,,,and if he does repeat, there is no more argument who is the best QB of all time,,,,
...they should be humiliated and ashamed. It's just them and three fraud teams who they should easily beat.
,,,and if he does repeat, there is no more argument who is the best QB of all time,,,,
Funny that a fan of a loser has a say on the topic
At Denver they're a 58-42 favorite
Vs Carolina they're very slight underdogs
Vs Arizona they're a toss up/slight favorites
The public will be all over the Patriots from now on to the super bowl, so naturally I'll fade them and end up losing
Last edited by AlexJones; 01-17-2016 at 08:29 PM.
Already did that last year IMO.
If Brady loses TWO consecutive postseason games to washed up Pey after losing two SBs to Eli he can't EVER call himself the GOAT.![]()
And if he gets one for the thumb,,,its game.set.match,,,
technically, the four best teams advanced, so...
Neither one of these Panther/Cards teams know what a Supebowl is like. While these Pats do, this is a biggie. And ya give Belichick two weeks to prepare, he does, If all the stars are there for the Pats come SB time, they will win it.
If New England does repeat the NFL is fcked. They have absolutely no significant free agents and will still have $5 - $10 million in cap space to add pieces. Unless there are major injuries they won't have any real threats in the AFC outside of maybe Pittsburgh.
Ravens should be pretty tough next year too.
Every year since they won the SB the Ravens have been picked as a pre-season sleeper. I'm not buying it yet. I think Pittsburgh will kill them next year if they stay healthy.
Tom getting long in the tooth. one elite year left, then two years left as a game manager+![]()
Probably. He might have 2 more elite years left since he was a backup in college and sat his first year, thus he has less mileage.
Super Bowl experience is the most overrated intangible there is.
Patriots never would have beat the Rams
Giants never would have beat Patriots
Colts would have defeated the Saints
Steelers would have defeated the Packers
Broncos would have defeated Seahawks
, the Bills would be a dynasty.
It matters the way a coin flip to start the game matters.
Sadly, the Steelers are the Ravens and have been their for a while. Ravens have won like 8 of 11, 5 of 6 including that playoff win last season against Pittsburgh. They even swept the Steelers this year. That is one team that bothers the out of me. They know how to get to Big Ben, and Harbaugh is a great coach. Steelers have stopped owning the Ravens after the 2011 divisional round game.
i think brady retires if he wins tbh
I think I'll go with what these guys say about it, not that they are the only ones.
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-super-...owl-experience
Maybe Manning but no way Brady would. He's still playing too well and would want to go for a three-peat.
Lookit stick, Tommy O'Brady already said he wants to play till he's 45. I fahkin bet he could play until he's 50 fahkin years old, and still be the best fahkin QB in the league! It's wicked crazy to think he hangs em up after winning Ring #5 since he's basically fahkin guaranteed to win 3-4 fahkin more.
That's nice. Final results suggest it's about as relevant as which team receives the ball first.
Of the recent Super Bowls where one team had significantly more experience than its opponant, the experienced team is no more likely to win than the non-experienced.
I've cited six examples from last 15 years. And half the Super Bowls pitted equally experienced teams.
, of even the losing teams, almost all were within one score.
Fact is, since 2001, experience is a code word and little else. Even the mighty Patriots couldn't always make it work.
Patriots over Rams (didn't matter)
Buccaneers over Raiders (equally experienced)
Patriots over Panthers (maybe mattered, though last to have ball mattered more)
Patriots over Eagles (mattered because TO said McNabb was up chucking)
Steelers over Seahawks (equally experienced)
Colts over Bears (equally experienced)
Giants over Patriots (didn't matter)
Steelers over Cardinals (maybe mattered)
Saints over Colts (didn't matter)
Packers over Steelers (didn't matter)
Giants over Patriots (equally experienced since 2008)
Ravens over 49ers (equally experienced)
Seahawks over Broncos (didn't matter)
Patriots over Seahawks (equally experienced in recency)
That's like six seasons the zero experienced team beat the team with more or the QB with more, to only three seasons where most experienced won, and four where neither team truly held experience advantage.
Raw stats say you're full of .
Exactly OP is a head like Meek
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)