Reply With Quote
Let's give a shout out to you for being so gracious in your admission that operation Northwoods had nothing to do with the killing of US citizens.
Bull . They sink a ship with sailors on it. Casualties are almost certain.
Let's give a shout out to you for being so gracious in your admission that operation Northwoods had nothing to do with the killing of US citizens.
Lol you trying to make bond for murderous neocon MIC devils.
If you blow up a bomb in public, and bystanders die, is it murder?
If you sink a ship and sailors drown is it murder?
If you stage an attack on a US base, and US troops die, is it murder?
Bull , there is nothing about the ship's being manned. US casualties are explicitly avoided in the other plans when only one or two would be killed.
Why would they want hundreds of deaths? Why would they be necessary here if they were not necessary anywhere else they planned to fake deaths?
Why could they not fake deaths like they planned to in the other plans?
If you sink a ship and no one is on it, do you kill anyone?
If you blow up ammo on a USS base and start fires, and soldiers die, is it murder?
If you blow up planes on a US base and bystanders die, is it murder?
If you send mortar into a US base, and soldiers die, is it murder?
Not in any of the plans.
In fact, when anything is specifically mentioned, it is explicit that no one actually dies.
If you set fires on US ships and sailors die as a result, is it murder?
You can plan any of these things without deaths.
That's the whole point of this do ent.
Good on you for actually reading it after I forced you to.
SA210 couldn't even do that.
A remember the maine incident involving an empty ship? No logical premise supports your lea of logic whatsoever.
The entire do ent supports that logic.
Good on you for bringing awareness to the info, after I let you open the door to a discussion of all that damning information.
Actually, you wanted to force my silence like a fascist. Instead, you ended up proving why SA210 was wrong.Good on you for bringing awareness to the info, after I let you open the door to a discussion of all that damning information.
The do ent supports the idea that these bas s only goal was invading Cuba, and they didn't care what carnage they had to leave to do so. That they didn't announce a body count doesn't alleviate their intent to blow up, set fire, sink ships with sailors aboard, initiate terror campaigns in major American cities, and use mortar rockets to s American facilities, without regard to fatalities. Fatalities are a given. They in fact serve the cause. They were planned for.
Fatalities were not a given and they were explicitly to be avoided. No real deaths were necessary for what they were proposing. If they wanted deaths, they wouldn't have explicitly planned to avoid them.
"Remember the Maine" incidents involve sailors.
Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. Malice aforethought n. 1) the conscious intent to cause death or great bodily harm to another person before a person commits the crime. Such malice is a required element to prove first degree murder. 2) a general evil and depraved state of mind in which the person is unconcerned for the lives of others. Thus, if a person uses a gun to hold up a bank and an innocent bystander is killed in a shoot-out with police, there is malice aforethought.
Thus any death would be a murder. Blood on the hands of murderous government officials.
Nope. The second plan proves you wrong. There is no reason to believe the first one would involve killing sailors. No need.
Thanks for proving the intent to kill or cause great bodily harm wasn't there.
See what happens when you actually read the crap you post?
I appreciate you helping out with Operation Northwoods awareness Chump. Goodnight
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
