A solid "DNP" in a 127-96 rout of a team fighting for their playoff lives.
All of a sudden team performance without an allstar is important.
Well, guess what, even in his old and frail state ...
Lakers with Gasol:
21-38 (36% winning %)
Lakers without Gasol:
3-8 (27%)
Lakers with Kobe:
2-4 (33%)
Lakers without Kobe:
22-42 (34%)
Kirby: a solid "DNP" all season.
The Quit
Sample size importance to stats both op and your reply is silly
Well, guess what, even in his old and frail state ...
Lakers with Gasol:
21-38 (36% winning %)
Lakers without Gasol:
3-8 (27%)
Lakers with Kobe:
2-4 (33%)
Lakers without Kobe:
22-42 (34%)
Anal with more takes and threads per par
LOL they were playing the ing Knicks
GTFO got
Do you want I go over all the seasons where Kobe missed games?
And MVPau played and missed a decent amount of games this year. Seems like A fair sample.
The kicker:::SF's people wouldn't step off his throat long enough to spare him a V last Spring thus safely securing Pau's perfect playoff record sans Kobe.
tee, hee.
You've nary room, the Spurs swept your Kirby out of the Great Western Forum. Christ!
Oh, that's right you guys have that thing.
8-2 in their last 10. Sit your ing ass down.LOL they were playing the ing Knicks
GTFO got
The house that Wilt, Kareem & Magic built, & your Kirby allowed Duncan to take a wrecking ball to it. Christ!Oh, that's right you guys have that thing.
Their last 10 games didn't feature one playoff team tbh.
So KK81 wants a larger sample size, here it is. Year by year breakdown:
Young Buck Years:
96-97 - 48-23 w Kobe, 8-3 w/o (68% winning % vs. 73%)
97-98 - 58-21 (74%) vs. 3-0 (100%)
98-99 - Didn't miss any games
Overall - 137-63 (69%) vs. 11-3 (79%)
2nd banana to Shaq years:
99-00 - 55-11 (83%) vs. 12-4 (75%)
00-01 - 45-23 (66%) vs. 11-3 (79%)
01-02 - 56-24 (70%) vs. 2-0 (100%)
02-03 - Didn't miss any games
03-04 - 48-17 (74%) vs. 8-9 (47%) (Only season Kobe had a significant +ve impact, but Shaq missed a lot of those Kobe missed games as well)
Overall: 254-107 (70%) vs. 33-16 (67%)
Kobe as the lead years:
04-05 - 28-38 (42%) vs. 6-10 (38%)
05-06 - 45-35 (56%) vs. 0-2 (0%)
06-07 - 39-38 (51%) vs. 3-2 (60%)
Overall: 112-111 (50%) vs. 9-14 (39%)
MVPau years:
07-08 - Didn't miss any games
08-09 - Didn't miss any games
09-10 - 51-22 (70%) vs. 6-3 (67%)
10-11 - Didn't miss any games
11-12 - 36-22 (62%) vs. 5-3 (63%)
12-13 - 42-36 (54%) vs. 3-1 (75%)
Overall: 308-147 (68%) vs. 14-7 (67%)
Grand overall: 811-428 (65%) vs. 67-40 (63%)
Overall, Kobe had no effect in any stage of his career, except him being top dog and leading the Lakers to a missed playoffs and two first round exits, but even then, the Lakers were actually 6-8 in 04-05 without Kobe but with Odom, which is the same winning % as the Lakers with Kobe.
Fine. You take that one. Me? I'm stickin' with 6.
Didn't stop Media from climbing on that wagon once Phil was the teamster.
2004 trumps it.
You're full of .
Dale, wavin' the white flag.
That fell on Shaq tbh. I remember the Spurs would triple and quadruple team the fat bas and their shooters (especially Glen Rice & Kobe) that year were building some great houses in South LA.
Tim had a monster series against the Lakers that year. There was a time when fans would travel all the way from St Croix to see Tim play. Did they run of money cause i haven't seen them since.
Can't blame them cause desperation & Brooklyn has caused Dolan to throw some serious money at Phil.
A 68 year old earning $12 mil/yr for the next 5 is
...6 put a damper on things.
tee, hee.
And 24-46 overall. Now shut the up
Its no coincidence the Lakers declined in 2011 because Pau Gasol's play declined. Hes the real reason they won 2 championships.
6 also set the tone for Tim's continued drive this year. He'll surpass 2 pretty soon in the all time rankings now that Piano's been busy with his curricular activities while collecting his 30.5.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
