Is there a Bible/ New Testament expert in the house?

[Skull-1]

Gave you more than enough chances to be civil - you refused - no worries...

oh - I didn't mean to insult the re ed monkeys - not all re ed monkeys are as stupid and ignorant and angry and salty as you -

Glad to see someone finally giving these two heads a taste of their own medicine....

[Blake]

I am aware that he tried really hard. I am still waiting for his youtube video of Constantine screwing this whole thing up. See, he has to have just as much blind faith as I do to believe his position. The difference is that mine is backed up with spiritual truth and consistency, along with prophecy that dates to thousands of years before young Constantine made his appearance.

you can't back something with spiritual truth.

Lol.

[Blake]

Glad to see someone finally giving these two heads a taste of their own medicine....

that taught me

[silverblk mystix]

Glad to see someone finally giving these two heads a taste of their own medicine....

Unfortunately - it is not possible to remain respectful -

I was trying because xmas - was courteous and it looked like he got Blake to "be a gentleman" for a little while - so I tried to just enjoy a respectful conversation - but Blake is a little who can't help himself...so here we are.

[Blake]

The you can't. If His purpose is to make the book a mystery then that is a perfectly fine technique to veil the truth. Red vs. purple is not a show stopper in any way, particularly in light of other scripture.

It's not his purpose to make the book a mystery:

2 Corinthians 4

*2*Rather, we have renounced secret and shameful ways;we do not use deception, nor do we distort the word of God.*On the contrary, by setting forth the truth plainly we commend ourselves to everyone’s conscience*in the sight of God.

You're a hack.

[Blake]

Unfortunately - it is not possible to remain respectful -

I was trying because xmas - was courteous and it looked like he got Blake to "be a gentleman" for a little while - so I tried to just enjoy a respectful conversation - but Blake is a little who can't help himself...so here we are.

Blake made me melt down

[silverblk mystix]

It's not his purpose to make the book a mystery:



You're a hack.

What's the difference?

You use the bible to insult others and cherry pick quotes to serve your purposes...so what is the ing difference - and you are labeling someone a hack?

What does this make you?

An angry and spiteful prick who finds stuff - out of context - and use it as a platform to be a nasty little prick?

The internet....anonymity - makes you grow huge balls.

Pathetic.

[silverblk mystix]

Blake made me melt down

This is all you know...all you'll ever know ....and all you are capable of.

You will be chumpie #2 in a few thousand more posts. Nice!

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Oh come on, now, you know that Paul was just an invention of Constantine. He wasn't special in any way. He obviously put Jesus' Right Hand Man (Peter, who validated Paul, in his writings that you don't believe, btw) under his spell. Basically, we're screwed.

So, why are you appealing to a do ent you are discrediting, bag?

I never said any of this. I am pointing to the inconsistencies in the Bible. When two things contradict then one of the has to be wrong if they are mutually exclusive. Something that is one color cannot be of another. Our understanding of EM radiation explains this very clearly.

Paul hardly saw eye to eye with Peter. Review 2nd Peter and Galatians and try again.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Learn to quote scripture properly. He doesn't say "GOVERNING AUTHORITIES" it is "*HIGHER* AUTHORITIES". Spiritual meaning.

I quoted one translation. We know that you think your interpretation is the only one with merit narcissist. You haven't gone to the shrink yet have you?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

They are consistent enough that the gnats you strain do not matter. My simple explanations go right over your thick head. Don't ask me about more in depth things until you grasp the simple ones. Sh*thead.

There are about 9,166 differences between the Majority Text and the combined errors in Vaticanus and Sinaiticus in the four Gospels alone.

From your source. Over 9,000 discrepancies in the three versions mentioned here for the 4 gospels alone. You can resort to qualitative semantics like "consistent enough" and I will use your source to show a hard number that allows people to make an objective judgment of their own.

You can front why you are only discussing the veneer all you like but you are not discussing anything meaningful by your own admission. It is what it is. I still say you are a coward.

[Blake]

How is it you know so much about the Bible if I may ask? You said you lean the closest to agnostic viewpoints.
And have you studied any other faiths Buddhism, Brahmanism, Hinduism, or Islam? Didn't you mention Zoroastrianism?

