lynch is fed up with wilson taking credit and money for his and D's wins, that's all that there is. And it's hard to say he is not right, i mean just checking the TD/INT ratio against the elite 4 qb is beyond laughable
I know what you meant. But he listed the defensive holding along with HGH testing and you laughed about the decline of the defense. Also, you are probably quite foolish to think teams had no idea HGH testing was coming.
lynch is fed up with wilson taking credit and money for his and D's wins, that's all that there is. And it's hard to say he is not right, i mean just checking the TD/INT ratio against the elite 4 qb is beyond laughable
laughed at the decline of the defense? not really, they lost significant corner depth and its hurting them bad
Don't they have their big name/big money check my stats guys?
what does that have to do with me supposedly laughing at the decline of their defense?
Their Defense looks fine to me. Could possibly use some younger bodies upfront but I see a talent disparity on Offense. By trading Harvin they essentially lost both their starting WRs from the Super Bowl
Red Bryant, Chris Clemons, Walter Thurmond, Brandon Browner were all losses that they're feeling now. They have other guys to step in, but last year their front 7 rotated more than anybody in the NFL, and right now with the injuries at corner they're really missing the crazy depth they had last season
but they play the raiders next week so there's that![]()
he's only 28? seems like he's been in the league a long time, I thought he was 31 or 32
that will be the Skull ening, with the media giving Wilson all the credit. he's a rich man's McNabb, which is good, just still overrated by a media hungry for BBC.
bitter niner fan is bitter![]()
eh not quite. that's more of my rush limbaugh side. i already said i have no problem if people consider him better than Kaep currently.
Russell Wilson is an amazing QB he plays smart, he doesn't lose games.
He threw for over 300 yards and ran for over 100, no QB in history had ever done that, miserable????
that was against St. Louis, not Dallas
That's right , my bad.
Bottom line is he'd doing things never seen before by QB's with his experience.
As of today, yes he is 28. Next year, 29. And with quite a bit of tread to boot. Probably has two maybe three solid years left after this season if preserved properly.
The whole team was miserable against Dallas. They had a chance to win it but allowed one of his year's patented 3 and long completions. I believe they've already doubled 20 yards + 3rd Down conversions they had last year.
Notice how quick Seahawk fan is to throw their heroes under the bus when defending GMW
Nobody is throwing anybody under the bus. Running backs tend to all decline around the same time
No not really.
There are outliers like emmitt smith, but surely somebody like yourself can understand "trends"
how many running backs in recent years have maintained effectiveness after 30? I guess Fred Jackson but he had very low mileage
I just can't help myself, rough times over here at the moment. As a Bills fan, I figured you'd have a substantial amount of insight on this matter. How does a team handle all the roadblocks, trials and tribulations after a SB victory? Thanks in advance![]()
Frank Gore, Steven Jackson are both still effective with no end in sight. I won't bore you with all those "once upon a time" guys very productive after 30. All very active their whole career.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)