Forget about being the best coach in the league by a mile..
is he actually the only good coach in the NFL, now that based Jim Harbaugh is gone, tbh fams? McCarthy- horrible, Payton- washed up, Carroll- lol
I like the way Rivera has progressed as a coach. We need a new OC, but considering how terrible Rivera was when we first got him, it's really a treat to see him turn into an above-average coach.
I think a lot of teams should just stick with a coach. Time gives experience which gives wisdom.
I can see it now...
Wife...you horny?
You...ya know the Panthers are undefeated?
Boss...you're late.
You...Cam Newton is da man!
Cop...you know how fast you were going?
you...Ted Ginn ran a 4.3.
How in the does Ron Rivera (who ain't won ) belong in a thread about the great Bill Belichick?
Bill Walsh, Chuck Noll, Vince Lombardi, Don Shula, ok, but Ron Rivera,ha~~~~~~~~~~
I'm interested to see what Quinn does in Atlanta.
He's definitely mastered the art of cheating. He will always be remembered for that, and for being a fake tough guy with the press. Truth is Bill is a coward, and an asshole.
Chargers just need to promote pagano
tbh You think Bill will stick around for the fallout after Brady retires ?
Avante: hey girl what's up? How old are you?
girl: 14
Avante: 21, okay!!! Do you watch football?
girl: no I'm from Viet..
Avante: there are 30 players in NFL history who have dated girls in their teens. Lawrence Taylor, Big Ben..
girl: Uh, oka...
Avante: don't get me started on long Wilson!!
BTW got Rivera has a COTY trophy
Tough to rank NFL coaches, considering all their coordinators, tbh..
Carroll is still a really good coach IMO, Wilson probably becomes like Kapernick if he leaves..
Belichick's best attribute is that he doesn't keep players for too long..it's tough being a long-tenured NFL coach, players are going to eventually tune you out, this isn't other sports, NFL players literally negatively alter their lives every time they step on the field, you can only tolerate a coach for so long..
Meh... Wilson has always been accurate and efficient.
Avante won that slap fight.
Good question, he might purely for ego purposes to show he can win with a new QB.
In what should have been an f up for the ages, that being failure to call timeout as Seahawk was about to score the go ahead.....oh nevermind Pete Carol to the rescue.
That altered media for the next 20 years.
So in answer to the question, yes he is an above ave coach in a league with virtually no good HCs. Some, and while i do not agree but i do not invalidate their take, think Vegas runs 90% of the show in the NFL.
You of all people should not be implying that others are obsessive. How many threads have you derailed over the past few years with your useless track-and-field spam? I've lost count.
What isn't useless to you guy? How many times have you been wrong or said something stupid or called somebody a got, well?
you punk, ok?
That was stupid half pint.
And......
Dude, there was a war going on in Viet Nam, ok? The Navy went other places for R&R ok stupid? Hong Kong, Japan, Thailand, alright? The Phillipines was for refueling, ok? There is a huge navy base at Subic Bay, alright?
Rookies, sheesh~~~~~~~~~~~
Little people are you telling me if you'd been in my position you wouldn't have hit the bars looking for pussy? I say....BULL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Getting back on topic....
Belichick has been lucky to have Tom Brady as his QB, justlike Walsh had Montana, Lombardi had Starr, Shula had Griese. We don't see many great NFL coachs who didn't have a great QB.
Belichick does a have an uncanny ability to bring in players that fit what he needs, he's the best at that. With the exception of Randy Moss.Curtis Martin, the Pats don't have "great" receivers or backs, yet it doesn't matter.
dont forget about how Manning had Stabler
Come on little man, I'm that guy who can talk the first game the Raiders ever played, and you know that, talk about Raiders you've never heard of. You really this tiny?
OP hasn't returned to the MLB forum since his awful ALCS prediction
Jays were favored at a 58% clip for the first 5 games. Royals have played them well thoughOP hasn't returned to the MLB forum since his awful ALCS prediction
Last edited by AlexJones; 10-21-2015 at 02:48 PM.
So it's not a bad prediction, but a "bad" result? The Jays are the better statistical team, but they can definitely lose 4 games before the Royals do, albeit not as likely as the Royals losing 4 games. Baseball is a lot closer to hockey than it is to basketball.
The Jays had a <20% probability of being down 3-1 after 4 games. But it happens. A bad prediction would be "KC sweeps", but it could have happened and it'd still be a bad prediction regardless of result because the data doesn't support that at all.
Last edited by AlexJones; 10-21-2015 at 04:43 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
