Reply With Quote
Yes, Asians certainly understand the protocol of a voting system.Oh STFU already. It's like LeHype and Jim having more MVPs than Kobe. The white media don't get ASG votes my Asian sn. Neal with it.
Basically a retirement watch. You can tell Bean is on his way out. When was the last time dude smile in a 30 point blowout before this season?? Can't say well deserved because of the season. Nonetheless, good to see him go out smiling.
Yes, Asians certainly understand the protocol of a voting system.Oh STFU already. It's like LeHype and Jim having more MVPs than Kobe. The white media don't get ASG votes my Asian s
Not a lot of fans hate him compared to those who vote for him. You are talking about casual fans who know nothing better than news highlights. You have to understand the game to see how much a cancer he is to dislike him.
Besides, I just remembered people can vote multiple times so those who are fanatics (kobes tans) can just vote everyday to jack up the numbers)
Last edited by ambchang; 12-26-2015 at 09:51 AM.
Wouldn't be surprised Santa raped a couple of times. Spend all year isolated from the opposite sex with reindeers and elves, has the ability of breaking into houses, spies on people all year (voyeriusm). Could be fat white version of Kobe.
You got nary room. Your Neal raped as well. Then you hired him.
I hope they build a stage for Kobe like they did for Mike and they have Kobe passing the torch (1st pass in NBA history for him) to some younger player. I hope they cheese it up so bad that they'll be cleaning the vomit and semen from the arena for months.
I hope Duncan loses his 1st 5th, $25 million, his wife & children.
tee, hee.
Thrashed by Uncle Tom Rivers at home on Christmas ing Day.
Tom showing you mercy for most of the game and you still couldn't play NBA level basketball
Kobe's 3pt shot treated like a Superbowl winning touchdown.
Bail Robinson, absent again with lame excuse.
DMC in the pool of 29 with Bail.
ha, ha.
Neal raped & you know it.
All I know is that he was acquitted. I wouldn't have known one way or the other if it wasn't for the court of law and I am not sure how you can be so convinced one way or another. Were you there? Do you know more than the entire court of law?
It's either two rapists or none, Chang
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Winship
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffin_v._United_States
Innocent until proven guilty, no guilt was proven.
One is proven to be innocent by the court of law.It's either two rapists or none, Chang
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Winship
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffin_v._United_States
Innocent until proven guilty, no guilt was proven.
The other is assumed innocent due to payoff.
Faber ain't working in a hotel no more.
In one case the prosecution could not convict.
In the other case the prosecution could not convict.
That is all. If you are going to go by accusations alone then both parties are equally rapists.
Both parties are rapists.
In one case the accused was acquitted.
In the other the accused could not be prosecuted because he paid the victim off.
It's like saying consesual and rape is the same.
In both cases two people had sex.
True. Kobe raped sexually.
Faber raped financially.
Innocence is assumed and neither parties had their innocence compromised. Saying anything else is simply assumption by your part unless you were Faber or Bryant's lawyer.
In both cases they are innocent in the eyes of objectivity. If you want to be fair, both are rapists.
Sexual intercourse is known and neither parties had their sexual activities compromised. Saying anything else is simply assumption by your part unless you were Rapist or the victim.
In both cases they had sex in eyes of objectivity. If you want to be fair, both had sex.
Fairness is calling both a rapist if you wish to call one that.
So...
Kobe & Neal raped
or...
Neither
Nope. I already explained the difference but you continue to force your definition on me.
I have been fair, I draw the line at acquittal vs refusal to testify due to death threats.
It's not my definition, it's objectively how the law works.
Both are innocent for the same reason: Prosecution could not secure a guilty verdict. Supreme court has made it clear that until guilt is proven, the defendant is innocent.
You're simply trying to cut it down to different shades of innocence, but that's subjectivity. You were not Bryant's lawyer so you only assume the details of their civil dispute.
So if you ever accept Bryant is a rapist, it only follows logic to assume Neal is one as well because you are basing it on accusation alone.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
