Pats fans: Assuming we beat the Colts, which scenario would you prefer?

[Robz4000]

As for the question, if you end up playing San Diego it means the Chargers are playing great and the Philly bs could be real; I'd be legitimately worried. As for the Donks, it means Peyton isn't choking like usual and you'll be getting them in Denver where only the Chargers have played them close. Either way Pats fan needs to play like an underdog.

[HI-FI]

I admit I hate the pats more than any other team, but I think a lot of it is because of brady. straight up, he might the douchiest player in the NFL. worse is I think he's somewhat overrated. I think he's still HOF and very good, maybe a better thrower than Manning, but I really ing hate brady. I just want to see him go to another team tbh, just to see what would happen. If he elevated a ty team then I would respect him more.

Oddly I have a lot of respect for Belichick and Ernie Adams. I think they're incredible football minds. I think they did cheat more than other teams, but I don't think it's all about cheating for them. It's just BB has a literal Rain Man in Ernie, his autistic since boyhood, so naturally he would want to give him as much information as possible. But that guy is like some sort of a Beautiful Mind and BB is the best coach since my nig Bill Walsh, so basically I'm just really hoping pats keep on doing well once brady retires to prove a point.

Imho, BB should be COTY, that or Sean Payton. pats have some serious injuries, hernandez situation, brady has been slumping more than usual yet they're still no.2, so major respect for BB and also this....

[spurraider21]

Basically this. HIFI's extreme Pats hatred is so over the top that it isn't worth dignifying with a response, or even mocking. The fact that he isn't a Raiders fan also makes it tougher to push his buttons back. Even so, his other non-Pats takes are usually pretty solid, and he wouldn't be re ed enough to judge an entire player's future NFL career based off one game.

talks about pushing buttons yet is still salty over a comment from week 1.

hey while you're here, were you ever able to find where i "melted down" and "went on a rampage" after manning broke the TD record, or are you going to keep dodging that?

[monosylab1k]

talks about pushing buttons yet is still salty over a comment from week 1.

hey while you're here, were you ever able to find where i "melted down" and "went on a rampage" after manning broke the TD record, or are you going to keep dodging that?

lol keep asking maybe one day i'll show you.

[spurraider21]

lol keep asking maybe one day i'll show you.

dodging it is

[dirk4mvp]

lmao patriots

[Ghazi]

hhmm I do recall playoff Manning came back from 18 down in 2006 on his way to ringing...v playoff Brady's choking ass

Patriots

[Ghazi]

2007*. same thing

man the Manning hate is somewhat ridiculous. I've seen articles suggesting Rivers, Wilson, or the Panthers LB or Brady should be MVP this year when it clearly should be Manning.

And his playoff shortcomings are highly over exaggerated. If anything Brady's been the more disappointing playoff performer.

[spurraider21]

[Aztecfan03]

Not really. Those 2 could D up and I'm not sure about SD tbh.

Our D has been healthy lately and playing better. Undefeated since Melvin Ingram came back from IR. We were missing Teo or Butler at ILB a lot early in the season. FA Bust Cox isn't playing anymore so that is addition by subtraction. Im still worried about it, but it can be good.

[Thebesteva]

I can easily see SD winning against Broncos and being the Ravens of this year given the whole momentum and nothing to lose storyline just like every other year with Ravens, Giants, etc. However, I can just as easily see SD losing and everyone of us laughing at them and their fans for all the talking. This is the same SD team that barely...I mean barely beat KC's secondary team to make the playoffs. KC was trying to give SD that game and they still couldn't win it.

This was only 2 weeks ago, in the words of GSP

[Raven]

Raven with the bigotry bads

it's not my fault that the quality of the remaining qbs is defined by their race tbh, and since i hate almost any team that is not mine, i may as well "pull" for the better one.

[Raven]

how the are you immune from the wrath of patfan tbh? you nail them as hard as anybody but never a peep. i mention the pats and they come with pitchforks and video cameras

he's not annoying basically, it's alright to talk as long as you make some good takes here and there and when your is at least sort of supported by some facts..

