Reply With Quote
No one is obsessed with your spam posting style. You are just easily predictable and just like I called it you instantly deflected from the Democrat at issue.
So he's your whether or not he does something wrong? That's pretty re ed tbh.
No one is obsessed with your spam posting style. You are just easily predictable and just like I called it you instantly deflected from the Democrat at issue.
Sanders/Warren would be much better than Obama."But, but, Bernie will throw all the banksters in jail for realsies! You'll all see!"
I made a personal contribution of $500 to Martin O'Malley's campaign, so I really don't see how I'm a rightwingnut.
This is a situation of obvious, blatant corruption, which should piss you off regardless of whether or not the guy has a "D" or "R" next to his name.
I had the pleasure of meeting Mr. Holder in DC during my fraternity's centennial conference. He hung out with my chapter after our meetings and was very chill. He also wrote a check to one of our social service initiatives.
Sanders was too chicken to even glance at the Fed. Warren is a faux-Cherokee nutjob. Neither one of them know anything about economics, they just say a bunch of pla udes like "rich people are bad!" and "you deserve free !" and get raucous applause for it from the left.
You are shining example of what is wrong with our country. The most corrupt attorney general of our time is your because he hung out with you, gave you daps, and is chill. Please withhold from voting next election.
But they're crazy nutbag socialists.
Damn, I posted too late. Clippers_deux on cue.
Didn't Sanders work with Ron Paul on trying to get the fed audited? Honest question as I can remember.
Ron tried, but Bernie sabotaged the bill in the end:
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/96...-fed-amendment
Well that's disappointing tbh. Still though, the amended bill Sanders pushed would have done more than any of the other candidates from either party have pushed.
People in this country latch onto substance-less bull like, "He's a cool dude who hung out with my frat!" rather than worry about a politicians actual record and policy.
"I like him because he cares as much about the Kardashians as I do!"
I'm sorry u feel that way
And I'm sorry you are they way.
You're not intelligent enough to be smug no offense. I'm not surprised that you think this way, most blacks do think this tribally I'm just saying.
so You People really think McLiar's or Bishop Gecko's DoJ would have jailed any banksters?
No, what does that have to do with Obama being a well trained monkey?
LOL at the idea of them ever raising the billion dollars in bribes one needs to get elected president though.
you honestly think Elizabeth Warren knows nothing about economics and gets by on pla udes? She was a Harvard Law School Economics Professor. She devoted her life to economics, is one of the most well-respected and prominent economic minds. She was a Republican up until 1995 when that party completely lost their and became a bunch of economic suicidal nutjobs that ended up completely destroying the economy. She wasn't even a politician until 3 years ago. She knows more about economics than the entire Republican party + Reason magazine combined.
You're a ing moron.
Definitely not Romney, but there's a slim chance McCain would have. He's a crazy, neoconservative old man, but he's been pretty vocal about how horribly we handled the financial crisis.
You can ignore it all you want but in 2008 it was the Democrats pushing a bailout and ALL the Wall Street campaign money was flowing in Obama's direction.
Last edited by Will Hunting; 08-02-2015 at 09:35 PM.
No offense taken
To the OP, Holder's tenure at DoJ was probably the most disgraceful part of the Obama presidency. As mentioned, not a single Wall St. crook in jail or even prosecuted, but even worse the non-prosecution or investigation of the Bush torture regime. The Geneva Conventions are clear. If you don't investigate allegations of torture, you are guilty of conspiracy. And considering "we tortured some folks" and did not investigate or hold those who tortured accountable, Holder is criminally responsible.
First of all, she was a bankruptcy law professor, you ing imbecile, not an economics professor. Secondly, she lied her way to the top of academia by pretending to be Native American. Thirdly, she's so re ed that she thinks raising the minimum wage to $25/hour immediately would have zero negative effects on the economy, she has no idea where productivity gains come from or where profits go to, and she honestly believes that banks would be willing to give out student loans at a rate that's below the rate of inflation (essentially volunteering to lose money). Of course that's to be expected from someone who's never spent a day of her life doing real work and has lied her way through life to separate people from their money.
You're a ing moron.
http://www.realclearmarkets.com/arti...ty_100222.html
http://rare.us/story/elizabeth-warre...economy-works/
McLiar didn't "handle" , so he's in a great position to throw at those who did.
TARP was a Repug program, from Repug Treasury Paulson and approved by the WH.
Do you really think if the Repugs were in the WH and controlled Congress in 08/09 that they would have let the financial sector collapse, all TBTF go bankrupt?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
