If I were chasing $$$$$$ I'd pass, but being up $$$$$$, yep, just caled it in at Atl - 3.5. Playing 110-win 100.
This just seems too easy, not a fan of this "spot", this is more a .. it!
If I were chasing $$$$$$ I'd pass, but being up $$$$$$, yep, just caled it in at Atl - 3.5. Playing 110-win 100.
This just seems too easy, not a fan of this "spot", this is more a .. it!
I don't advocate gambling, but the Saints are going to get destroyed.![]()
Way to go old timer. I think we'll win some $ tonight.
Just doubled Atlanta too.
Wtf I just checked the score. He's having his playoff meltdown early it seems...
Anti Avante betting system going to work
$
As this freak totally ignores plus $1060 this season and plus $2100 in 2014, and me talking about this being a ????? play.
Notice this re totally ignores all those winners?
Last edited by Avante; 10-16-2015 at 03:14 AM.
I knew better but have no doubts I'll get the $$$$$ back Sunday. I think I'll stick to the fundamentals from now on, that being...
.....a small home dog in a division game where a loss ends their season.
It is funny, I win....crickets. I wn.....crickets. I win....crickets. I lose.....and here they come, hahahahaha!!!!!!!!! Totally ignoring the fact I just went 3-1.
Let's look at where I went wrong, what did we learn?
I had no intentions of playing this game as I mentioned above, there was something wrong with Atlanta - 3.5. It didn't feel right.
What was wrong was the fact Atlanta had barely been wiinning their games, now on the road in a short week vs a team in desperation mode. A must win situation for NO, a 5-1 record no big deal for the Falcons. I knew all this, that's why I was going to pass. Then I read.,...Marcus Colston inactive. As we know he is Brees go to guy, that changed my mind. Yep, I had too much info, I ignored the fundamentals, yep....STOO-PEED!
Won't happen again.
Marcus Colston playing or not was completely irrelevant and shouldn't have had any bearing on any decision to bet this game or not. Falcons should have been up at halftime. At least give them a chance to cover by the end of the game. But you have to give credit to New Orleans for the halftime adjustments that seemed to keep the Atlanta offense in check until garbage time.
Atlanta's pass defense is trash though. Couldn't really get much pressure on Brees and ended up with receivers (mainly that TE) wide open.
You're absolutely right, Thursday night games are crap shoots. The one time I do pick up the action, I lose![]()
I know I'm always going to win 3-5, but that Saints game hurts. Talk about being a ing rookie, sheesh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ATS wagering 101
A small home dog coming off a humiliating loss now at home vs a division opponet with a lead on them. Take the points.
I went against basic fundamentals. ing idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!
I need something I can grin about.
Last edited by Avante; 10-17-2015 at 06:21 AM.
Someone need to alert the local schools.
Be on the lookout for a creeper in a pedo van.
Stranger Danger
Dookie Ranger
Stranger Danger
You're the ing dummy who got me thinking bout that game, ya dumb . You owe me 110 bucks slick.
Let me ask ya a question half pint.
If you'd been in the navy in 1970, would you have...."oh no no no my dear. not me"....well? You do know you act totally re ed over this, right?
There was a Navy in 1970? Idk...
And sorry about influencing your betting old timer. If you're making monetary decisions based on what I say...maybe you should rethink this sports wagering thing. Don't ya think. Sheesh.
Ok....
plus $1060
Week 6
NYJ - 6
Den - 4
Vikes - 3
GB - 9.5
NE - 7
110 to win 100
Idk where you get Pats-7.
I have
Pats -10
Cinci -3.5
Jets -6.5
Seahawks -7
http://linemakers.sportingnews.com/a...-giants-eagles
I called this one in the minute the line came out. I knew it would be bet up.
But, ya do know I'm not at all interested in your picks, right?
Not good picks and I'm not speaking particularly on the Seattle line
Those lines were from early las week. Is that when you put your bet in on NE?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)