Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 101 to 124 of 124
  1. #101
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    You might want to take a look at the hostages from countries that allow such negotiations.

    I'm sure you haven't
    And are you also claiming US families didn't negotiate because of US laws?

  2. #102
    Believe. admiralsnackbar's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    4,010
    are you being purposely obtuse?
    One could say the same of your position if one wanted to sound like a , I guess.

  3. #103
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,927
    A government standing on principle to forgo the chance to save the lives of its own citizens is a dereliction of duty, period.

  4. #104
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    A government standing on principle to forgo the chance to save the lives of its own citizens is a dereliction of duty, period.
    a govt being shaken down for $100Ms by terrorists is a sucker, encouraging never-ending hostage-taking.

    Doesn't help that Imperial Corporatist -Measuring War-is-Our-Business-Plan USA is the biggest war monger, country-breaker on the planet. That could cause some pushback in the form of hostage taking.

    It's tough situation.

    I hear there are about 30 American hostages being held around the world now.

  5. #105
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    A government standing on principle to forgo the chance to save the lives of its own citizens is a dereliction of duty, period.
    A chance to save some citizens while increasing the risk of danger to more citizens

  6. #106
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    a govt being shaken down for $100Ms by terrorists is a sucker, encouraging never-ending hostage-taking.
    The government isn't paying ransoms.

    Do you read anything but your own RSS feed?

  7. #107
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    The government isn't paying ransoms.

    Do you read anything but your own RSS feed?
    have you GFY today? I answering to "A government standing on principle to forgo the chance to save the lives of its own citizens is a dereliction of duty, period.", NOT to the new USA hostage policy.

  8. #108
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    A chance to save some citizens while increasing the risk of danger to more citizens
    How much is a family member's life worth to you?

  9. #109
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    have you GFY today? I answering to "A government standing on principle to forgo the chance to save the lives of its own citizens is a dereliction of duty, period.", NOT to the new USA hostage policy.
    So you're not talking about any actual US policy and just ranting about nothing.

    OK.

  10. #110
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    How much is a family member's life worth to you?
    a lot. if my own family were involved, i'd have a more emotional response to it. that's not the duty of the government.

  11. #111
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    a lot. if my own family were involved, i'd have a more emotional response to it. that's not the duty of the government.
    So you'd be fine if you were forbidden to do anything to save the life of your family member because of a government policy?

  12. #112
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    So you'd be fine if you were forbidden to do anything to save the life of your family member because of a government policy?
    there are a lot of things i wouldn't be fine with. if my family were falsely imprisoned and ordered to 30 years of hard labor in north korea, i'd be upset that the US isn't doing anything to help that situation either.

    it's not the duty of the government to pander to the emotions of individuals. sometimes difficult decisions need to be made for the general welfare

  13. #113
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    there are a lot of things i wouldn't be fine with. if my family were falsely imprisoned and ordered to 30 years of hard labor in north korea, i'd be upset that the US isn't doing anything to help that situation either.

    it's not the duty of the government to pander to the emotions of individuals. sometimes difficult decisions need to be made for the general welfare
    So you'd be fine if you were forbidden to do anything to save the life of your family member because of a government policy?

  14. #114
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    So you'd be fine if you were forbidden to do anything to save the life of your family member because of a government policy?
    i answered that question already

  15. #115
    Veteran Th'Pusher's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    6,130
    a lot. if my own family were involved, i'd have a more emotional response to it. that's not the duty of the government.
    Is it the duty of the government to lawfully preclude an individual from negotiating the release of another citizen?

  16. #116
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    i answered that question already
    No, you didn't.

    So you'd be fine if you were forbidden to do anything to save the life of your family member because of a government policy?

  17. #117
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    No, you didn't.

    So you'd be fine if you were forbidden to do anything to save the life of your family member because of a government policy?
    i've answered the question already. feel free to go back through my responses, and read them carefully.

  18. #118
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    i've answered the question already. feel free to go back through my responses, and read them carefully.
    No, you didn't.

    So you'd be fine if you were forbidden to do anything to save the life of your family member because of a government policy?

  19. #119
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    It appears you have. I would be interested in seeing successful hostage ransoms paid to those held hostage by Middle Easterners.
    paging chump

  20. #120
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    No money reportedly changed hands in the recent cases that made headlines. The governments of the U.S. and the U.K. say they refuse to pay ransom for their citizens, but other governments, private companies and individuals have turned over millions to terrorist organizations like al Qaeda and ISIS, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.

    Security officials told ABC News that prior to the execution of journalist James Foley, several other European hostages had been released by ISIS – but only after the terror group received a reported $2 million to $3 million for each. According to public remarks by U.S. Treasury officials, at least $165 million in ransom has been funneled to terrorist organizations since 2008.
    http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/fullpa...eedom-25114240

  21. #121
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    Appreciate the artice. Still doesn't look like it is anywhere close to the 0% you claimed.

  22. #122
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    Appreciate the artice. Still doesn't look like it is anywhere close to the 0% you claimed.
    I said close to zero.

    I'll wait for you to produce deaths of hostages from said countries now.

  23. #123
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,642
    i've answered the question already. feel free to go back through my responses, and read them carefully.
    I can't find it. Was it a yes or no?

    My answer is no.

  24. #124
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    St Ronnie paid ransom money for hostages

    Forgetting Reagan’s Worst Scandal

    https://consortiumnews.com/2015/06/2...worst-scandal/

    Useful Idiot St Ronnie and his accomplices, another really nasty bunch of assholes



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •