Dude done got banned.![]()
Quite a few. Can't really put a finger on it. Like you said, it's been a while.
As much as you are in love with your own opinion, the general public do not share that view. The general view is the chick should have done more to stop it to it was an unfortunate incident and Namath didn't mean it, not much was said about him being some one of pervert who sexually harassed someone on live tv.
Dude done got banned.![]()
Sorry, comments from one internets page do not reflect the whole of public opinion.
lol "general view"
Was about to bring this up.
I don't recall Rampage getting anywhere near as much flack for doing worse .
There are multiple articles about the incident, along with comments. You are free to look them up.
And general views mean general views from the perspective of sportswriters and other netizens, since we are talking about the internet backlash right now. They may not reflect the general consensus of the entire world, but it certainly is a larger group that "you".
Holy that was awkward.
You could tell she was freaked/grossed out by it, tbh.
i laugh at this every time i see it.
I will let you post all of them from both sides, since it is your claim to back up. Otherwise your speculation is as worthless as any other baseless internet claim.
So far, you only have one.
Get cracking.
Gotta get the threeway going tbh.
Tbh that was
1) while the mainstream media still regarded the UFC as savage (so rampage was just acting savage there, nothing unusual with that) or just didn't cover it. It's gotten a lot more news coverage since it's become more of a "real" sport.
2) before the tumblr/social justice warriors came out in full force. 2009 was a lonnggg time ago in internet years
Seriously responding to this guy
I hope amb doesn't waste his time on this tbh
Just pointing out how fruitless it is to try and get away with claims that one knows the opinion of the entire internets after reading a couple of comments.
I don't expect him to look up anymore, so his claim will remain unsupported.
http://www.google.com/
Type: Namath harass reporter. The links will appear.
Now read them all and claim otherwise.
I read 25+ articles, and from a sampling point of view, a sample of 25 articles provide an 80% confidence interval of being a representative sample.
I already made my claim.
Great that you think that.I read 25+ articles, and from a sampling point of view, a sample of 25 articles provide an 80% confidence interval of being a representative sample.
Post the links.
I already did. Instructions to getting the links are the same as links.
Nope.
Sorry, they are not. Just say you didn't do it. Less embarrassing for you.
Of course they are. Follow the links. 3 of the first 25 articles referred to what namath did as sexual harassment. That's only 12%.
lol nope
Why not?
lol treating the first page of one Google search results as representative of all internets reactions
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)