Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 129
  1. #51
    Veteran RD2191's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    51,864
    Waiving MT is not the issue - it's the logic. If they believe he was a PF only, why even bother signing him? If you believe he had improved his 3PT shot enough to guarantee his money, why then lose faith after one month of not so good 3PT shooting?

    The money aspect is irrelevant to me. Its the logic and the fact they want to replace his spot on the roster with a guy who sucks. Others might suck too, but there are a few guys who appear to be better fits and suck less with more upside.
    I've lost all faith in the FO tbh.

  2. #52
    Veteran Chomag's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    8,772
    Looks like RC may be drinking again.

  3. #53
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    I've lost all faith in the FO tbh.
    I wouldn't go that far

  4. #54
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    Waiving MT is not the issue - it's the logic. If they believe he was a PF only, why even bother signing him?
    Because if he was able to shoot constantly 3 pointers, he would have been something special.

    If you believe he had improved his 3PT shot enough to guarantee his money, why then lose faith after one month of not so good 3PT shooting?
    Because his hot 3 point shooting has only last 5 games.

    Thomas first 5 D-League games: 16/27 from behind the arc.
    Thomas next 8 D-league games: 4/19 from behind the arc.

  5. #55
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    I am not pissed that Thomas was waived.

    But I would be pissed if they waived him to get a scrub like Othyus Jeffers.
    Well, it would only be a 10 day contract. Some of the players mentioned might not be interested in signing that kind of contract.

  6. #56
    Banned
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    12,323
    Looks like RC may be drinking again.
    Yeah, he's doing a lot of second guessing it seems like.

  7. #57
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Because if he was able to shoot constantly 3 pointers, he would have been something special.



    Because his hot 3 point shooting has only last 5 games.

    Thomas first 5 D-League games: 16/27 from behind the arc.
    Thomas next 8 D-league games: 4/19 from behind the arc.
    Sure, but the Spurs had a lot of one on one time with him in practice. They surely didn't sign him based off just what they saw in the D League..If they signed him, worked with him and guaranteed his deal, I don't see why they would sour on him because of his next 19 shots..

  8. #58
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Thomas was still shooting better than Jeffers. Rebounds better and is taller to block shots.

  9. #59
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Exactly . So, a guy with guaranteed money who does everything better than the guy you want waive him for gets waived for that guy? Ok I guess. It's obviously not the end of the world and we are discussing a limited role type guy, but wow.

  10. #60
    Defense Wins Championships Texas_Ranger's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    13,364
    So they cut a scrub so they can sign an even worse scrub. lol Spurs

  11. #61
    Veteran Floyd Pacquiao's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    6,918
    I am not pissed that Thomas was waived.

    But I would be pissed if they waived him to get a scrub like Othyus Jeffers.
    My thoughts exactly

  12. #62
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    Sure, but the Spurs had a lot of one on one time with him in practice. They surely didn't sign him based off just what they saw in the D League..If they signed him, worked with him and guaranteed his deal, I don't see why they would sour on him because of his next 19 shots..
    Spurs could have been on the fence about it at the guaranteed deadline. Just before that deadline, Thomas had some kind of concussion and Spurs could have put his strugglings on it.

    Something to consider is Chip input on that subject. He might have said that Thomas needed to tweak is shooting form to become a reliable 3 point shooter. Chip and Thomas worked together on tweaking it but it didn't worked so Chip told Pop that he likely wouldn't be able to turn him into a good 3 point shooter.

  13. #63
    Veteran SpursRock20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Post Count
    1,827
    You know it's bad when even the smart ones on this forum can't really figure this move out.

  14. #64
    Banned wildchild's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    2,348
    Spurs are so far below the tax that they could afford this kind of move financially wise. They can "waste" a few $100K easily.

    What made Thomas special was his new found 3 point shooting and he has been atrocious for about 1 month in that area. Not only was he missing his shots, but he was missing them badly. If Spurs have reached the conclusion that his early 3 point shooting streak was a fluke and that he would likely never be a good 3 point shooter, waiving him isn't a big deal.
    Obviously Spurs can live without Thomas, but he's a really good defender -and athletic-.
    He knows the Spurs systems better than other new guy of D-League, what was the problem if Spurs kept the guy in the team?
    He isn't a 3's shooter? Well, we need defense right now.

  15. #65
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    Obviously Spurs can live without Thomas, but he's a really good defender -and athletic-.
    He knows the Spurs systems better than other new guy of D-League, what was the problem if Spurs kept the guy in the team?
    He isn't a 3's shooter? Well, we need defense right now.
    Well, you're talking about Thomas covering up perimeter players, something he has very little or even never done. I'm not sold on him being "really good" at that.

  16. #66
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Well, you're talking about Thomas covering up perimeter players, something he has very little or even never done. I'm not sold on him being "really good" at that.
    But don't we already know that Jeffers isn't?

  17. #67
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    The only thing that makes sense to me is the Spurs soured on MT (no big deal) and with this Kawhi injury know they need a SF. In their search, no trade has come up that either they like or another team likes and many other available SF's won't sign with the Spurs either with a 10-day. So Jeffers is the first on the list (even if way down on the list) of things they can do.

    Seems a little out there, but maybe. I think they honestly believe Jeffers is the best option available which blows my mind.

  18. #68
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    But don't we already know that Jeffers isn't?
    Jeffers is presented as a good defender and unlike Thomas, he has played some SF in his career.

    Now, I'm' not a fan of a potential Jeffers signing. To me, it would be clearly just a temporary emergency answer.

  19. #69
    Banned wildchild's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    2,348
    Well, you're talking about Thomas covering up perimeter players, something he has very little or even never done. I'm not sold on him being "really good" at that.
    I know, he's more PF (even he played as C in Fisher's system and Kawhi as PF) but he's versatile. There are worse things in the world than have an athletic guy like him in the team.
    For example: Cory and Beli at SF.

  20. #70
    Big Body look_at_g_shred's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Post Count
    7,325
    Spurs trying to put a band-aid on a wound that requires surgery.

  21. #71
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Jeffers doesn't have to be the only move they make. If they were willing to eat Thomas' money, they'll eat a 10-day. I imagine they're still open to making moves, but rightfully, they don't need to panic. Whomever they get will be on the bench with a healthy rotation. They don't need to overpay for that.

  22. #72
    Veteran Libri's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    11,209
    And another Spurs savior bites the dust...



    Definitely. Probably Jeffers.
    beat me to it

  23. #73
    #21 timtonymanu's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    34,838
    Jeffers won't be on the roster in a few weeks anyway. We still have a while before the trade deadline too.

  24. #74
    Believe (in Bertans) ABC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    390
    they don't need to panic. Whomever they get will be on the bench with a healthy rotation. They don't need to overpay for that.
    Jeffers won't be on the roster in a few weeks anyway. We still have a while before the trade deadline too.
    Exactly. And by waiving Thomas instead of De Colo or Baynes they still have all their potential trade pieces available.

  25. #75
    I may or may not care. monkeypunk's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    1,280
    Is he eligible to be resigned by us after the injured guys come back?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •