Reply With Quote
How would one know? That's my question.
So why does Coach Pop, who has more data than you (he's got more than a January article) and who is compe ive and wants to win and is recognized as the best coach in the game and one of the greatest all time, why oh why does he play Parker over Mills and COJO? Could you explain that? And when you're done, I'd love to hear your theories on who shot Kennedy and if a man really did walk on the moon.
How would one know? That's my question.
Thats debatable and thats what we are discussing here yet some of Parkerīs defenders dont have any stat or something to give, they said a 2 months article is old and the dude who wrote it is ugly but they didnt show their faces.
Because Parker is a , tbh. And Pop has benched him plenty before. Just because he's a great coach doesn't mean he doesn't make mistakes. He's the bed plenty of times. The media is just too chicken to call him on it.
So you don't know if Parker is playing any better since the article was written.
OK.
We aren't making the claim, cd98 is and he has yet to post any stats that show Parker is playing better.
Be specific.
Link?Be specific.
OK, so none of you know if he has played better since the article was written.
I'm fine with that.
Someone post stats saying otherwise. O right. There aren't any.
Not the one saying that he is. OK
Post some stats saying otherwise got. Do your homework.
Someone post stats saying otherwise. O right. There aren't any.
Nope, he is declining so I say he is not playing better, have you seen any moment where Parker recovers his speed? he always was the weakest Big 3 player and lucky to play with prime Duncan and prime Manu, Speedy Claxton was 3 millions years ago, but there was a Patty Mills last season during the Playoffs.
His court impact is most times negative even when scoring 25 points, dribble dribble etc.
No, I havent seen anything good since February to say heīs a better player, just the opposite.
I made no claims either way.
I just pointed out that neither you nor anyone know if he has played better or worse or the same since the article was written.
I'm fine with that.
What is your proof of this?
Do you have the stats like the statistician has presented?
Your not saying anything then.
Okay, so you're saying his play has stayed the same? Okay, that means he is playing like .
I said plenty.Your not saying anything then.
No, I explicitly said you don't know if he is playing the same.
The two wins thst Spurs had against over Clippers this year Parker averaged over 20 points and 10 assists. The one loss h had scored less then 10 points and 5 assists. I'd say based on those stats it's quite evident that Parker contribution to th team is important in beating LAC.
I think that's the correct conclusion.
No, you said you don't know if he's playing better or worse. if that's the case then he's playing the same which means he is playing like .
Do you have stats like the person in the article to back up your claim?I think that's the correct conclusion.
How about you, rob?
Did you see him in game 1 2015 playoffs first round last night? Not some ing regular season game. It's quite evident from last night more Enrique is a quick series for the clippers.
No, that isn't the case at all.
Read slower and with less rage.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