[spurraider21]

he's not annoying basically, it's alright to talk as long as you make some good takes here and there and when your is at least sort of supported by some facts..

congrats for copying what was said by other posters, further confirming that you just piggyback off of others on this forum, which is what Lincoln noted a few weeks back. claiming you'd rather have your team's arch-rival in peyton manning win the superbowl than "some dumb black qb" is beyond moronic

[spurraider21]

Tbh not hating on raven because a lot of posters do this but he/she has always struck me as a type of guy that just bandwagons upper tier posters takes and runs with it (not a bad thing, just my opinion)

[Raven]

congrats for copying what was said by other posters, further confirming that you just piggyback off of others on this forum, which is what Lincoln noted a few weeks back. claiming you'd rather have your team's arch-rival in peyton manning win the superbowl than "some dumb black qb" is beyond moronic

wow, you really are butthurt.. now you even expect an answer from only one fan when you call out every fan. Do you expect some sort of essay for such a random question? I mean, what could be the answer ..

[spurraider21]

wow, you really are butthurt.. now you even expect an answer from only one fan when you call out every fan. Do you expect some sort of essay for such a random question? I mean, what could be the answer ..

to say i don't back up my takes with facts/stats is hilarious. trying to play this off as "you're butthurt" or "you're mad" just tells me you have no clue.

do yourself a favor and reread this thread, including the observations by the spectating posters

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=225832

[Raven]

to say i don't back up my takes with facts/stats is hilarious. trying to play this off as "you're butthurt" or "you're mad" just tells me you have no clue.

it's not in my style, but for you i guess i can't find another answer as to why hearing the same thing twice (and it's not even the same) disturbs you so much even when you call out a large number of people..

[spurraider21]

i dont mind hearing the same answer twice. in fact i'm getting used to it since that's essentially what i hear almost every time you post

[Raven]

i dont mind hearing the same answer twice. in fact i'm getting used to it since that's essentially what i hear almost every time you post

what is your problem with pats anyway?

[spurraider21]

what is your problem with pats anyway?

i don't like them very much. that has nothing to do with what i said on this thread though. first thing i did was just answer OP's question from an unbiased point of view

[Raven]

i don't like them very much. that has nothing to do with what i said on this thread though. first thing i did was just answer OP's question from an unbiased point of view

so, to put into perspective, i'm a ty poster and you are not because:
-my argument about you being butthurt is wrong and childish, but you said mono is salty about some comment in week 1, in this very topic
-i say the things other say (which is blatantly false btw) over and over, and yet you keep talking about spygate and the t rule since i don't know when


and at you being unbiased at anything and at calling me whatever for preferring a better qb to win when it's not my team anyway..

[spurraider21]

so, to put into perspective, i'm a ty poster and you are not because:
-my argument about you being butthurt is wrong and childish, but you said mono is salty about some comment in week 1, in this very topic
-i say the things other say (which is blatantly false btw) over and over, and yet you keep saying about spygate and the t rule since i don't know when


and at you being unbiased at anything and at calling me whatever for preferring a better qb to win when it's not my team anyway..

- mono has been referencing my Aaron Dobson/Louis Murphy comment darn near every week, so yeah i think that's actually a fair comment. calling me butthurt because i made one response to your comment is weak.
- i never accused you of repeating yourself over and over. i said (and so have others) that you just copy-cat/piggy-back other posters

- read my original answer to OP and tell me where my bias came in. from a patfan perspective, the last thing i would want is for manning to ring. as it stands now, the main arguments for brady>manning (which is a big deal for patfan, i assume), is that the pats have won a majority of the h2h matchups against manning, and have an edge in superbowls. giving manning a shot to gain ground in both isn't ideal from a legacy perspective. i think its weird for a patfan to say he'd rather have manning win the superbowl than the niners, panthers

[Spur-Addict]

i dont mind hearing the same answer twice. in fact i'm getting used to it since that's essentially what i hear almost every time you post

[monosylab1k]

- mono has been referencing my Aaron Dobson/Louis Murphy comment darn near every week, so yeah i think that's actually a fair comment.

no need for revisionist history. I mocked your initial re ed comment, then left it alone. After Dobson got hurt and played very little at the end of the season, YOU started bringing it up every week as if you were vindicated somehow. Patsobsession