He hit some big shots in the 4th. I believe he hit a pair of 3's that helped bury the Refs.
I love how the OP talks about Parker not passing the ball, then ignores that he had 12 assists.
Tony deserves an A, not the B- the OP gave him.
Giving Timmy a B- is also a travesty. Does the OP think we win without Timmy's dominant offensive performance? Sure, he had the matchup advantage much of the game, but still.
And then the OP has the gall to give Manu a C, who scored crucial baskets in the third quarter when things were heading south and had 18 second-half points, including several in the fourth quarter that put the game out of reach.
I mean...![]()
![]()
But Kawhi got an A+, of course... Kawhi could put up a 4 points, 2 rebounds, 2-16 FG line and probably get an A- from the OP, tbqh.
He hit some big shots in the 4th. I believe he hit a pair of 3's that helped bury the Refs.
This grades are pure bull .
OP is bull , tbh.
So we judge the game based on what he did for 5 minutes and what Duncan did on the offensive end in the first half?
It's gotta be about the totatalliy of the game..
Makes me sad how people expected a Grade A for Duncan when he was awful defensively. I specifically said Manu saved our ass in the third, but hey I guess in a game grade we should just forgot the awful things he did in the game.
I said Tony was phenomnal assisting the ball in the first quarter..I don't understand why we get so many butthurt people. He got 3 in the second half total.
Serious bias in several of these grades.
Tim, Tony, & Manu - too low, especially Manu.
K & Verde - tad too high.
If those 5 minutes help slam the door then that certainly affects his grade.
Not every player is going to be absolutely flawless for 20 or 30 minutes. If he comes up big in money time then it certainly should bump their grade.
Sure, but are we suppose to give a player an A if he scored 5 points in the last minute but was part of the reason why the game was even close to begin with? NO..
Manu was on his way to get a D..He had an awesome third so he got a C..Tony was on his way to get an A, he was bad in the second half so he got a B..Duncan was on his way to get an A, but he was bad in the second half so get a B.
Funniest I've ever read
Lol awesome
You gave Baynes an A for 5 minutes of work. I'm sure there was a minute in the game where he didn't get a rebound, point , or assist. The point isn't to diminish Baynes, but maybe guys like Tim and Manu were called on to do different things at different points in the game. Give a grade on impact, not a missed shot or two in the first half or a failure to stop Durrant from hitting a pick and roll jumper on a possession.
too bad the trolls ran off the site owners when they started low-balling their private life. shame shame.
Wrong again.
Tony had 6 assists in the first half and six assists in the second half. He didn't score as much in the second half because, as he said, "It was what they were giving me…". In other words, he read the thunder defense perfectly, took fewer shots himself the Spurs didn't need him to score, and he got the ball to people who were scoring.
It was the perfect way to play the game for the pg.
at arguing about grades
I'm cool with apo grades based on expectation not pure performance, that's why baynes can get a A for 5 mn knowing we don't expect anything from him and he did well in 5 mn.
Then after you can disagree with the comments
that's always how timvp's grades were set up.
Argentinean fans not liking Manu's C tbh![]()
oh and yeah imo manu is not a C but a A+ based on expectations tbh fwiw
there's a reason I don't do grades anymore
Kinda sad how low your expectations are for Kawhi if shooting 40% while allowing KD to shoot over 50% is as good as you think he can be...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)