Reply With Quote
Why discuss science when you can just name drop instead?
lol "I know Stephen Hawking"
In effect that's what science tells us. It just took billions of years to get there. The idiocy to think that someone as dumb as you happened purely by coincidence proves there is humor in science. It also proves a Creator.Ah cool, the ol' "imagine if a print shop exploded and fell perfectly into a fully functioning set of encyclopedias! That's what evolutionists and atheists want you to believe happened!!!"
Good stuff.
Why discuss science when you can just name drop instead?
lol "I know Stephen Hawking"
Perhaps it doesn't need to, but I find the pure randomness of chance leading to all of this a far harder pill to swallow than a deity. That's just me. Cheerio.
grown men who sit around all day on spurstalk arguing about the dumbest most pointless subjects while neglecting their family duties are disgusting. it might be a little different if these were like intelligent, constructive arguments but it's always just troll baiting and snippy back and forth. your posts read like they were written like a woman dude, you and chump both have that prissy tone in your posts.
who created the creator?
Something so complex as an omnipotent creator couldn't have just suddenly appeared. It proves a creator created the creator!
Have you ever asked any of these things to Hawking? I have. You infer me as ignorant and unenlightened when the opposite is indeed true.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>There is no need to discuss science and I will tell you why. The very things you will use to try and disprove God I will just reverse on you like Judo and say there is one. There is no proof either way. Thus it is faith.
Yes, even SCIENCE requires faith in the unseen and unknown, because even the tiniest photon fired through something to observe it CHANGES what we observe.
Last edited by Skull-1; 09-29-2013 at 05:14 PM.
That is merely your opinion.
Are you aware of that?
It is just as easy and credible for me to say that you have less credibility than Pope Francis, thus by your extension, less than Stalin.
Suffice it to say, it is one opinion against another.
And most probably the real Truth lies somewhere in between.
I will say this again:
Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one. And everyone thinks theirs doesn't stink.
I Am That I Am.
lmao family duties.
Go back to doing important things like attacking Zionists and making fun of Jews.
What came first, the chicken or the egg? The Creator will answer that in the next life or we will all be worm food and thus unaware.
You presume that the existence of God is limited by observable space, time, and the laws of science that we think we know. Man cannot even predict weather with any certainty yet is able to definitively say that this plane of existence is the only one? We have only just barely breached the solar system. I would say that egg needs more cooking...
I will tell you that our existence as we see it is very limited. SCIENCE and all its theoretical nonsense is extremely limiting if God is what I believe Him to be. There are certainly enough sign posts in Scripture to prove for me He exists. YMMV.
Last edited by Skull-1; 09-29-2013 at 05:18 PM.
I don't have to try to disprove God at all.
You're not good at this.
This is a common symptom/example of true blindness - I see this and I just chuckle because I have been there before. I guess the only difference is that I wanted to see truth. I was prepared to have my beliefs/knowledge/conclusions/theories challenged. I was prepared to not run away when truth got too painful.
Most will never arrive - even at this - and I am still blinded - but I might have at least gotten a glimpse. Sadly - you won't even get a glimpse as long as you think you already know and others are inferior.
You would much rather hold on to your precious beliefs/education/knowledge/conclusions - because - after all - this is the only world you know - it is terrifying to think you might be wrong or partly blinded - you would much rather lash out and question my intelligence and label me with garbage judgements -
It is much, much easier to keep your eyes covered.
I understand because it is a condition of most of the planet. You want to change the world? You want to do some good?
How about understanding and seeing that the world is stricken with a serious condition called "blindness" - try to wake people up - but first you have to wake yourself up - and be questioned and ridiculed and judged - by people who "know better"
All the other garbage about politics, social evils, agendas, laws, is a waste of in' time. The real enemy is sleeping programmed blind human beings who will walk/talk/breed children/work/fight/ in their sleep and go to their grave without ever waking up -
That is something that needs attention - not all this petty little political/religious and ideological differences....that is just "moving the furniture around"
In the end who gives a which formula was superior to other formulas? They were still formulas and nothing to do with reality.
You think you see the world and all you quarrel about is formulas and labels....
Chuckle-chuckle - the blind questioning others "sight"
You acting like misusing a term like "begging the question" is semantics = lol
So locking up someone in prison who locked up someone in their home, that's the same thing twice. Got it.
Sticking your finger up someone's ass for sexual reasons is the same as sticking your finger up someone's ass to search for contraband. Got it.
You could have copped out much sooner and saved yourself from the embarrassing name dropping.
Oh but we have thousands of codexes to cross reference and we can distill out much of the error. Not all of it, perhaps, especially the translation bias that comes up with "Marital unfaithfulness" or "sexual immorality" when that's not the word used. But there are enough failsafes in the scriptures for a spiritual man to find the truth. That's why FEW find it. God does it that way on purpose.
Rather than be offended, let me highlight your comment as it only proves what scripture teaches. And Paul said He learned everything directly from Christ through direct revelation. Jesus' physical condition is irrelevant.
Last edited by Skull-1; 09-29-2013 at 05:13 PM.
Mouse/Cosmored argument = invalid
Your opinion. I don't give a f... .
Last edited by Skull-1; 09-29-2013 at 05:09 PM.
Then what's the point? I say He exists. You say He doesn't. I use the foundation of scripture and some common sense (with science thrown in). You rely on a discipline you barely comprehend (and argue against a book you cannot understand). LMFAO. Speaking of not good at this..!!!
You are abjectly and absurdly ignorant so I would be careful with that self-righteous finger of yours. Get back to me when you have a serious question. Goodbye until then.
Last edited by Skull-1; 09-29-2013 at 05:11 PM.
First of all - you are a bigot who married someone who falls under the same label that you are bigoted against - so to speak.
You are pretty in ridiculous to even waste any time on so I won't.
Bigot.
The guy is the worst of trolls. Time to just squelch his ignorance and enjoy the rest of your weekend. Cheers.
Good idea!
LMFAO at the suggestion that abortion has advanced society. You would have looked good in a brown shirt.
(Also, Creationism is stupid. I say that as a follower of Christ. As for gay marriage, the "Christian" hypocrisy on this issue is laughable. Christians let straight people swap spouses like socks and call it <re>marriage under the guises of mercy, grace, and redemption when Christ and Paul called it ADULTERY. Tell those supposed Christians to fix heterosexual marriage before they start going off about what gay people are doing. It was Luther's erroneous contention that the church had to follow what the State allowed regarding marriage and the church went right along with it-- o irreconcilable differences! The only proper role of the government in "marriage" is record keeping. Again, fix the Adultery Within The Church. That is a far bigger crisis than gays wanting to "marry".)
Last edited by Skull-1; 09-29-2013 at 05:34 PM.
Double post.
I am sure you had no real shot at a decent rebuttal anyhow.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
