2004-2005 he was untouchable and probably one of the best players on the planet. Championship and Gold Medal to prove it.
I think "superstar" means big marketing contracts, media exposition, prestige into the league, in official terms. Manu is a legend, but never received the same praises or was incensed like some less talented american native athletes. I mean Money, fame. But the media, the league, the marketing.
2004-2005 he was untouchable and probably one of the best players on the planet. Championship and Gold Medal to prove it.
It's possible to be a superstar without leading a team to a le
This is a true realistic unbiased perspective. TGY and his e-gang of Manu haters could take a few lessons from you.
Simply put NO....playing w/ Timmy does wonders for ones reputation
Super star at marketing himself to Mexicans in San Antonio YES,though he wouldn't actually come close to associating w/ any of the brown locals sadly enough.
He is too white for them I guess. He said as much.
Exactly! Which explains why many of these guys spend a large portion of their lives talking about him. Just think if they put a small fraction of that time and energy into their families..??
I will enjoy the next two years and hope I can be there when he is inducted into the Hall of Fame.
Too european for the latinos, too White for the american basketball fans. LOL
Too intelligent, too.
Not in the NBA, but yes in international play.
without getting into the semantics of what a superstar is, 48 points iirc
He was a star player, borderline top 10 player, tbh..superstar depends on each individual's definition..
He was a PER superstar for a lot of his career. If you just assumed his production would stay constant and increased his minutes by 5-10 MPG, he'd have put up overall "superstar" numbers.
The problem is that it's not really reasonable to assume that his production would've stayed constant if you increased his minutes.
None of them, probably the term MINI-STAR is closer for those guys
A star yes, a superstar no.
I would say too white for the latinos, here in Argentina most of us have Italian and Spanish heritage so he is a regular dude if you watch tv news here they always report what manu did last night, but every other country like Chile Brazil Paraguay Bolivia are more brownish (not trying to be racist here) but there is another issue too, which is most latinos only care about futbol and futbol and futbol, some soft ones would follow tennis too.
I meant latinos from USA, wathever are their heritage (mostly mexicans and puertoricans, I guess.) Not the South americans.
Finishing in the top 5 in MVP votes qualifies as being a superstar imo.
I know man, I was saying in an international way how manu can appeal the rest of the world, like kobe fans from Vietnam of Katzajistan
Tony isn't a superstar? A perennial MVP candidate? Mmmkay.
You are right. With the exception of Venezuela, Puerto Rico, Argentina, Uruguai and Brazil, But most of the South and latin american countries don't give a about basketball. Ironically, in Brazil, Scolla is more known by the average citizen than Manu because he beasts in every game against Brazil NT.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)