Who was the better player in the playoffs between Manu and Kawhi?

[Brazil]

Brazil protecting Manu

Never thought Id see this day

it means you don't pay a lot attention. I've always been a Manu fan

[dabom]

you suck at this tbh

Manu scored 14 ppg same total than Kawhi with an equivalent TS% plus he was the primary ball handler off the bench. He gave 4 assists per game vs. 1,7 for Kawhi, 6 per 36 same as Parker. His scoring per 36 is the best of the team at 20 ppg. So no their offensive numbers are absolutely not comparable.

But manu can't ing play more than 25mpg you stupid .

[100%duncan]

it means you don't pay a lot attention. I've always been a Manu fan

Forgive me senpai

I'd advise you to stop wasting your time researching facts on bball references though, they won't accept it tbh. Kawhi>All.

[Brazil]

He knows Parker is next.

As for OP it's a toss up

For me most consistent and valuable player of this PO is Duncan
Then Manu and Kawhi
Then Tony
Then Split / Boris / Green / Mills

self explanatory tbh

make it stop tbh... you are hurting my feelings

[dabom]

Forgive me senpai

I'd advise you to stop wasting your time researching facts on bball references though, they won't accept it tbh. Kawhi>All.

Kawhi had more winshares than manu. WTF?!

[ElNono]

this thread

[Brazil]

But manu can't ing play more than 25mpg you stupid .

you still suck at that

I was expecting you will forget about the rest of the post... "Manu scored 14 ppg same total than Kawhi with an equivalent TS% plus he was the primary ball handler off the bench. He gave 4 assists per game vs. 1,7 for Kawhi" So in less time he scored the same amount of points with the same efficiency being the primary ball handler with TP when on the court dishing 4 apg and yet you are saying Kawhi offensively did as good as Manu

As a reminder Spurs played 23 POs games not just the last 3 games against Miami.

[dabom]

this thread

Tons of manu s tbh.

[dabom]

you still suck at that

I was expecting you will forget about the rest of the post... "Manu scored 14 ppg same total than Kawhi with an equivalent TS% plus he was the primary ball handler off the bench. He gave 4 assists per game vs. 1,7 for Kawhi" So in less time he scored the same amount of points with the same efficiency being the primary ball handler with TP when on the court dishing 4 apg and yet you are saying Kawhi offensively did as good as Manu

As a reminder Spurs played 23 POs games not just the last 3 games against Miami.

Kawhi with more winshares, more winshares per 48. An 18 point differential per 100 possessions vs manus 10point diferential per 100 possessions.
Are people ing blind?

[ElNono]

Like I said in the other thread, I absolutely love Kawhi, his future looks bright and he's on the right path, but he's become massively overrated by some peeps in here. In their defense, people tend to have short memory, and magnify the most recent events, so it's not something uncommon at all...

I'm actually looking forward to Kawhi showing Durant he's more than just a 'system player'... that was certainly a made comment.

[Brazil]

Forgive me senpai

I'd advise you to stop wasting your time researching facts on bball references though, they won't accept it tbh. Kawhi>All.

btw I'm not saying Manu had a better PO run than Kawhi tbh, it's for me really a toss up. Both have been the biggest strenght of the Spurs behind Duncan. Parker is a step below even if in PER the three are close: 19 for Parker, 19,4 for Kawhi and 20 for Manu. Now we should spend more time sucking Duncan balls than discussing Kawhi vs Manu.

[RD2191]

Manudona? Glad that dude ain't biased.

[Brazil]

Kawhi with more winshares, more winshares per 48. An 18 point differential per 100 possessions vs manus 10point diferential per 100 possessions.
Are people ing blind?

again you suck at this

we were talking about offensive production

try to keep up

[dabom]

again you suck at this

we were talking about offensive production

try to keep up

We aren't talking about offensive production. We are talking about who played better in the ing playoffs. WTF?!

[100%duncan]

Now we should spend more time sucking Duncan balls than discussing Kawhi vs Manu.

Agreed.

[Brazil]

We aren't talking about offensive production. We are talking about who played better in the ing playoffs. WTF?!

Check their offensive numbers. They are comparable even though the system is relied on manu. And then when you look at their defense, Kawhi blows him out the water.
How hard is that for you to understand?

you suck at this tbh

Manu scored 14 ppg same total than Kawhi with an equivalent TS% plus he was the primary ball handler off the bench. He gave 4 assists per game vs. 1,7 for Kawhi, 6 per 36 same as Parker. His scoring per 36 is the best of the team at 20 ppg. So no their offensive numbers are absolutely not comparable.

boy, here is the thing whether you have a brain and you try to keep up or go post on the Club or something.

Your argument is globally, correct me if I'm wrong, Kawhi has the same O production than Manu and he is superior in D so Kawhi > Manu these POs.

My post and the part I highlighted in bold made pretty clear I was challenging your assumption that Kawhi O production is equivalent to Manu's production.

[Brazil]

For the rest winshares like other metrics are tool to help us out measuring player's impact. The fact Kawhi has more winshares than Manu does not mean Kawhi has a better run than Manu these POs. You go with winshares, I go with PER. Kawhi has a 19,4 PER Manu has a 20 PER so Manu > Kawhi. stupid

[dabom]

For the rest winshares like other metrics are tool to help us out measuring player's impact. The fact Kawhi has more winshares than Manu does not mean Kawhi has a better run than Manu these POs. You go with winshares, I go with PER. Kawhi has a 19,4 PER Manu has a 20 PER so Manu > Kawhi. stupid

"PER strives to measure a player's per-minute performance, while adjusting for pace"

PER is a per-minute measurement
Kawhi plays 10 more ing minutes than Manu, he is the better player. He brings more to this team than Manu this postseason.
Manu can't play 35mpg or more or else he gets ing injured. You stupid !

[Brazil]

"PER strives to measure a player's per-minute performance, while adjusting for pace"

PER is a per-minute measurement
Kawhi plays 10 more ing minutes than Manu, he is the better player. He brings more to this team than Manu this postseason.
Manu can't play 35mpg or more or else he gets ing injured. You stupid !

oh I was indeed debating with an idiot

[ElNono]

For the rest winshares like other metrics are tool to help us out measuring player's impact. The fact Kawhi has more winshares than Manu does not mean Kawhi has a better run than Manu these POs. You go with winshares, I go with PER. Kawhi has a 19,4 PER Manu has a 20 PER so Manu > Kawhi. stupid

Yeah, it's pretty silly. It's like trying to bring up 'minutes' without looking at usage rate... I mean, this stuff isn't anything new...

[dabom]

oh I was indeed debating with an idiot

Next please!

[Brazil]

Yeah, it's pretty silly. It's like trying to bring up 'minutes' without looking at usage rate... I mean, this stuff isn't anything new...

this dabom is another class of stupid tbh
dat new gnsf wave

[dabom]

Yeah, it's pretty silly. It's like trying to bring up 'minutes' without looking at usage rate... I mean, this stuff isn't anything new...

He gets that many points without a lot of usage? WTF. He must be better than manu then.
So PER and Winshares proves KL was the better player in the playoffs than Manu. Even PER100 possesions Kawhi did better by 80% more.
You are just so blind.

[ElNono]

this dabom is another class of stupid tbh
dat new gnsf wave

It kinda started since reaching the Finals last season... there was this influx of NASF and frontrunners... one of the few drawbacks of ringing, tbh

[dabom]

this dabom is another class of stupid tbh
dat new gnsf wave

2 people. Me and Spence.
That's a huge wave if you ask me.