Doubt it, he's old though, I doubt he wants to get his ass handed to him, tbh.
Sometimes spurraider is a good dude, when he is discussing something he knows something about, unlike now.
But he uses straw man tactics quite a bit in the hopes it will help his point by twisting one of my statements into his straw man conclusion of being contradicting of myself, when any intelligent poster knows they were two different statements about two different things.
But does he get specific? No, because to do so would have shown there were no contradictions.
I didn't go after anyone. rocks/glass house, etc....
I doubt DMC or spurraider will man up, they have no conceptions of discussions.
But you two keep owning them.
Like an idiot I keep trying to answer their idiotic questions.
I've taken you to the woodshed a few times in these discussions already and each time you abandon the thread.I doubt DMC or spurraider will man up, they have no conceptions of discussions.
But you two keep owning them.
Like an idiot I keep trying to answer their idiotic questions.
In your dreams.
Now you with the straw man too?
I can only laugh at your folly.
Coming from a guy who thinks an event can be both allegorical/symbolic and factual
What's there for me to man up about? My views are explicitly laid out and I've never shied away. You are the one who hasn't been able to tell me if he believes in the story of Abraham or notI doubt DMC or spurraider will man up, they have no conceptions of discussions.
But you two keep owning them.
Like an idiot I keep trying to answer their idiotic questions.
Be back in a bit. Nephew took over the comp.
Go look at Avante's thread on religion, where you aborted...In your dreams.
Now you with the straw man too?
I can only laugh at your folly.
Dude, you take this way too seriously, it is merely a "discussion" on a "message board".Coming from a guy who thinks an event can be both allegorical/symbolic and factual
I drew from at least four different sources to aid in your understanding with extreme detail the last time, and you still didn't get it.
Why?
Because of your constant pestering, and refusal to accept the answer the first time I gave it.
So it is blatantly obvious to the intelligent posters on here, Rob, SBM, and RG what your "game" was all along.
You had no intentions of seeking an answer, you just wanted something to nitpick about and argue over.
That was obvious with your first straw man, and the clincher was saying I was contradicting my own words when you took thos two statements totally and completely out of context in order to twist them to your idiotic and confused ends.
You should have just stopped last night after my first answer and done the research yourself instead of asking me to do it.
Aborted?
I never aborted anything.
But you can pretend I did if it makes you feel better.
I'm not playing a game or building strawman arguments. I just want to know if you believe the story of Abraham actually, factually occurred. That's it. No games
You plagiarized and got busted. Stop acting like you were using sources. When you meld in that without citing sources, you're plagiarizing. It's not a big deal, but you did it because you cannot make sense of your statements without needing someone else to guide you out of the maze you've created. The allegory explanation doesn't address whether or not the story was based on real events. Just as the story of Job, of Noah, even of Jesus Christ's miracles and the resurrection could be allegories, they form the basic tenents of Christianity. So if your're saying Christianity is based on a series of allegories that the reader must accept as truths in order to see the stories as real, then you have no disagreement from me.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post7528106Aborted?
I never aborted anything.
But you can pretend I did if it makes you feel better.
Geez, straw man on top of straw man here.
I am not going to defend another one of your worthless claims just because you do not understand literary writing.
There is no publishing going on here.
^Get that in your head. ^
Thus I don't have to cite every single sentence in a message board nor does anyone else on here.
It just gives you a transitory yet shallow feeling of some sort of hollow fic ious victory, for whatever gets you your rocks off.
I even explained this a few times already, and why. But that isn't good enough for you because your only aim is to nitpick and make mountains out of mole hills.
I guess that story about religious people blurring fiction and reality was a case study of xmas1997
That is what you are claiming is an abortion?
Dude, you don't even know when you are being laughed at for belaboring the obvious to the point of being ridiculously negligible.
Thus your straw man conclusion.'Not to mention you never made a single valid point in that thread but kept acting like you did.
That is deluding yourself, not me.
Try again. That one doesn't fly.
I said it's not a big deal, but you did try to pass it off as your own thoughts. That's dishonest and indicates your level of intellectual honesty here and your true intent. Your writings are not as elegant, and it shows your lack of research and even consideration for the topic. You're not even a good troll.
You kept agreeing with me and expounding on it. What's amusing is that I was just copying and pasting blurbs from other sites without any semblance of continuity with the topic. You were in hog heaven.That is what you are claiming is an abortion?
Dude, you don't even know when you are being laughed at for belaboring the obvious to the point of being ridiculously negligible.
Thus your straw man conclusion.'Not to mention you never made a single valid point in that thread but kept acting like you did.
That is deluding yourself, not me.
Try again. That one doesn't fly.
His kung fu is weak.
Coming from a guy who thinks an event can be both allegorical/symbolic and factual
I disagree. As I noted to blake it is always good to at least to get what you really think typed out and clear. It is fun, even with trolls, to pick apart the foolishness for what it is. Often the trolls will ape the stuff they hear others say, so it isn't entirely pointless. The obvious baiting by Rob et al, is fairly easy to side step.
The true meaning is that the person ordering someone to sacrifice their own kid to them is an evil . The guy who agrees to do it is an evil .
Lastly, I would point out that God didn't stop Jepthah.
Ah You "know" that. How exactly do you "know" that? Magic book again?
Or maybe you are hearing voices? Prophet Bob?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote