LOL. This shtick seems vaguely familiar....
When you say "everything else" what exactly are you referring to? You obviously have some specific incident(s) in mind
LOL. This shtick seems vaguely familiar....
I'm not doing a shtick, cantthinkofanything
Oh my bad. I didn't know that people could see the same exact plays all around the world at the same time back then. I thought it would take years to travel from one place to another and then it would change as it went. Weird, what do I know?
http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/u...om-gay-bullies
http://shoebat.com/2015/09/10/ se...ng-to-america/
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015... -decision/
That kind of everything else. It's ridiculous and makes both sides look like morons.
Oh you don't agree with me?! Well you are a narrow minded (insert liberal, bible thumper, sinner, bigot, etc.)!
It's the same stupid argument for both sides. Why not just let people be who they want to be? That goes for both groups.
k, that still doesn't explain the importance of seeing the movie before writing new books. Do you really think the authors of the later books of the Bible had no idea of previous books/stories?
"Why not just let people be who they want to be?"
Christian Taliban are forcing non-Christians to submit to their religious bullsht, iow, NOT letting people be who they want to be.
Follow along home boy. I am against that as well.
Plus, I don't see a lot of people submitting to anything. Religious or not.
Can't the same be said for all the "if you don't love two men in love then you must be a hateful bigot!" I see just as much propaganda for both sides and I don't see anyone saying "You know what? Those guys are right. Let me submit to their ideas"
Not agreeing with someone's beliefs is not the same as slandering, mocking and being a condescending a hole. You can disagree with someone without being a d bag. Again, that goes for both sides.
tips fedora
nah, brah i have to agree with you here.
The "gay side" isn't condoning illegal death threats. If some idiots are caught saying they'll rape and kill her, they should be charged.
And saying the "argument is the same for both sides" is stupidly false. Gays have a legal right to get married. If she is denying them that right, then she's breaking the law. It's not even an argument. That's why she went to jail.
It wasn't as easy to come by. I'm not saying that they couldn't have known some of the stories but books then weren't like books now. That's just fact. It's not like they could have gone to Ye Olde Barnes & Noble and picked up a copy of Matthew.
So it's ok to lump all religious people together but not all gay people? You do know that they aren't exlusive right? There are plenty of religious gay people as well.
I'm all for throwing that crazy in jail. Never said I was against it. I never once said she should not have gone to jail. I actually think I said the opposite along with impeachment.
Nice strawman you built there, homey
Who's lumping all religious people together here? it's not even about lumping gays together. It's about the law.
You're all over the place. I don't even know what argument you're trying to make
Then you're ing re ed.
Yet, you cuck for Islam.
Neh, you're just upset because I called you out and you couldn't back it up
Neh, but I'm sure someone here will believe you
Your wife backs it up into Jamaal err day
You never called me out. Repeating an argument is not winning one.
Right i never called you out
Notice how all this Blake does is go around bugging everyone, what a worthless slab of this prick is.
As far as Jesus goes, I doubt it was like that. We are seeing the origins of the fantasy novels there. Just stories written by numerous authors, the why is the mystery.
But, there is little doubt "something" is responsible for all this that we can't explain.
When did you ever call me out?
Hey b2b, how did your business work out?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)