It's not surprising, tbh.
Philly doesn't have the leverage, nor does L.A (Gasol) or Houston (Asik). When it's known that a team has no plans in keeping a player, usually the opposing teams carry all the leverage in potential trades. Teams usually offer the bare minimum, knowing their adversaries' desperation to get rid of the player.
Why is this? Teams are finally getting smarter-- teams are aware that it's better getting anything opposed to nothing if the player is in his last year of his contract, so they tend to try to offer the least valuable and relevant offer possible.
Teams trying to get rid of expendable bad contracts (good, overpaid players), or unwanted players in the last year of their contracts never have leverage in trades anymore.

Reply With Quote

another poster wants to trade my favorite scrub