12 years of Christian school Bible classes, a couple of years of seminary. Lol even took a Bible as Literature class at Texas Tech for an easy A.

Yes, in depth studies on all major religions of the world. Came a hair away from being an ordained suthrn baptist preacha.

Fuzzy could teach a course, imo.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I haven't quoted the BMT here. I simply state that I find it a more faithful representation of the original. Feel free to post the Youtube video of Constantine defying prophecy and sticking us with a Bible containing the wrong books, please. You have no sense PERIOD, historic or otherwise.

I am talking about the history of the church. I don't need youtube because I can express it on my own. You STILL cannot rebut a word of it. While you may not have quoted it you have cited it multiple times as proof of constancy. It's nice to here that you cite something you deem less than the best though.

[Blake]

What's the difference?

You use the bible to insult others and cherry pick quotes to serve your purposes...so what is the ing difference - and you are labeling someone a hack?

What does this make you?

An angry and spiteful prick who finds stuff - out of context - and use it as a platform to be a nasty little prick?

The internet....anonymity - makes you grow huge balls.

Pathetic.

If it was pure truth, free of contradictions, I wouldn't be able to cherry pick.

damn you're stupid.

[Skull-1]

It's not his purpose to make the book a mystery:



You're a hack.

Yeah, it is. I posted nearly fifty passages to prove it. Glad you ignored them, dipsh*t.

I am right.


You, however, are a troll. And a stupid one at that.

[Skull-1]

I am talking about the history of the church. I don't need youtube because I can express it on my own. You STILL cannot rebut a word of it. While you may not have quoted it you have cited it multiple times as proof of constancy. It's nice to here that you cite something you deem less than the best though.

God veils the truth. What we have is the best there is and that's the way God intended it. The Tower of Babel is a parable that applies quite well to the confusion in Christianity. That's why it is a mystery. This history of the church is quite corrupt, yet God's word prevailed for the few who have spiritual eyes to see. Worked out just as prophecy said it would.

[Skull-1]

From your source. Over 9,000 discrepancies in the three versions mentioned here for the 4 gospels alone. You can resort to qualitative semantics like "consistent enough" and I will use your source to show a hard number that allows people to make an objective judgment of their own.

You can front why you are only discussing the veneer all you like but you are not discussing anything meaningful by your own admission. It is what it is. I still say you are a coward.

Discrepancies meaning transcription errors, etc. that are easily discerned. And even with these errors enough of the truth remains that NOTHING CHANGES to the spiritual.

Give it up moron. You are overmatched.


Coward? You wouldn't say that to my face because they would bury your ignorant ass under your hat.

Yeah, it takes a real coward to argue with an endless stream of bag liars with nothing but contempt for anyone who sees what they can't.

[Skull-1]

I quoted one translation. We know that you think your interpretation is the only one with merit...

That is correct.

I prefer my condition of spiritual awareness to yours of carnal stupidity. Bring it on idiot. Keep it coming. You are a clown and a caricature.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

God veils the truth. What we have is the best there is and that's the way God intended it. The Tower of Babel is a parable that applies quite well to the confusion in Christianity. That's why it is a mystery. This history of the church is quite corrupt, yet God's word prevailed for the few who have spiritual eyes to see. Worked out just as prophecy said it would.

So your so stupid that you believe man all spoke one language and tried to build a tower to heaven?

Oh that's right you just dismiss the obvious absurdities and double down by making up whatever you like. It's not like I haven't heard this bull that is a thinly veiled excuse for the authority of the clergy. Or as in this case, for narcissists fronting as if they can discern the mystery that everyone else cannot.

[Skull-1]

I never said any of this. I am pointing to the inconsistencies in the Bible. When two things contradict then one of the has to be wrong if they are mutually exclusive. Something that is one color cannot be of another. Our understanding of EM radiation explains this very clearly.

Paul hardly saw eye to eye with Peter. Review 2nd Peter and Galatians and try again.

Paul wrote half the Epistles before Peter even wrote one book. How about *YOU* read it and try again, jerkoff. Paul was the one who shook Peter back to sanity. TRY AGAIN you ignoramous.

The Bible is perfectly consistent. We have already explained the color issue in multiple ways. End of day it does NOT matter. People can perceive a COLOR differently, too, just as my two eyes do not see every color the same. The spiritual truth behind it is what matters. I have already nuked the color argument. Pick something else, jerkoff, or just keep ignoring the truth that I have slapped you both with quite thoroughly.

LMAO at some moron straining over hues on a robe. Pathetic that this is the best you've got, you carnal, inspid, beast.

[Skull-1]

What's the difference?

You use the bible to insult others and cherry pick quotes to serve your purposes...so what is the ing difference - and you are labeling someone a hack?

What does this make you?

An angry and spiteful prick who finds stuff - out of context - and use it as a platform to be a nasty little prick?

The internet....anonymity - makes you grow huge balls.

Pathetic.

Indeed. They would wilt before me in person, I guarantee you that. Sissies. Internet toughguys with no brains.

[Skull-1]

So your so stupid that you believe man all spoke one language and tried to build a tower to heaven?

Oh that's right you just dismiss the obvious absurdities and double down by making up whatever you like. It's not like I haven't heard this bull that is a thinly veiled excuse for the authority of the clergy. Or as in this case, for narcissists fronting as if they can discern the mystery that everyone else cannot.

Authority of the clergy? The clergy have no authority. They are liars.


NOTE TO ALL THAT FUZZY CONTINUES TO LIE: AT NO POINT DID I EVER SAY THAT I BELIEVED THE WORLD SPOKE ONE LANGUAGE, ETC. AS D*CKHEAD ASSERTS. In fact, I have repeatedly stated the opposite, that the Tower of Babel is 1) NOT literal. 2) It did NOT happen. 3) It is a PARABLE with a veiled spiritual truth.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Discrepancies meaning transcription errors, etc. that are easily discerned. And even with these errors enough of the truth remains that NOTHING CHANGES to the spiritual.

Give it up moron. You are overmatched.


Coward? You wouldn't say that to my face because they would bury your ignorant ass under your hat.

Yeah, it takes a real coward to argue with an endless stream of bag liars with nothing but contempt for anyone who sees what they can't.

Easily discerned? They don't even have the original copies to make that claim. He is, as I pointed out in my original rebuttal which can be found HERE and that you have since ignored, using confirmation bias and wishful thinking to come to his conclusion. He speaks to things like the motives of teh scribes that he has no way of knowing. He makes the assumption that the copy he likes is the 'right' one and the ones he doesn't like to be 'errors.' It's pretty transparent.

When you address one of my rebuttals directly will be the first time.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Paul wrote half the Epistles before Peter even wrote one book. How about *YOU* read it and try again, jerkoff. Paul was the one who shook Peter back to sanity. TRY AGAIN you ignoramous.

The Bible is perfectly consistent. We have already explained the color issue in multiple ways. End of day it does NOT matter. People can perceive a COLOR differently, too, just as my two eyes do not see every color the same. The spiritual truth behind it is what matters. I have already nuked the color argument. Pick something else, jerkoff, or just keep ignoring the truth that I have slapped you both with quite thoroughly.

LMAO at some moron straining over hues on a robe. Pathetic that this is the best you've got, you carnal, inspid, beast.

Claiming that people can perceive things differently doesn't help your cause. If you need me to explain it I will happy to. Way to undermine your notion of constancy though.

[Skull-1]

Easily discerned? They don't even have the original copies to make that claim. He is, as I pointed out in my original rebuttal which can be found HERE and that you have since ignored, using confirmation bias and wishful thinking to come to his conclusion. He speaks to things like the motives of teh scribes that he has no way of knowing. He makes the assumption that the copy he likes is the 'right' one and the ones he doesn't like to be 'errors.' It's pretty transparent.

When you address one of my rebuttals directly will be the first time.

Yet what we have is amazing and consistent, to the discerning. The lying pen of the scribes in our modern translations can't even hide the truth from those of us who have been given spiritual eyes--for the rest of you, sorry to say, you got hosed.

It is the Word of God, but it is not for the carnal.

Keep trying numbnuts. Keep trying.