Single coverage
cottie Pippen's NBA Finals Stats
1991 - 20.8 ppg, 9.4 rpg, 6.6 apg, 2.4 spg, 45.3 FG%
1992 - 20.8 ppg, 8.3 rpg, 7.7 apg, 1.5 spg, 48.4 FG%
1993 - 20.8 ppg, 9.2 rpg, 7.7 apg, 2.0 spg, 43 FG%
1996 - 15.7 ppg, 8.2 rpg, 5.3 apg, 2.3 spg, 34 FG%
1997 - 20.0 ppg, 8.3 rpg, 3.3 apg, 1.7 spg, 42.1 FG%
1998 - 15.7 ppg, 6.8 rpg, 4.8 apg, 1.7 spg 41 FG%
1990-91 Lakers 5 44.0 .558 .500 .848 1.6 5.0 6.6 11.4 2.8 1.40 3.6 3.6 31.2 1991-92 Trail Blazers 6 42.3 .526 .429 .891 1.0 3.8 4.8 6.5 1.7 0.33 2.0 3.5 35.8 1992-93 Suns 6 45.7 .508 .400 .694 2.5 6.0 8.5 6.3 1.7 0.67 2.7 3.3 41.0 1995-96 Supersonics 6 42.0 .415 .316 .836 1.7 3.7 5.3 4.2 1.7 0.17 3.0 2.8 27.3 1996-97 Jazz 6 42.7 .456 .320 .764 1.5 5.5 7.0 6.0 1.2 0.83 2.2 2.3 32.3 1997-98 Jazz 6 41.7 .427 .308 .814 1.5 2.5 4.0 2.3 1.8 0.67 1.7 2.2 33.5 Finals 5.8 43.0 .481 .368 .806 1.8 4.4 6.0 6.0 1.8 0.66 2.4 2.9 33.6
How long will it take until El realizes that he has no right talking about the sweep when he couldn't capitalize on the le? For 's sake, man
I can bet The Sweep, tbhWanna bet The Farm! on det ?
How long will it take Lakerfan to realize they have no right to talking about *anything* after The Sweep when we ended their season? For 's sake, manHow long will it take until El realizes that he has no right talking about the sweep when he couldn't capitalize on the le? For 's sake, man
How long will it take until El realizes that he has no right talking about the sweep when he couldn't capitalize on the le? For 's sake, man
^ sup, Lefty?
more riding by Lakerfan... have to ride coattails like Cancer because his team was Swept
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
