The ST double standard ...

[Cry Havoc]

This thread is hot, almost like a game thread.
Parker looks like 2004 Shaq, he cant have 25 points every night anymore I know all the injuries, Jones fracture ACL torn shoulder achilles tendonitis but he keeps trying too hard almost forgetting there is a team playing with him and a clock running, Pop deserves some blame too we have 2 decent options as backup PG.

Cojo was a stupid hot mess last night. Patty was one of the few Spurs who actually played well. I wouldn't have a problem with Patty taking Cojo's minutes, especially if he's hitting. When he's on, he spaces the floor better than almost anyone else we have, because he can drive pretty well too.

[Leetonidas]

11 pages in 2 hours.

Brazil

[still.focused]

My only suue with KL was the 4 TOs last night
He didnt play great but considering they dbl pretty aggressive hid wasnt bad
Again aside from the 4 turnovers

[SASdynasty!]

I said he never got his own magazine covers. You immediately deflected to "commemorative editions" and video game covers. Maybe if you'd wipe Enrique's off your screen, you'd be able to read what people are actually saying better.

So what you're saying is Tony Parker is on zero non-commemorative magazine covers that also do not feature any other Spurs players especially in the event where Tony is not centered in the photograph (or if he is, has his name listed below other players names somewhere on the cover)...except for Slam Magazine, Slamdunk, or Beckett (which of course he is featured on by your exact standards which do not include all the above stipulations).

[TheGreatYacht]

Remember when you actually riled people up. Not anymore.

I swear to god, I've never seen anyone outside of Harlem/ his Alt's and Roberto reply to you people actually talk basketball with me, you just do your job which is being the bus' condom

[will_spurs]

I'd like to personally thank Brazil for starting this thread, as it's very useful to update my ignore list: there were a few morons I had missed and who decided to come out of the woodwork...

[jag]

arguing magazine covers with a Spurs fan pretending to be a Clippers fan

[Nathan89]

Kawhi had 18 points, 3 assists, 6 rebounds, 4 steals, and 4 turnovers. Parker had 10 points, 2 turnovers, 1 ASSIST, and 2 rebounds. And Parker is the highest paid player on the team. Nice try though got.

The "engine". Dude can't create for himself or others yet dribbles all game. Lets blame Kawhi though.

[FkLA]

This Parker vs Kawhi stuff is really odd. There are 4-5 posters who think they're dropping truth bombs by pointing out Tony's poor performances. As if everyone else can't see it as well. If they weren't re ed, they'd realize no one is defending Tony's poor play. People are just tired of the played out shtick.

There's no point in arguing with these people while bringing actual basketball takes, because they aren't concerned with the play or the results. They root for one or two players to do well, while also rooting against one or two players, then they take to the forums and run shtick.

You realize a French poster started this thread to basically imply Kawhi deserves more criticism for Game 1, right?

[Mikeanaro]

Cojo was a stupid hot mess last night. Patty was one of the few Spurs who actually played well. I wouldn't have a problem with Patty taking Cojo's minutes, especially if he's hitting. When he's on, he spaces the floor better than almost anyone else we have, because he can drive pretty well too.

Pop had options, Patty was hitting and got benched so Poppy deserves some blame, I dont get why they missed so many FTs that was bizarre.

[RD2191]

this is exactly what you about when somebody was using raw stat for defending Parker

make up your mind... raw stat are useful or not ? when Parker was with 18 pts shooting 7/12 you would use the +/- but this is not useful anymore ? sorry for highlighting your contradictions brah

I have never ever used the +/- stat when ting on Parker. I don't know where you got that from. I don't like it as sometimes it's influenced by who certain players are playing with. Parker's plus minus are usually pretty good because he gets carried by the starters. For instance he can be 3-8 shooting with 1 assists and be a +28. That wasn't the case last night though. He was -10 on 4-11 shooting with 1 assist. In other words he sucked, bad.

[Brazil]

arguing magazine covers with a Spurs fan pretending to be a Clippers fan

Dude still think there are people believing he is a clipper fan

[dabom]

The "engine". Dude can't create for himself or others yet dribbles all game. Lets blame Kawhi though.

Our Maestro is Manu tbh.

[will_spurs]

So what you're saying is Tony Parker is on zero non-commemorative magazine covers that also do not feature any other Spurs players especially in the event where Tony is not centered in the photograph (or if he is, has his name listed below other players names somewhere on the cover)...except for Slam Magazine, Slamdunk, or Beckett (which of course he is featured on by your exact standards which do not include all the above stipulations).

Get ready for "but I was obviously talking only about sports magazines covers!" and "but I was only talking about US covers"

[RD2191]

I wonder if this will make a cover?

[dabom]

You realize a French poster started this thread to basically imply Kawhi deserves more criticism for Game 1, right?

OP is a ing got. Leave parker alone.

[SASdynasty!]

arguing magazine covers with a Spurs fan pretending to be a Clippers fan

You are literally commenting on that exact discussion without even discussing it. I guess that makes you above it.

[Brazil]

I have never ever used the +/- stat when ting on Parker. I don't know where you got that from. I don't like it as sometimes it's influenced by who certain players are playing with. Parker's plus minus are usually pretty good because he gets carried by the starters. For instance he can be 3-8 shooting with 1 assists and be a +28. That wasn't the case last night though. He was -10 on 4-11 shooting with 1 assist. In other words he sucked, bad.

of course you did it... too lazy to find out but you spend your time launching "truth bomb" when one of your krew advance +/- to on Parker's good raw stat but you didn't give me some "truth bomb" (you really hurt my feelings sometimes) when pointing out when speaking about Kawhi stat line

[dabom]

I wonder if this will make a cover?

[SASdynasty!]

I have never ever used the +/- stat when ting on Parker. I don't know where you got that from. I don't like it as sometimes it's influenced by who certain players are playing with. Parker's plus minus are usually pretty good because he gets carried by the starters. For instance he can be 3-8 shooting with 1 assists and be a +28. That wasn't the case last night though. He was -10 on 4-11 shooting with 1 assist. In other words he sucked, bad.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!

[jag]

You realize a French poster started this thread to basically imply Kawhi deserves more criticism for Game 1, right?

If that's what you took from OP...then okay.

For the rest this site is nowadays polluted by personnal agendas and krew... nobody is capable anymore to have a fair statement or discussion about anything

[RD2191]

of course you did it... too lazy to find out but you spend your time launching "truth bomb" when one of your krew advance +/- to on Parker's good raw stat but you didn't give me some "truth bomb" (you really hurt my feelings sometimes) when pointing out when speaking about Kawhi stat line

truth bombs are truth bombs. I have never personally used it though. As I said I don't care for it much. I have almost always gone with "raw stats". Parkers have been all season.

[Mikeanaro]

I wonder if this will make a cover?

Why his ass is bigger than the photoshopped covers?

[Robz4000]

11 pages in 2 hours.

Brazil

Came here to post this but I was beaten to it...

[Brazil]

You realize a French poster started this thread to basically imply Kawhi deserves more criticism for Game 1, right?

primary idea is to highlight your double standard and yes there is no obvious reasons other than agendas to get 0 criticism for kawhi's game 1 when dude is clearly a top 10 player of the league and had a bad game