One could say the same of your position if one wanted to sound like a , I guess.
And are you also claiming US families didn't negotiate because of US laws?
One could say the same of your position if one wanted to sound like a , I guess.
A government standing on principle to forgo the chance to save the lives of its own citizens is a dereliction of duty, period.
a govt being shaken down for $100Ms by terrorists is a sucker, encouraging never-ending hostage-taking.
Doesn't help that Imperial Corporatist -Measuring War-is-Our-Business-Plan USA is the biggest war monger, country-breaker on the planet. That could cause some pushback in the form of hostage taking.
It's tough situation.
I hear there are about 30 American hostages being held around the world now.
A chance to save some citizens while increasing the risk of danger to more citizens
The government isn't paying ransoms.
Do you read anything but your own RSS feed?
have you GFY today? I answering to "A government standing on principle to forgo the chance to save the lives of its own citizens is a dereliction of duty, period.", NOT to the new USA hostage policy.
How much is a family member's life worth to you?
So you're not talking about any actual US policy and just ranting about nothing.
OK.
a lot. if my own family were involved, i'd have a more emotional response to it. that's not the duty of the government.
So you'd be fine if you were forbidden to do anything to save the life of your family member because of a government policy?
there are a lot of things i wouldn't be fine with. if my family were falsely imprisoned and ordered to 30 years of hard labor in north korea, i'd be upset that the US isn't doing anything to help that situation either.
it's not the duty of the government to pander to the emotions of individuals. sometimes difficult decisions need to be made for the general welfare
So you'd be fine if you were forbidden to do anything to save the life of your family member because of a government policy?
i answered that question already
Is it the duty of the government to lawfully preclude an individual from negotiating the release of another citizen?
No, you didn't.
So you'd be fine if you were forbidden to do anything to save the life of your family member because of a government policy?
i've answered the question already. feel free to go back through my responses, and read them carefully.
No, you didn't.
So you'd be fine if you were forbidden to do anything to save the life of your family member because of a government policy?
paging chump
Appreciate the artice. Still doesn't look like it is anywhere close to the 0% you claimed.
I said close to zero.
I'll wait for you to produce deaths of hostages from said countries now.
I can't find it. Was it a yes or no?
My answer is no.
St Ronnie paid ransom money for hostages
Forgetting Reagan’s Worst Scandal
https://consortiumnews.com/2015/06/2...worst-scandal/
Useful Idiot St Ronnie and his accomplices, another really nasty bunch of assholes
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)