Spurs: Danny Green as viewed from posters upstairs....

[hater]

the best 3 and D player in the league still undervalued by Spurs fans tbh

fat Spurs fans that think the SG position needs to be a creator or efficient scorer.

The only good thing if Green leaves is watching these same dumbasses cry while our backcourt filled by Enrique and some other scrub get torched continuously while Leonard carries all the defensive load.

Because he's underrated. Because the media wants to believe he's a product of the System, which is a mythical concept they've made up in their heads to explain the Spurs' sustained success (because it can't be that the Spurs just have really good players). Teams are using analytics nowadays, and they can see that Green is elite on both sides of the ball. That's why the media believes teams are willing to open their checkbooks for him. People who run teams for a living KNOW Green's in the top quarter of starting two-guards. And they contract they propose he'll get will be a bargain.

We're in a world where Monta Ellis will get $13-15 Million a year, and he's not a good of a player as Danny is.

If the Spurs lose Green they lose the matchup advantage with Golden State.

Green was just as essential as Kawhi in the le run. Why do people go all out in discrediting players to fit their argument? You just sound like a bitter Danny Green hater right now.

Yes, he did. Paul had a tough time scoring whenever Green had to guard him. I'm not good at drawing up analytics (Chinook is much better), but I watched the game and Green gave Paul fits whenever he guarded him. Same with Ellis. Pop just ed around too much in the Clippers series with Green (it didn't help that Green's 3 point shot was costing his playing time).

Then how was he a different player? Because in college, he was pretty much the same player he is now, except his team's fans appreciated him. In the d-league, he did a lot more than he does now, including being a pretty consistent player above the rim.

Jodie Meeks got 3yr/19 mil tbh. Green will get at least 11-12mil per year this summer.

I can't say I'm a fan at all of giving up Green to land Aldridge,

[spurraider21]

they're right you know

[ElNono]

can OP explain the joke, tbh?

[Robz4000]

They're all truth bombs tbh. Whats your point?

[baseline bum]

can OP explain the joke, tbh?

Op thinks a Porker + Gary Neal backcourt is a le contender.

[hater]

Would like inputs from peeps other than spur fan tbh. This posted here. Nobody said they were off. But some are funny

Thanks for contributing thou

[Chinook]

Hater strikes me as a guy who'd TP his own house by mistake. Dunno what made me think of that.

[baseline bum]

Would like inputs from peeps other than spur fan tbh. This posted here. Nobody said they were off. But some are funny

Thanks for contributing thou

I like the part where you want to use the league minimum to sign the team's starting two guard in a swing dominated league.

[hater]

Op thinks a Porker + Gary Neal backcourt is a le contender.

Says the guy that would not give up Green for Lamarcus

[timtonymanu]

Just look at how OP views JR Smith upstairs and that tells you all.

[hater]

Green riders rolling deep

[Thread]

He's got some cold blood running thru, no doubt about that, but, set him elsewhere, anywhere and he shrinks. He has to know this deep in his soul and must decide whether a few more $'s is worth it.

[benefactor]

[hater]

He's got some cold blood running thru, no doubt about that, but, set him elsewhere, anywhere and he shrinks. He has to know this deep in his soul and must decide whether a few more $'s is worth it.

Thanks for sharing

[Chinook]

Green riders rolling deep

Army of one right now. Gotta get palangi and LongtimeSpursFan in here to back you up.

[baseline bum]

Says the guy that would not give up Green for Lamarcus

I wouldn't blow the team up for Aldridge in Duncan's last two years. You would start Gary Neal next to Tony Parker and have the Spurs give up 110 a game.

[hater]

I wouldn't blow the team up for Aldridge in Duncan's last two years. You would start Gary Neal next to Tony Parker and have the Spurs give up 110 a game.

so losing Green = blow up the team?

(does not compute)

[baseline bum]

so losing Green = blow up the team?

(does not compute)

Yes, they'd have to move Green and Splitter and then renounce Joseph, Baynes, and Belinelli. You would start Gary Neal and Tony Parker and have no bench.

[Sean Cagney]

I wouldn't blow the team up for Aldridge in Duncan's last two years. You would start Gary Neal next to Tony Parker and have the Spurs give up 110 a game.

OH GOD please don't mention Neal again, remember back a few weeks ago someone actually wanted him back and argued with me about it trying to tell me he is not as bad on D as Belli is (When he is every bit as bad on D, infact horrible).

[hater]

Yes, they'd have to move Green and Splitter and then renounce Joseph, Baynes, and Belinelli. You would start Gary Neal and Tony Parker and have no bench.

I can't say I'm a fan at all of giving up Green to land Aldridge,

moving goal posts. ok. then

[Thread]

I can't say I'm a fan at all of giving up Green to land Aldridge,

Absolutely. That would be cutting off your nose to spite your face.

[LongtimeSpursFan]

I'd take a frontocurt of Duncan, Aldridge and Kawhi. Probably best frontocurt in nba. With Parker and a solid SG like Marco and we have a unit where the 1-4 can shoot, dribble, pass etc.
Dont get me wrong I'd like to keep Green but the economics may just not work out.

[baseline bum]

I can't say I'm a fan at all of giving up Green to land Aldridge,

moving goal posts. ok. then

You're the got who couldn't even answer a simple question about guard options.

[ElNono]

this thread

[baseline bum]

I'd take a frontocurt of Duncan, Aldridge and Kawhi. Probably best frontocurt in nba. With Parker and a solid SG like Marco and we have a unit where the 1-4 can shoot, dribble, pass etc.
Dont get me wrong I'd like to keep Green but the economics may just not work out.

The economics wouldn't work out for Belinelli to be here either without a sign and trade.