Sure it does, and that's what it teaches.
You don't. You repeatedly say things about it that are provably false.
Your understanding of evolution is "basic" but gets the science and evidence wrong in many respects.
If you want me to show that, I would be happy to step you through why I say that.
If you really wanted to understand the theory of evolution, you could spend time on a few videos that outline the evidence for the theory of evolution.
More basically, you should first understand what "theory" means in the scientific sense.
I agree with this also, especially the part I put in bold, and most especially the underlined part.
it doesn't. the greatest moments of science are when they destroy old scientific stances.
Think about what you're asking. If you think hard enough this can be used against evolution.
no. no. and just. no. this is why i say you dont understand the theory of evolution.
Did someone say RANDOM?
Evolution isn't random at all. Mutations are, evolution is not.
In this case, anything scientifically proven.
Science has it, but you do not.
BINGO BANGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So tell us all again about how science has things figured out.
Feel free to present an alternative theory about atavisms. The theory of evolution explains this phenomena quite well.
where did i say that in the first place, so that i can tell you "again"
Change in the genetic makeup of a population. That's literally what it means.
I could have sworn you were backing what science says about all this.....no you aren't?
i'm asking for a specific example.
thats a very long explanation. i would recommend a textbook. or if you want later i can search for a source which will at least present the theory to you, whether you agree or not, i think its important you understand what the actual theory is instead of those stupid pictures you copy-paste
i never claimed that science has it all figured out. if you are putting words in my mouth, its a different story
According to your god when he "wrote" the 10 Commandments.. there are.
"Evolutionarily, traits that have disappeared phenotypically do not necessarily disappear from an organism's DNA. The gene sequence often remains, but is inactive."
"Such an unused gene may remain in the genome for many generations."
We aren't discussing my understanding, we are discussing yours.
First you have to understand what a theory is.
To you, what is a theory in the scientific sense?
Another scienticic fact proven false:
A young Earth: In the mid-1800s many scientists, including Lord Kelvin, believed the Earth to be just 20 million to 40 million years old. It was around that time that geologists such as Charles Lyell began to believe that the Earth was much older, and this conformed to the views of biologists such as Charles Darwin, who needed a much older Earth for evolution to unfold. It wasn’t until the middle of the 20th century that scientists came to the accepted conclusion today that the Earth is about 4.55 billion years old.
If anyone is really wondering about the progression of things, it goes: mutation, evolution, natural or human selection (or random events like catastrophes), evolution, speciation, evolution ... (repeat thousands of times) Evolution.
Okay so you laugh at me for using a book and now you're recommending a book? Smh.
why do you keep saying "fact" proven false, when the segment you copy-pasted says "believed"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote